RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      「선문청규(禪門淸規)」의 교단사적 의의(意義)와 승려의 역할 = The Meaning of Religious History and the Role of Monks in the Seonmun Cheonggyu(Dharma Door`s Pure Regulations)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102090572

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Seonmun Gyusik - Dharma Door’s Regulations and forms - is a practice guide of Chinese Dhyana School. A variety of the Soenmun Gyusik are based on its spiritual origination from Seon master, Baizhang Huai Hai(百丈懷海). In this paper, I want to take a look on the contents and its historical, theoretical, and cultural meanings which the early pure regulations of Seon Centers had. The Pure Regulations of Seon Centers, called as the name of Seonmun Gyusik, lets us know exactly what its identification and the theoretical, cultural meanings of Dhyana Schools are. The early Seon masters made their livings poor but pure by establishing practice centers around mountains. They concentrated on rather exploring the essence as religious practitioners than being tied by forms or regulations. After then, the numbers of practice community were getting increasing. Therefore they wanted to set up the pure regulations for making the practice life systemically. Hence they were able to keep Dharma and make their poor but pure practice lives. There were three reasons why the pure regulations of Seon centers were made. They are social, political, and theoretical reasons. The social factor was because of the recognition of Monks lives as ‘Not working and Just playing’. Especially, the development of Buddhism and the prosperity of temple economy in the period of North and South dynasties faced criticisms of Nationalists more than before. They were about enormous money spent by establishing temples and making Buddha statues and stupas. Monks took actions against those criticisms with Bocheongbeop (Extensive pure dharma) of Seon Centers, which stressed on ‘一日不作 一日不食- No Work, No Meal’ in the end. And also there was the limitation of precepts legislated in India. That is, the Buddhism transmitted to China, which had a different natural, cultural environment, faced various limitations, when it comes to keeping precepts. Of course, it was not harmonized with Chinese customs and cultures, but there was the content, which practitioners could not keep in Chinese natural environment inevitably. As a result, it came to the need of establishing precepts, which were suitable for the reality of Chinese society. Such a social demand was in the end connected to the legislation of the pure regulations of Seon Centers. For the political reason, monks in the political crisis of the period of North and South dynasties and the dominating central distract of Northen ethnics tried to seek the social integration and strengthen emperor’s power by using Buddhism simultaneously. Therefore, they needed the integrated management system to dominate Sangha cluster. From this point, they made a Sangha system and control the assembly. Theoretically, the combination of Buddhist prajna thought and Ti - yong theory of Chinese traditional thought gave a birth to unique Seon thought, which put emphasis on the essence rather than phenomenon. It is called, the unity of precepts and Seon, based on Shimseong - ron(心性論). I think this was the motivation of establishing the pure regulations of Seon centers with such a spirit. The establishment of the pure regulations of Seon centers means the sinization of precepts and Buddhism in the end. That is the change of the Buddhism by Chinese, for Chinese, and of Chinese. As the Buddhism born in India was transmitted to China, it was changed to Sino - Buddhism completely through the integration process for a long time. The pure regulations of Seon Centers shows well such a historical, cultural, and theoretical development process.
      번역하기

      The Seonmun Gyusik - Dharma Door’s Regulations and forms - is a practice guide of Chinese Dhyana School. A variety of the Soenmun Gyusik are based on its spiritual origination from Seon master, Baizhang Huai Hai(百丈懷海). In this paper, I want ...

      The Seonmun Gyusik - Dharma Door’s Regulations and forms - is a practice guide of Chinese Dhyana School. A variety of the Soenmun Gyusik are based on its spiritual origination from Seon master, Baizhang Huai Hai(百丈懷海). In this paper, I want to take a look on the contents and its historical, theoretical, and cultural meanings which the early pure regulations of Seon Centers had. The Pure Regulations of Seon Centers, called as the name of Seonmun Gyusik, lets us know exactly what its identification and the theoretical, cultural meanings of Dhyana Schools are. The early Seon masters made their livings poor but pure by establishing practice centers around mountains. They concentrated on rather exploring the essence as religious practitioners than being tied by forms or regulations. After then, the numbers of practice community were getting increasing. Therefore they wanted to set up the pure regulations for making the practice life systemically. Hence they were able to keep Dharma and make their poor but pure practice lives. There were three reasons why the pure regulations of Seon centers were made. They are social, political, and theoretical reasons. The social factor was because of the recognition of Monks lives as ‘Not working and Just playing’. Especially, the development of Buddhism and the prosperity of temple economy in the period of North and South dynasties faced criticisms of Nationalists more than before. They were about enormous money spent by establishing temples and making Buddha statues and stupas. Monks took actions against those criticisms with Bocheongbeop (Extensive pure dharma) of Seon Centers, which stressed on ‘一日不作 一日不食- No Work, No Meal’ in the end. And also there was the limitation of precepts legislated in India. That is, the Buddhism transmitted to China, which had a different natural, cultural environment, faced various limitations, when it comes to keeping precepts. Of course, it was not harmonized with Chinese customs and cultures, but there was the content, which practitioners could not keep in Chinese natural environment inevitably. As a result, it came to the need of establishing precepts, which were suitable for the reality of Chinese society. Such a social demand was in the end connected to the legislation of the pure regulations of Seon Centers. For the political reason, monks in the political crisis of the period of North and South dynasties and the dominating central distract of Northen ethnics tried to seek the social integration and strengthen emperor’s power by using Buddhism simultaneously. Therefore, they needed the integrated management system to dominate Sangha cluster. From this point, they made a Sangha system and control the assembly. Theoretically, the combination of Buddhist prajna thought and Ti - yong theory of Chinese traditional thought gave a birth to unique Seon thought, which put emphasis on the essence rather than phenomenon. It is called, the unity of precepts and Seon, based on Shimseong - ron(心性論). I think this was the motivation of establishing the pure regulations of Seon centers with such a spirit. The establishment of the pure regulations of Seon centers means the sinization of precepts and Buddhism in the end. That is the change of the Buddhism by Chinese, for Chinese, and of Chinese. As the Buddhism born in India was transmitted to China, it was changed to Sino - Buddhism completely through the integration process for a long time. The pure regulations of Seon Centers shows well such a historical, cultural, and theoretical development process.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 허훈, "청규에서의 생활문화연구 : 의식주를 중심으로" 동국대학교 대학원 2007

      2 정재일, "자각종색의 『선원청규』 연구" 동국대학교 대학원 2006

      3 김명배, "백장청규의 茶禮 연구" 韓國茶學會 6 (6): 1-30, 2000

      4 聖凱, "馬祖道一與中國禪宗文化" 中國社會科學出版社 466-, 2006

      5 宗性, "馬祖道一與中國禪宗文化" 中國社會科學出版社 393-394, 2006

      6 董群, "禪宗倫理" 浙江人民出版社 1-310, 2000

      7 楊曾文, "禪宗與中國佛敎文化" 中國社會科學出版社 1-390, 2004

      8 胡適, "禪學案" 正中書局 1-724, 1975

      9 "百丈山大智禪師語錄"

      10 허훈, "淸規와 禪院文化" 부다가야 1-319, 2008

      1 허훈, "청규에서의 생활문화연구 : 의식주를 중심으로" 동국대학교 대학원 2007

      2 정재일, "자각종색의 『선원청규』 연구" 동국대학교 대학원 2006

      3 김명배, "백장청규의 茶禮 연구" 韓國茶學會 6 (6): 1-30, 2000

      4 聖凱, "馬祖道一與中國禪宗文化" 中國社會科學出版社 466-, 2006

      5 宗性, "馬祖道一與中國禪宗文化" 中國社會科學出版社 393-394, 2006

      6 董群, "禪宗倫理" 浙江人民出版社 1-310, 2000

      7 楊曾文, "禪宗與中國佛敎文化" 中國社會科學出版社 1-390, 2004

      8 胡適, "禪學案" 正中書局 1-724, 1975

      9 "百丈山大智禪師語錄"

      10 허훈, "淸規와 禪院文化" 부다가야 1-319, 2008

      11 "景德傳燈錄 권6"

      12 "敕修百丈淸規 권6"

      13 "廣弘明集 권7, 13"

      14 "宋高僧傳 권10"

      15 "大宋僧史略 권1"

      16 "大乘無生方便門"

      17 許正洙, "勅修百丈淸規에 관한 硏究" 東國大學校 佛敎大學院 1996

      18 "出三藏記集 권11"

      19 丁福保, "佛學大辭典 下" 上海出版社 1351-3002, 1991

      20 王建光, "中國律宗思想硏究" 巴蜀書社 1-345, 2004

      21 정성본, "中國禪宗의 成立史 硏究" 민족사 1-929, 1991

      22 印順, "中國禪宗史" 江西人民出版社 1-346, 1999

      23 洪修平, "中國禪學思想史綱" 南京大學出版社 1-267, 1994

      24 道端良秀, "中國佛敎と社會との交涉" 平樂寺書店 1-318, 1980

      25 허훈, "『禪苑淸規』의 職制變化에 대한 考察" 보조사상연구원 36 : 193-226, 2011

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-05-14 학회명변경 한글명 : 재단법인 선학원 부설 한국불교선리연구원 -> 한국불교선리연구원 KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.56 0.56 0.5
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.43 0.41 1.365 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼