RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      핵심역량을 고려한 투자협상모형의 개발

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99883167

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the process of investment negotiation, the investor and the enterprise have different opinions causing conflicts. Therefore, we need an objective standard to mitigate the conflicts between the investor and the enterprise, and need to make constant improvement to achieve a rational investment. Therefore, this paper presents an investment negotiation model which enables investment allocation regarding the core competences among companies. The presented model can mitigate the structure of conflicts between the investor and the enterprise considering idiosyncratic investment that is caused when the core competences is converted into power, and could be used in forming sustainable optimal alternatives in the process of dynamically changing negotiation.
      번역하기

      In the process of investment negotiation, the investor and the enterprise have different opinions causing conflicts. Therefore, we need an objective standard to mitigate the conflicts between the investor and the enterprise, and need to make constant ...

      In the process of investment negotiation, the investor and the enterprise have different opinions causing conflicts. Therefore, we need an objective standard to mitigate the conflicts between the investor and the enterprise, and need to make constant improvement to achieve a rational investment. Therefore, this paper presents an investment negotiation model which enables investment allocation regarding the core competences among companies. The presented model can mitigate the structure of conflicts between the investor and the enterprise considering idiosyncratic investment that is caused when the core competences is converted into power, and could be used in forming sustainable optimal alternatives in the process of dynamically changing negotiation.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 투자협상모형
      • 3. 투자협상
      • 4. 수치예제
      • 5. 결론
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 투자협상모형
      • 3. 투자협상
      • 4. 수치예제
      • 5. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박창순, "공급사슬내 협력요소를 고려한 투자배분 모형의 개발" 한국SCM학회 6 (6): 49-56, 2006

      2 Hall, J. C, "Venture Capitalists’ Decision Criteria in New Venture Evaluation" 8 (8): 25-42, 1993

      3 Ramanathan, R, "Using AHP for Resource Allocation Problems" 80 (80): 410-417, 1995

      4 Prahald, C. K, "The Core Competence of the Corporation" 5 : 79-91, 1990

      5 Dahl, R. A, "The Concept of Power" 2 (2): 201-218, 1957

      6 Zartman, I. W., "The 50% Solution" Yale University Press 1983

      7 Epstein, L. G, "Substitution, Risk Aversion and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns, a Theoretical Framework" 57 (57): 937-969, 1989

      8 Rubinstein, M., "Strong Case for the Generalized Logarithmic Utility Model as the Premier Model of Financial Markets" 31 (31): 551-571, 1976

      9 Mario, E, "Project Selection by Constrained Fuzzy AHP" 3 (3): 39-62, 2004

      10 Emerson, R. M., "Power-Dependence Relations" 27 (27): 31-41, 1962

      1 박창순, "공급사슬내 협력요소를 고려한 투자배분 모형의 개발" 한국SCM학회 6 (6): 49-56, 2006

      2 Hall, J. C, "Venture Capitalists’ Decision Criteria in New Venture Evaluation" 8 (8): 25-42, 1993

      3 Ramanathan, R, "Using AHP for Resource Allocation Problems" 80 (80): 410-417, 1995

      4 Prahald, C. K, "The Core Competence of the Corporation" 5 : 79-91, 1990

      5 Dahl, R. A, "The Concept of Power" 2 (2): 201-218, 1957

      6 Zartman, I. W., "The 50% Solution" Yale University Press 1983

      7 Epstein, L. G, "Substitution, Risk Aversion and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns, a Theoretical Framework" 57 (57): 937-969, 1989

      8 Rubinstein, M., "Strong Case for the Generalized Logarithmic Utility Model as the Premier Model of Financial Markets" 31 (31): 551-571, 1976

      9 Mario, E, "Project Selection by Constrained Fuzzy AHP" 3 (3): 39-62, 2004

      10 Emerson, R. M., "Power-Dependence Relations" 27 (27): 31-41, 1962

      11 Habbeb, W. M., "Power and Tactics in International Negotiation" Johns Hopkins University Press 1988

      12 Emmer, S., "Optimal Portfolios with Bounded Capital-at-Risk" 11 (11): 365-384, 2001

      13 Claude, C, "Global Business Negotiations: a Pratical Guide" Thomson Learning 2004

      14 Roger, F, "Getting to Yes" Penguin Books 1991

      15 Belmiro, P. M. D, "Developing a Projects Evaluation System Based on Multiple Attribute Value Theory" 33 (33): 1488-1504, 2006

      16 Khorramshahgol, R, "Delphic Hierarchy Process (DHP): A Methodology for Priority Setting Derived from the Delphi Method and Analytical Hierarchy Process" 37 (37): 347-354, 1988

      17 Liveratore, M. j., "An Extention of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Industrial R&D Project Selection" EM-34 (EM-34): 12-18, 1987

      18 Saaty, T. L., "A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures" 15 (15): 234-281, 1977

      19 Mohanty, R. P., "A Fuzzy ANP-based Approach to R&D Project Selection: a Case Study" 43 (43): 5199-5216, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.76 0.76 0.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.48 0.46 0.488 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼