RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    꽃과 여인, 그 직유와 은유 = 이효석과 프루스트를 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101989887

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    It is very trite to compare the flower to the woman. But I`d like to try to compare the way of expression, the simile and the metaphor for the flowers in this essay. Two authors are selected because they are well known to use the comparison with flowers, Yi-Hyoseok and Marcel Proust. Yi-Hyoseok is incline to use the simile than the metaphor, Marcel Proust prefer the metaphor to the simile. The difference between the metaphors of Yi-Hyoseok and those of M. Proust is remarkable. The former uses the comparison, the simile for the flowers more directly and objectively, the latter uses the metaphor for the flowers more mediately and significantly. So it is easy to understand the meaning of the flower through the simile, but the metaphor has various significances according to the context. In that point, the reader has a space to participate in interpreting the flower symbols. The simile and the metaphor are particularly useful in the interpretation of flower symbols with the women. The author projected his secret desire for woman to the flowers with the metaphor and the reader need to read the novels more carefully to find the hint which comes the way to interpretation of the symbols. In this essay, I`d like to investigate the way of expression `flower-woman` and the effect of the simile and metaphor of two authors on the `flower-woman`.
    번역하기

    It is very trite to compare the flower to the woman. But I`d like to try to compare the way of expression, the simile and the metaphor for the flowers in this essay. Two authors are selected because they are well known to use the comparison with flowe...

    It is very trite to compare the flower to the woman. But I`d like to try to compare the way of expression, the simile and the metaphor for the flowers in this essay. Two authors are selected because they are well known to use the comparison with flowers, Yi-Hyoseok and Marcel Proust. Yi-Hyoseok is incline to use the simile than the metaphor, Marcel Proust prefer the metaphor to the simile. The difference between the metaphors of Yi-Hyoseok and those of M. Proust is remarkable. The former uses the comparison, the simile for the flowers more directly and objectively, the latter uses the metaphor for the flowers more mediately and significantly. So it is easy to understand the meaning of the flower through the simile, but the metaphor has various significances according to the context. In that point, the reader has a space to participate in interpreting the flower symbols. The simile and the metaphor are particularly useful in the interpretation of flower symbols with the women. The author projected his secret desire for woman to the flowers with the metaphor and the reader need to read the novels more carefully to find the hint which comes the way to interpretation of the symbols. In this essay, I`d like to investigate the way of expression `flower-woman` and the effect of the simile and metaphor of two authors on the `flower-woman`.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.6 0.6 0.6
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.6 0.63 1.017 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼