Since Evan Stark systematized the concept of coercive control in 2007 and sparked international attention, both the UK and Australia have criminalized coercive control as a form of domestic violence. The criminalization of coercive control and the red...
Since Evan Stark systematized the concept of coercive control in 2007 and sparked international attention, both the UK and Australia have criminalized coercive control as a form of domestic violence. The criminalization of coercive control and the redefinition of domestic violence around this concept have enabled the recognition of the underlying patterns of control that had previously remained invisible within intimate partner violence. Amid this paradigm shift, countries like the UK and Australia have moved beyond an incident-based understanding of domestic violence centered on physical abuse, toward a broader recognition of domestic abuse as a pattern of ongoing control that includes non-physical forms of violence. In contrast, South Korea has yet to engage in substantial public discourse on coercive control, and no legal framework for addressing it has been established.
This paper examines how the criminal offense of coercive control has been regulated over the past ten years in England and Wales, the first jurisdiction to criminalize such behavior, focusing on its current application and limitations. It also analyzes the life of Sally Challen, which is widely regarded as a landmark case in the legal discourse on coercive control.
Sally Challen, a victim of coercive control, killed her abusive husband, and her charge was reduced from murder to manslaughter on the grounds of mental disorders — marking the first case in legal history where being a victim of coercive control was considered in such a context. The fact that the 2023 revised sentencing guidelines for domestic homicide are colloquially referred to as “Sally’s Law” reflects this historical significance. Though belated, the law on coercive control ultimately helped to rescue Sally Challen’s life—and in turn, her life inspired the continued evolution of that very law.
In the current context of South Korea, where social and legal discourse on coercive control is only just beginning, a close examination of Sally Challen’s life and her legal proceedings is a necessary task—one that breathes life into abstract legal concepts by grounding them in the lived experiences of women who have experienced coercive control.