RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      변액연금보험 최저연금적립금보증 요구자본 계산 시 확률론적 시나리오 방식 적용 연구 = Determination of Required Capital for Guaranteed Minimum Accumulation Benefits Embedded in Variable Annuities Via a Method Based on Stochastic Scenarios

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82492573

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In Korea, required capital for guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (hereafter GMAB) is calculated by subtracting an amount of reserves for the guarantee from a 2% of the insured`s reserves for variable annuities. However, the 2% rule may not be adequate to determine a proper amount of required capital for the GMAB. This study investigates how much a required capital for the GMAB varies when the calculation of required capital is implemented via a stochastic simulation method. Generating stochastic scenarios for a stock fund, a bond fund, and a balanced fund with the geometric brownian motion and exponential vasicek model, we calculate amounts of required capital for the GMAB. In order to check the adequacy of the scenarios, we compare the calibration criteria of the scenarios with those of scenarios proposed by C-3 Phase Ⅱ in the United States. From the analysis, we find that there are significant differences in required capitals between when the 2% rule applies and when the stochastic simulation method applies. In particular, we found that the 2% rule is inappropriate for calculating required capital of ratchet style GMAB. Finally, we suggest future research to propose better stochastic scenarios to enhance these types of studies and to study how to reflect a risk shifting via hedging and reinsurance or a risk controlling through adopting rules for underwriting and investments to calculate required capital.
      번역하기

      In Korea, required capital for guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (hereafter GMAB) is calculated by subtracting an amount of reserves for the guarantee from a 2% of the insured`s reserves for variable annuities. However, the 2% rule may not be a...

      In Korea, required capital for guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (hereafter GMAB) is calculated by subtracting an amount of reserves for the guarantee from a 2% of the insured`s reserves for variable annuities. However, the 2% rule may not be adequate to determine a proper amount of required capital for the GMAB. This study investigates how much a required capital for the GMAB varies when the calculation of required capital is implemented via a stochastic simulation method. Generating stochastic scenarios for a stock fund, a bond fund, and a balanced fund with the geometric brownian motion and exponential vasicek model, we calculate amounts of required capital for the GMAB. In order to check the adequacy of the scenarios, we compare the calibration criteria of the scenarios with those of scenarios proposed by C-3 Phase Ⅱ in the United States. From the analysis, we find that there are significant differences in required capitals between when the 2% rule applies and when the stochastic simulation method applies. In particular, we found that the 2% rule is inappropriate for calculating required capital of ratchet style GMAB. Finally, we suggest future research to propose better stochastic scenarios to enhance these types of studies and to study how to reflect a risk shifting via hedging and reinsurance or a risk controlling through adopting rules for underwriting and investments to calculate required capital.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 금융감독원, "보험회사 위험기준 자기자본제도 해설서" 2009

      2 권용재, "변액연금보험의 최저보증옵션 현황 및 시사점" 보험연구원 2010

      3 이창수, "변액보험 보증옵션에 대한 리스크 평가" 2009

      4 권용재, "변액보험 보증리스크 관리 연구, 보험연구원 경영보고서" 보험연구원 2010

      5 한진희, "국민연금 재정추계를 위한 거시경제변수 전망" 한국개발연구원 2007

      6 Hardy, M. R., "Validation of long-term equity return models for equity-linked guarantees" 10 : 28-47, 2006

      7 Black, F., "The pricing of options and corporate liabilities" 81 : 637-653, 1973

      8 Shiller, R. J., "The life-cycle personal accounts proposal for social security: An evaluation" Cowles Foundation, Yale University 2005

      9 Milevsky, M. A., "The calculus of retirement income: Financial models for pension annuities and life insurance" Cambridge University Press 2006

      10 Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI), "Supplementary information for life insurance companies that determine segregated fund guarantee capital requirements using an approved model, Revised Advisory"

      1 금융감독원, "보험회사 위험기준 자기자본제도 해설서" 2009

      2 권용재, "변액연금보험의 최저보증옵션 현황 및 시사점" 보험연구원 2010

      3 이창수, "변액보험 보증옵션에 대한 리스크 평가" 2009

      4 권용재, "변액보험 보증리스크 관리 연구, 보험연구원 경영보고서" 보험연구원 2010

      5 한진희, "국민연금 재정추계를 위한 거시경제변수 전망" 한국개발연구원 2007

      6 Hardy, M. R., "Validation of long-term equity return models for equity-linked guarantees" 10 : 28-47, 2006

      7 Black, F., "The pricing of options and corporate liabilities" 81 : 637-653, 1973

      8 Shiller, R. J., "The life-cycle personal accounts proposal for social security: An evaluation" Cowles Foundation, Yale University 2005

      9 Milevsky, M. A., "The calculus of retirement income: Financial models for pension annuities and life insurance" Cambridge University Press 2006

      10 Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI), "Supplementary information for life insurance companies that determine segregated fund guarantee capital requirements using an approved model, Revised Advisory"

      11 Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI), "Revised guidance for companies that determine degregated fund guarantee capital requirement using an approved model, Draft Advisory"

      12 American Academy of Actuaries' life capital adequacy subcommittee, "Recommended approach for setting regulatory risk-based capital requirements for variable annuities and similar products"

      13 Itȏ, K., "On stochastic differential equations" 4 : 1-51, 1951

      14 Brandimarte, P., "Numerical methods in finance and economics, 2nd edition" Wiley 2006

      15 Brigo, D., "Interest-rate models: Theory and Practice" Springer 2006

      16 Baz, J., "Financial derivatives: Pricing, applications, and mathematics" Cambridge University Press 2004

      17 Fama, E. F., "Equity premium" 57 : 637-659, 2002

      18 Klaassen, P., "Economic capital: How it works and what every manager needs to know" Elsevier 2009

      19 Mueller, H., "Economic capital - Recent market developments and trends" Society of Actuaries 2003

      20 Canadian Institute of Actuaries, "Considerations in the valuation of segregated fund products, Educational Note" 2007

      21 Rubin, L., "Analysis of methods for determining margins for uncertainty under a principle-based framework for life insurance and annuity products, Life insurance research project" Society of Actuaries 2009

      22 Hardy, M. R., "An Introduction to Risk Measure for Actuarial Applications" University of Waterloo 2006

      23 "American Academy of Actuaries‘ life capital adequacy subcommittees' C-3 Phase 2 work group to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' capital adequacy task force, C3 Phase Ⅱ Risk-Based capital for variable annuities: Pre-Packaged scenarios"

      24 Dickson, D. C. M., "Actuarial mathematics for life contingent risks, International series on actuarial science" Cambridge University press 2009

      25 Hardy, M. R., "A regime-switching model of long-term stock returns" 5 : 41-53, 2001

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-05 학술지명변경 외국어명 : KOREAN INSURANCE JOURNAL -> KOREAN JOURNAL OF INSURANCE KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.89 0.89 1.04
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1 0.99 1.561 0.52
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼