RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Bayesian Decision Analysis of the Exceedance Probability in the Application of Occupational Exposure Limits

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103639599

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Bayesian statistics holds promise for improved decision making with limited data. This approach will likely achieve wider acceptance in the environmental health and safety community if it is made available in easily accessible software. The objectives of this study were to explore the calculation parameters and to discuss the issues involved with Bayesian decision making of exceedance probability in the application of occupational exposure limits. Using an Excel spreadsheet developed by the author that can perform the Bayesian decision analysis, the sensitivity of the boundary conditions of the calculation domain were calculated and compared. In addition, the effects of uncertainty and number of data were investigated. The advantages and disadvantages of using a probability approach in occupational health are discussed. It was concluded that the choice of parameter space and choice of exposure matrix are important in Bayesian decision analysis in occupational health settings.
      번역하기

      Bayesian statistics holds promise for improved decision making with limited data. This approach will likely achieve wider acceptance in the environmental health and safety community if it is made available in easily accessible software. The objectives...

      Bayesian statistics holds promise for improved decision making with limited data. This approach will likely achieve wider acceptance in the environmental health and safety community if it is made available in easily accessible software. The objectives of this study were to explore the calculation parameters and to discuss the issues involved with Bayesian decision making of exceedance probability in the application of occupational exposure limits. Using an Excel spreadsheet developed by the author that can perform the Bayesian decision analysis, the sensitivity of the boundary conditions of the calculation domain were calculated and compared. In addition, the effects of uncertainty and number of data were investigated. The advantages and disadvantages of using a probability approach in occupational health are discussed. It was concluded that the choice of parameter space and choice of exposure matrix are important in Bayesian decision analysis in occupational health settings.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 피영규, "우리나라 석면함유제품 취급 사업장의 공기 중 석면 농도의 시간적 변화" 한국산업보건학회 26 (26): 454-465, 2016

      2 Ramachandran G, "Toward better exposure assessment strategies - the new NIOSH initiative" 52 : 297-301, 2008

      3 Schinkel J, "The Advanced REACH Tool (ART): incorporation of an exposure measurement database" 2013

      4 Tielemans E, "Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm" 52 : 443-454, 2008

      5 van de Ven P, "Stoffenmanager exposure model: company-specific exposure assessments using a Bayesian methodology" 7 : 216-223, 2010

      6 Ramachandran G, "Retrospective exposure assessment using Bayesian methods" 45 : 651-667, 2001

      7 Chen YC, "Retrospective exposure assessment in a chemical research and development facility" 39 : 111-121, 2012

      8 Hewett P, "Rating exposure control using Bayesian decision analysis" 3 : 568-581, 2006

      9 Rappaport SM, "Quantitative exposure assessment. S. Rappaport"

      10 Logan P, "Occupational exposure decisions: can limited data interpretation training help improve accuracy?" 2009

      1 피영규, "우리나라 석면함유제품 취급 사업장의 공기 중 석면 농도의 시간적 변화" 한국산업보건학회 26 (26): 454-465, 2016

      2 Ramachandran G, "Toward better exposure assessment strategies - the new NIOSH initiative" 52 : 297-301, 2008

      3 Schinkel J, "The Advanced REACH Tool (ART): incorporation of an exposure measurement database" 2013

      4 Tielemans E, "Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm" 52 : 443-454, 2008

      5 van de Ven P, "Stoffenmanager exposure model: company-specific exposure assessments using a Bayesian methodology" 7 : 216-223, 2010

      6 Ramachandran G, "Retrospective exposure assessment using Bayesian methods" 45 : 651-667, 2001

      7 Chen YC, "Retrospective exposure assessment in a chemical research and development facility" 39 : 111-121, 2012

      8 Hewett P, "Rating exposure control using Bayesian decision analysis" 3 : 568-581, 2006

      9 Rappaport SM, "Quantitative exposure assessment. S. Rappaport"

      10 Logan P, "Occupational exposure decisions: can limited data interpretation training help improve accuracy?" 2009

      11 Leidel NA, "Occupational Exposure Sampling Strategy Manual" National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 1977

      12 Ten Berge WF, "Mathematical models for estimating occupational exposure to chemicals" AIHA 2000

      13 Lee EG, "Exposure models for the prior distribution in Bayesian decision analysis for occupational hygiene decision making" 10 : 97-108, 2013

      14 Vadali M, "Exposure modeling in occupational hygiene decision making" 6 : 353-362, 2009

      15 Vadali M, "Exposure modeling in occupational hygiene decision making" 6 : 353-362, 2009

      16 Waters M, "Exposure estimation and interpretation of occupational risk: Enhanced information for the occupational risk manager" 12 : S99-S111, 2015

      17 ECETOC TRA, "European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals" 2004

      18 Vadali M, "Effect of training, education, professional experience, and need for cognition on accuracy of exposure assessment decision-making" 2011

      19 Logan PW, "Desktop study of occupational exposure judgments: do education and experience influence accuracy?" 8 : 746-758, 2011

      20 Rasmuson JO, "Cumulative Retrospective Exposure Assessment (REA) as a predictor of amphibole asbestos lung burden: validation procedures and results for industrial hygiene and pathology estimates" 26 : 1-3, 2014

      21 Zhang Y, "Bayesian modeling of exposure and airflow using two-zone models" 2009

      22 Banerjee S, "Bayesian hierarchical framework for occupational hygiene decision making" 58 : 1079-1093, 2014

      23 Ramachandran G, "Bayesian analysis for inversion of aerosol size distribution data" 27 : 1099-1112, 1996

      24 Hsu HI, "Assessing long-term oil mist exposures for workers in a fastener manufacturing industry using the Bayesian decision analysis technique" 12 : 834-842, 2012

      25 Sottas PE, "An empirical hierarchical Bayesian unification of occupational exposure assessment methods" 28 : 75-93, 2009

      26 Schinkel J, "Advanced REACH Tool (ART): calibration of the mechanistic model" 13 : 1374-1382, 2011

      27 Mulhausen J, "A strategy for assessing and managing occupational exposures" AIHA 2006

      28 Bullock WH, "A strategy for assessing and managing occupational exposures" AIHA 2006

      29 Torres C, "A model to systematically employ professional judgment in the Bayesian decision analysis for a semiconductor industry exposure assessment" 11 : 343-353, 2014

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0.343 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼