The Seonmun Gyusik - Dharma Door’s Regulations and forms - is a practice guide of Chinese Dhyana School. A variety of the Soenmun Gyusik are based on its spiritual origination from Seon master, Baizhang Huai Hai(百丈懷海). In this paper, I want ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102090572
2016
-
200
KCI등재
학술저널
65-99(35쪽)
2
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The Seonmun Gyusik - Dharma Door’s Regulations and forms - is a practice guide of Chinese Dhyana School. A variety of the Soenmun Gyusik are based on its spiritual origination from Seon master, Baizhang Huai Hai(百丈懷海). In this paper, I want ...
The Seonmun Gyusik - Dharma Door’s Regulations and forms - is a practice guide of Chinese Dhyana School. A variety of the Soenmun Gyusik are based on its spiritual origination from Seon master, Baizhang Huai Hai(百丈懷海). In this paper, I want to take a look on the contents and its historical, theoretical, and cultural meanings which the early pure regulations of Seon Centers had. The Pure Regulations of Seon Centers, called as the name of Seonmun Gyusik, lets us know exactly what its identification and the theoretical, cultural meanings of Dhyana Schools are. The early Seon masters made their livings poor but pure by establishing practice centers around mountains. They concentrated on rather exploring the essence as religious practitioners than being tied by forms or regulations. After then, the numbers of practice community were getting increasing. Therefore they wanted to set up the pure regulations for making the practice life systemically. Hence they were able to keep Dharma and make their poor but pure practice lives. There were three reasons why the pure regulations of Seon centers were made. They are social, political, and theoretical reasons. The social factor was because of the recognition of Monks lives as ‘Not working and Just playing’. Especially, the development of Buddhism and the prosperity of temple economy in the period of North and South dynasties faced criticisms of Nationalists more than before. They were about enormous money spent by establishing temples and making Buddha statues and stupas. Monks took actions against those criticisms with Bocheongbeop (Extensive pure dharma) of Seon Centers, which stressed on ‘一日不作 一日不食- No Work, No Meal’ in the end. And also there was the limitation of precepts legislated in India. That is, the Buddhism transmitted to China, which had a different natural, cultural environment, faced various limitations, when it comes to keeping precepts. Of course, it was not harmonized with Chinese customs and cultures, but there was the content, which practitioners could not keep in Chinese natural environment inevitably. As a result, it came to the need of establishing precepts, which were suitable for the reality of Chinese society. Such a social demand was in the end connected to the legislation of the pure regulations of Seon Centers. For the political reason, monks in the political crisis of the period of North and South dynasties and the dominating central distract of Northen ethnics tried to seek the social integration and strengthen emperor’s power by using Buddhism simultaneously. Therefore, they needed the integrated management system to dominate Sangha cluster. From this point, they made a Sangha system and control the assembly. Theoretically, the combination of Buddhist prajna thought and Ti - yong theory of Chinese traditional thought gave a birth to unique Seon thought, which put emphasis on the essence rather than phenomenon. It is called, the unity of precepts and Seon, based on Shimseong - ron(心性論). I think this was the motivation of establishing the pure regulations of Seon centers with such a spirit. The establishment of the pure regulations of Seon centers means the sinization of precepts and Buddhism in the end. That is the change of the Buddhism by Chinese, for Chinese, and of Chinese. As the Buddhism born in India was transmitted to China, it was changed to Sino - Buddhism completely through the integration process for a long time. The pure regulations of Seon Centers shows well such a historical, cultural, and theoretical development process.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 허훈, "청규에서의 생활문화연구 : 의식주를 중심으로" 동국대학교 대학원 2007
2 정재일, "자각종색의 『선원청규』 연구" 동국대학교 대학원 2006
3 김명배, "백장청규의 茶禮 연구" 韓國茶學會 6 (6): 1-30, 2000
4 聖凱, "馬祖道一與中國禪宗文化" 中國社會科學出版社 466-, 2006
5 宗性, "馬祖道一與中國禪宗文化" 中國社會科學出版社 393-394, 2006
6 董群, "禪宗倫理" 浙江人民出版社 1-310, 2000
7 楊曾文, "禪宗與中國佛敎文化" 中國社會科學出版社 1-390, 2004
8 胡適, "禪學案" 正中書局 1-724, 1975
9 "百丈山大智禪師語錄"
10 허훈, "淸規와 禪院文化" 부다가야 1-319, 2008
1 허훈, "청규에서의 생활문화연구 : 의식주를 중심으로" 동국대학교 대학원 2007
2 정재일, "자각종색의 『선원청규』 연구" 동국대학교 대학원 2006
3 김명배, "백장청규의 茶禮 연구" 韓國茶學會 6 (6): 1-30, 2000
4 聖凱, "馬祖道一與中國禪宗文化" 中國社會科學出版社 466-, 2006
5 宗性, "馬祖道一與中國禪宗文化" 中國社會科學出版社 393-394, 2006
6 董群, "禪宗倫理" 浙江人民出版社 1-310, 2000
7 楊曾文, "禪宗與中國佛敎文化" 中國社會科學出版社 1-390, 2004
8 胡適, "禪學案" 正中書局 1-724, 1975
9 "百丈山大智禪師語錄"
10 허훈, "淸規와 禪院文化" 부다가야 1-319, 2008
11 "景德傳燈錄 권6"
12 "敕修百丈淸規 권6"
13 "廣弘明集 권7, 13"
14 "宋高僧傳 권10"
15 "大宋僧史略 권1"
16 "大乘無生方便門"
17 許正洙, "勅修百丈淸規에 관한 硏究" 東國大學校 佛敎大學院 1996
18 "出三藏記集 권11"
19 丁福保, "佛學大辭典 下" 上海出版社 1351-3002, 1991
20 王建光, "中國律宗思想硏究" 巴蜀書社 1-345, 2004
21 정성본, "中國禪宗의 成立史 硏究" 민족사 1-929, 1991
22 印順, "中國禪宗史" 江西人民出版社 1-346, 1999
23 洪修平, "中國禪學思想史綱" 南京大學出版社 1-267, 1994
24 道端良秀, "中國佛敎と社會との交涉" 平樂寺書店 1-318, 1980
25 허훈, "『禪苑淸規』의 職制變化에 대한 考察" 보조사상연구원 36 : 193-226, 2011
『시용향악보』 소재 <내당>·<삼성대왕>의 불교적 성격과 연원
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2028 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2022-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2016-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2012-05-14 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 재단법인 선학원 부설 한국불교선리연구원 -> 한국불교선리연구원 | ![]() |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.5 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.43 | 0.41 | 1.365 | 0 |