반도체 IP 산업에서 지식기반 기업의 기술혁신 전략에 대한 사례연구

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 반도체 IP산업의 지식기반 기업에 있어 기술혁신전략에 대하여 분석한 것이다. 분석을 위한 이론적인 논의는 i)지식의 창조?보호?활용과 혁신에 관한 이론, ii)혁신으로부터 가치 창출에 대한 이론 iii)모듈화, 시장진입시기, 표준(지배적 디자인)의 등장?경쟁 등의 중심으로 수행되었다. 이러한 이론적인 선행 연구를 통해 지식기반 기업의 기술혁신전략에 대한 탐색적인 연구가설을 제시하였다. 그리고 최종적으로 이러한 반도체 IP산업의 대표적인 지식기반 기업으로 ARM과 INTEL의 기술혁신전략 사례 분석을 분석하여, 제시된 연구 가설들을 확인하였다.
첫째, 기술 주기에 있어 초기단계에 진입하는 지식기반기업은 i)상호보완적 자산(지식)에 대한 접근성이 낮아 수직 통합하는 기술 전략을 선택하며, ii)환경변화로 인한 산업의 가치사슬 분화에도 불구하고 수직결합적인 기술 전략을 주요한 방향으로 유지한다. 둘째, 기술 주기에 있어 후기단계에 진입하는 지식기반 기업은 i)상호보완적 지식자산에 대한 접근성이 높아져 계약거래를 통한 기술 혁신 전략을 선호하며, ii)보유한 지식자산에 있어 불연속적인 특징의 존재여부에 따라 기술 혁신 전략의 경로를 다르게 선택한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study analyzed the technology innovation strategies of knowledge-based companies in the semiconductor IP industry. The theoretical approaches of this study are to i) the creation, protection and utilization of knowledge and innovation, ii) value creation from innovation, iii) modularity, timing of market entry, and the emergence and competition of standard (dominant design). Based on the theoretical analysis, I presented exploratory research hypotheses.
Ultimately, this study examined the proposed hypotheses by conducting case studies on the technology innovation strategy of two leading knowledge-based companies in the semiconductor IP industry: ARM and INTEL.
First, knowledge-based companies entering in the early stage of the technology cycle select the vertically-integrated technology strategy because of lower access to complementary knowledge assets, and maintain the vertically-integrated technology strategy despite the environmental change-driven differentiation of industry"s value chain.
Second, knowledge-based companies entering in the later stage of the technology cycle prefer the contract-based technology strategy because of its increased accessibility to complementary knowledge assets, and choose a different path of innovation strategies depending on whether their asset has the feature of discontinuity or not.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문요약
• ABSTRACT
• Ⅰ. 연구배경
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
• Ⅲ. 반도체 IP 산업에서 지식기반 기업의 기술 혁신 전략에 대한 연구가설 도출
• Ⅳ. 반도체 IP 산업에서 지식기반 기업의 기술 혁신 전략의 사례 연구
• Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 문주현, "시스템반도체산업의 기술혁신패턴의 진화에 대한 연구" 한국기술혁신학회 14 (14): 320-342, 2011

2 한국반도체산업협회, "반도체IP 유통촉진 기반 조성사업 2010년도 결과보고서" 특허청 2010

3 박상순, "기초반도체공학" 형설출판사 2007

4 서의호, "기술변화와 혁신전략" 경문사 1997

5 김석관, "개방형 혁신의 산업별 특성과 시사점" 과학기술정책연구원 2008

6 Oliver E. Williamson, "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations" 22 (22): 233-261, 1976

7 Gassmann, O., "Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes" 2004

8 Grant, R .M., "Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm" 17 (17): 109-122, 1996

9 Nonaka, I., "The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process" 1 (1): 2-10, 2003

10 Nonaka, I., "The knowledge-creating company" Oxford University Press 1995

11 Nonaka, I., "The knowledge-creating company" 69 : 96-104, 1991

12 Choo, C. W., "The knowing organization. How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions" Oxford University Press 1998

13 Jacobides, M. G., "The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: explaining the institutional structure of production" 26 (26): 395-413, 2005

14 Arora, A., "The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour" 23 (23): 523-532, 1994

15 Ronold H. Coase, "The Nature of the Firm, In The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution and Development" Oxford University Press 18-33, 1993

16 Oliver E. Williamson, "The Economic Institutions of Capitalism" The Free Press 1985

17 Katz, M., "Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities" 94 : 822-841, 1986

18 Brusoni, S., "Technologies, product, organizations: opening the black box of modularity" 10 (10): 179-205, 2001

19 Breschi, S., "Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation" 110 : 388-410, 2000

20 Anderson, P., "Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change" 35 : 604-634, 1990

21 Schilling. M. A., "Strategic Management of Technological Innovation" McGraw Hill International Edition 2008

22 Nonaka, I., "SECI, Ba, and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation" 33 : 5-34, 2000

23 Alavi, M., "Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues" 25 (25): 107-133, 2001

24 Teece, D. J., "Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy" 15 (15): 285-305, 1986

25 Demsetz, H., "Ownership, Control, and the Firm" Basil Blackwell Ltd 1988

26 Chesbrough, H. W., "Open Innovation - The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology" Harvard Business School Press 2002

27 Chesbrough, H. W., "Open Business Models - How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape" Harvard Business School Press 2006

28 Levinthal, D., "Myopia of learning" 14 (14): 97-112, 1993

29 Pil, F.K., "Modularity: implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage" 31 : 995-1011, 2006

30 Sanchez, R., "Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design" 17 (17): 63-76, 1996

31 Gartner, "Market share : Semiconductor Intellectual Property worldwide 2010"

32 Baldwin, C. Y., "Managing in an age of modularity" 75 (75): 84-93, 1997

33 Iansiti, M., "Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability" Harvard Business School Press 2004

34 iSuppli, "Intel’s Semiconductor Market Share Surges to More Than 10-Year High in 2011"

35 Urabe, K., "Innovation and the Japanese management system, In Innovation and management international comparisons" Walter de Gruyter 1988

36 Popadiuka, S., "Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related?" 26 : 302-312, 2006

37 Chesbrough, H. W., "How open innovation can help you cope in lean times" 87 (87): 68-76, 2009

38 Lieberman, M. B., "First-mover advantages" 9 (9): 41-58, 1988

39 Boulding, W., "First-Mover Disadvantage" 79 (79): 20-21, 2001

40 Dibiaggio, L., "Design complexity, vertical disintegration and knowledge organization in the semiconductor industry" 16 (16): 239-267, 2007

41 Baldwin, C. Y., "Design Rules: The Power of Modularity" MIT Press 2000

42 Teece, D. J., "Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets" 40 (40): 55-79, 1998

43 Jacobides, M. G., "Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures" 35 : 1200-1221, 2006

44 Fujimoto, T., "Architecture-based comparative advantage – a design information view of manufacturing" 4 (4): 55-112, 2007

45 Henderson, R., "Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms" 35 (35): 9-30, 1990

46 Utterback, James M., "A Dynamic Model of Product and Process Innovation" 3 (3): 639-656, 1975

47 Chesbrough, H. W., "A Better Way to Innovate" 12-13, 2003

48 IC insights, "13 Fabless IC Suppliers Forecast to Top $1.0 Billion in Sales in 2010"