RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    추론에서 나타나는 배경의 중요성 = The Importance of Background in Reasoning

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110280958

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper aims to present the structure of practical reasoning and emphasize the role that background plays in it. Formal logic, centered on the relationship between premises and conclusions, is a product of modernity that pursued certainty. Modern thinkers sought a universal understanding that could penetrate an unstable and disordered world. Mathematical language was a means to reach that standard. For them, concepts and logic that excluded ambiguity were the means to guarantee necessary and unchanging knowledge. This perspective presupposes a representationalist view of language, which holds that language and logic faithfully reflect the world. However, modern pragmatics opposes the representationalism which posits that the meaning of language comes from its correspondence with the world. Instead, the meaning of language comes from its use. The pragmatist claim that meaning is determined within context and relationships also applies to argumentation. The argument models of Stephen E. Toulmin and Norman Fairclough move beyond formal logic which emphasizes only the relationship between premises and conclusions, to focus on the background of the argument. This is necessary for their application to concrete problems. Language and logic are influenced by users and usage contexts; furthermore, this relationship is not detached from issues of power.
    번역하기

    This paper aims to present the structure of practical reasoning and emphasize the role that background plays in it. Formal logic, centered on the relationship between premises and conclusions, is a product of modernity that pursued certainty. Modern t...

    This paper aims to present the structure of practical reasoning and emphasize the role that background plays in it. Formal logic, centered on the relationship between premises and conclusions, is a product of modernity that pursued certainty. Modern thinkers sought a universal understanding that could penetrate an unstable and disordered world. Mathematical language was a means to reach that standard. For them, concepts and logic that excluded ambiguity were the means to guarantee necessary and unchanging knowledge. This perspective presupposes a representationalist view of language, which holds that language and logic faithfully reflect the world. However, modern pragmatics opposes the representationalism which posits that the meaning of language comes from its correspondence with the world. Instead, the meaning of language comes from its use. The pragmatist claim that meaning is determined within context and relationships also applies to argumentation. The argument models of Stephen E. Toulmin and Norman Fairclough move beyond formal logic which emphasizes only the relationship between premises and conclusions, to focus on the background of the argument. This is necessary for their application to concrete problems. Language and logic are influenced by users and usage contexts; furthermore, this relationship is not detached from issues of power.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼