RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      평화협정의 유형 분석 = 이스라엘-팔레스타인 평화협정 체결 과정을 중심으로

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A peace agreement is an extensive document of a legal and political nature, drafted to assure peace between two or more states. The agreement not only brings conflict to an end, but also institutionalizes reconciliation and coexistence. Nonetheless, the peace agreement itself does not necessarily guarantee peace. It is not a single agreement that terminates disputes, but a series of agreements that are brought into force during the process of resolution. Hence, one needs to understand peace agreement as a process — beginning with the termination of conflict and culminating in a state of peace. Peace treaties signed in the process of peacebuilding may be categorized into three different types in accordance with the situation which they are concluded in. In this article, I categorize peace agreements between Israel and Palestine into the following three types: the preliminary basic agreement, the actual fundamental agreement, and the complementary practiced agreement. Categorizing peace agreements in this way would clarify and enhance our understanding about their nature. Peace agreements should be approached as management mechanisms for institutionalized conflicts that take on a strategic and consecutive form in order to allow transition.
      번역하기

      A peace agreement is an extensive document of a legal and political nature, drafted to assure peace between two or more states. The agreement not only brings conflict to an end, but also institutionalizes reconciliation and coexistence. Nonetheless, t...

      A peace agreement is an extensive document of a legal and political nature, drafted to assure peace between two or more states. The agreement not only brings conflict to an end, but also institutionalizes reconciliation and coexistence. Nonetheless, the peace agreement itself does not necessarily guarantee peace. It is not a single agreement that terminates disputes, but a series of agreements that are brought into force during the process of resolution. Hence, one needs to understand peace agreement as a process — beginning with the termination of conflict and culminating in a state of peace. Peace treaties signed in the process of peacebuilding may be categorized into three different types in accordance with the situation which they are concluded in. In this article, I categorize peace agreements between Israel and Palestine into the following three types: the preliminary basic agreement, the actual fundamental agreement, and the complementary practiced agreement. Categorizing peace agreements in this way would clarify and enhance our understanding about their nature. Peace agreements should be approached as management mechanisms for institutionalized conflicts that take on a strategic and consecutive form in order to allow transition.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼