RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Consumer Perceived Risk in the Korean Mobile Phone Market

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103731447

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Purpose This study aims to illustrate the relationship be – -tween demographic factors and perceived risk types, supposingthat Korean customers tend to postpone buying or hesitate topurchase the new version of hand sets, because of an earlybuying risk.
      Research design, data, and methodology- Inadditiontoexisting perceived risk types, the authors introduced an early buying risk. In order to measure each variable, also, the study hasemployed a five-point Liker-scale. To increase research reliabilityandvalidity,theresearchadoptedanexploratoryfactoranalysis,a confirmatory factor analysis, and one-way ANOVA.
      Results- First, there were statistically significant differencesbetween financial risk and the group. Second, there weren’t anystatistically significant differences between the group meansamong the four perceived risk types (Performance Risk, SocialRisk, Psychological Risk, and Physical Risk) and 4 factors(Gender, Age, Job, and Education). Lastly, job is apparently differentiated from others (Gender, Age, and Education).
      Conclusions The authors found that customers regarded an –early buying risk as one of the important perceived risk types,when purchasing a hand set.
      번역하기

      Purpose This study aims to illustrate the relationship be – -tween demographic factors and perceived risk types, supposingthat Korean customers tend to postpone buying or hesitate topurchase the new version of hand sets, because of an earlybuying ri...

      Purpose This study aims to illustrate the relationship be – -tween demographic factors and perceived risk types, supposingthat Korean customers tend to postpone buying or hesitate topurchase the new version of hand sets, because of an earlybuying risk.
      Research design, data, and methodology- Inadditiontoexisting perceived risk types, the authors introduced an early buying risk. In order to measure each variable, also, the study hasemployed a five-point Liker-scale. To increase research reliabilityandvalidity,theresearchadoptedanexploratoryfactoranalysis,a confirmatory factor analysis, and one-way ANOVA.
      Results- First, there were statistically significant differencesbetween financial risk and the group. Second, there weren’t anystatistically significant differences between the group meansamong the four perceived risk types (Performance Risk, SocialRisk, Psychological Risk, and Physical Risk) and 4 factors(Gender, Age, Job, and Education). Lastly, job is apparently differentiated from others (Gender, Age, and Education).
      Conclusions The authors found that customers regarded an –early buying risk as one of the important perceived risk types,when purchasing a hand set.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Asia Economy Daily, "What the matter with Galaxy S4? Decreasing sales during the third quarter. Why?"

      2 Shimp, T. A., "Warranty and Other Extrinsic Cue Effects on Consumers’ Risk Perceptions" 9 (9): 38-46, 1982

      3 Bergadaa, M., "The purchasing risk: how is it managed by the consumers?" 2005

      4 Beneke, J., "The influence of perceived risk on purchase intent : the case of premium grocery private label brands in South Africa" 21 (21): 4-14, 2012

      5 Locander, W. B., "The effect of self-confidence and anxiety on information seeking consumer risk-reduction" 16 (16): 268-274, 1979

      6 Asembri, C. A., "The effect of consumers’ planned products holding time on risk perception and acceptability" City University of New York 1986

      7 Jacoby, J., "The components of perceived risk, In M. Venkatesan(Ed" The Association for Consumer Research 2 : 382-393, 1972

      8 Taylor, J. W., "The Role of Risk in Consumer Behavior" 38 (38): 54-60, 1974

      9 Shapiro, B. P., "The Psychology of Pricing" 46 : 14-25, 1968

      10 Grewal, D., "The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-Perceived Risk Relationship" 21 (21): 145-153, 1994

      1 Asia Economy Daily, "What the matter with Galaxy S4? Decreasing sales during the third quarter. Why?"

      2 Shimp, T. A., "Warranty and Other Extrinsic Cue Effects on Consumers’ Risk Perceptions" 9 (9): 38-46, 1982

      3 Bergadaa, M., "The purchasing risk: how is it managed by the consumers?" 2005

      4 Beneke, J., "The influence of perceived risk on purchase intent : the case of premium grocery private label brands in South Africa" 21 (21): 4-14, 2012

      5 Locander, W. B., "The effect of self-confidence and anxiety on information seeking consumer risk-reduction" 16 (16): 268-274, 1979

      6 Asembri, C. A., "The effect of consumers’ planned products holding time on risk perception and acceptability" City University of New York 1986

      7 Jacoby, J., "The components of perceived risk, In M. Venkatesan(Ed" The Association for Consumer Research 2 : 382-393, 1972

      8 Taylor, J. W., "The Role of Risk in Consumer Behavior" 38 (38): 54-60, 1974

      9 Shapiro, B. P., "The Psychology of Pricing" 46 : 14-25, 1968

      10 Grewal, D., "The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-Perceived Risk Relationship" 21 (21): 145-153, 1994

      11 Murray, K. B., "The Impact of Services Versus Goods on Consumer’s Assessment of Perceived Risk and Variability" 18 (18): 51-65, 1990

      12 Dowling, G. R., "The Elgar Companion to Consumer Rand Economic Psychology" Edward Elgar 419-424, 1999

      13 Johnson, D. L., "Risky-shift phenomenon as tested with consumer products as stimuli" 20 (20): 328-385, 1971

      14 Knight, F. H., "Risk, Uncertainty and Profit" Houghton-Mifflin 1921

      15 Hammitt, J. K., "Risk perceptions and food choice: An exploratory analysis of organic- versus conventional-produce buyers" 10 (10): 367-374, 1990

      16 Mitchell, V. W., "Risk perception and reduction in the purchase of consumer services" 13 (13): 179-200, 1993

      17 Cunningham, S., "Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior" Harvard Business School 82-108, 1967

      18 Bettman, J. R., "Relationship of information-processing attitude structures to private brand purchasing behavior" 59 (59): 79-83, 1974

      19 White, J. D., "Price-quality Integration in Warranty Premium" 19 : 109-125, 1989

      20 Williams, P. R. D., "Perceived risks of Conventional and Organic Produce: Pesticides, Pathogens, and Natural Toxins" 21 (21): 319-330, 2001

      21 Bruwer, J., "Perceived risk, risk-reduction strategies(RRS)and consumption occasions;Roles in the wine consumer’s purchase decision" 25 (25): 369-390, 2013

      22 Derbaix, C., "Perceived risk and risk believers : an empirical investigation" 3 : 19-38, 1983

      23 Cox, D. F., "Perceived risk and consumer decision-making : The case of telephone shopping" 1 (1): 32-39, 1964

      24 Spence, H. E., "Perceived Risk in Mail-Order and Retail Store Buying" 7 (7): 364-369, 1970

      25 Bettman, J. R., "Perceived Risk and Its Components : A Model and Empirical Test" 10 (10): 184-190, 1973

      26 Stone, R. N., "Perceived Risk : Further considerations for the Marketing Discipline" 27 (27): 39-50, 1993

      27 Laurent, G., "Measuring consumer involvement profiles" 22 (22): 41-53, 1985

      28 Bettman, J. R., "Information Integration in Consumer Risk Perception : A Comparison of Two Modes of Component Conceptualisation" 60 (60): 381-385, 1975

      29 Mieres, C. G., "Influence of perceived risk on store brand proneness" 34 (34): 761-772, 2006

      30 Richardson, P. S., "Household store brand proneness : A framework" 72 (72): 159-185, 1996

      31 Arslan, Y., "Examining Perceived Risk and Its Influence on Attitudes : A Study on Private Label Consumers in Turkey" 9 (9): 158-166, 2013

      32 Dodds, W. B., "Effects of Price, Brand and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluation" 28 (28): 307-319, 1991

      33 정락채, "Do Quality-Focused Retailer Brand Types Contribute to Building Store Loyalty in Korea?" 한국유통과학회 11 (11): 5-15, 2013

      34 Ho, S. S. M., "Customers’ risk perceptions of electronic payment systems" 12 (12): 26-38, 1994

      35 Jasper, C. R., "Customers’ perception of risk and the purchase of apparel from catalogs" 8 (8): 23-36, 1994

      36 Dick, A., "Correlates of store brand proneness : some empirical observations" 4 (4): 15-22, 1995

      37 Olsen, J. E., "Consumer self-confidence in wine purchase" 15 (15): 40-51, 2003

      38 Roselius, E., "Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods" 35 (35): 56-61, 1971

      39 Mitchell, V. W., "Consumer Risk Perception in the UK Wine Market" 22 (22): 5-15, 1988

      40 Schiffman, L. G., "Consumer Behaviour" Frenchs Forest 2011

      41 Bauer, R. A., "Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking. in Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World" American Marketing Association 389-398, 1960

      42 Kaplan, L. B., "Components of Perceived Risk in Product Purchase : A Cross-Validation" 59 (59): 287-291, 1974

      43 Hankookilbo, "As you buy a smart-phone, you will see a new model. The principle that a new smart-phone model would be launched per year will be broken soon"

      44 Oglethorpe, J. E., "An examination of the Determinants of Perceived Risk and Acceptability of Hazardous Products and Activities. unpublished dissertation" College of Business Administration, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 1988

      45 Brooker, G., "Advances in Consumer Research, 11" Association for Consumer Research 439-441, 1984

      46 Tull, D. S., "A Note on the Relationship of price and Imputed quality" 37 (37): 186-191, 1964

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-24 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Academy Of Distribution Science -> Korea Distribution Science Association
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.72 0.72 0.69
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.7 0.72 0.762 0.31
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼