RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      連体動詞の属性と状態性 = A state and the property pattern on attributive verb

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101495189

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      It will be able to say that the next demonstration so far, are summarized.
      Although, in Japanese sentence structure, adjectives and nouns can be used predicatively, they lack motional [active] expressions. So, mainly, their primary function is to indicate stativity.
      In the case of the predicate verb, [active] means a major feature, but the significant semantic function of the status property can not be overlooked.
      The predicate verb that includes stativity has state condition from the beginning or sometimes it has the condition, depending on the sentence structure.
      This paper specifies sentences that attains the stative meaning by [Properties] as well as by syntactic structure.
      [Changes steady state], but not invariant to perform the change, condition persists for type [adjective persistent state changes] will be. And finally, after a temporary change lasting Temporary changes in steady state can be mentioned.
      State of verb et al would then take on a strong “state property” and is located in the attributive predicate is closely related to the main noun, it should be considered as one group.
      Compared to the predicate is a predicate overdue order Status Name stands out was discussion about the limitations of predicate types. As a result, when indicates stativity, the “ru” shows its limit to some extent limit.
      번역하기

      It will be able to say that the next demonstration so far, are summarized. Although, in Japanese sentence structure, adjectives and nouns can be used predicatively, they lack motional [active] expressions. So, mainly, their primary function is to i...

      It will be able to say that the next demonstration so far, are summarized.
      Although, in Japanese sentence structure, adjectives and nouns can be used predicatively, they lack motional [active] expressions. So, mainly, their primary function is to indicate stativity.
      In the case of the predicate verb, [active] means a major feature, but the significant semantic function of the status property can not be overlooked.
      The predicate verb that includes stativity has state condition from the beginning or sometimes it has the condition, depending on the sentence structure.
      This paper specifies sentences that attains the stative meaning by [Properties] as well as by syntactic structure.
      [Changes steady state], but not invariant to perform the change, condition persists for type [adjective persistent state changes] will be. And finally, after a temporary change lasting Temporary changes in steady state can be mentioned.
      State of verb et al would then take on a strong “state property” and is located in the attributive predicate is closely related to the main noun, it should be considered as one group.
      Compared to the predicate is a predicate overdue order Status Name stands out was discussion about the limitations of predicate types. As a result, when indicates stativity, the “ru” shows its limit to some extent limit.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. はじめに
      • 2. 従来の状態性をめぐって
      • 3. 考察の展開方向
      • 4. 連体動詞における状態性の意味類型
      • 5. 連体動詞の状態性における述語形式の制限
      • 1. はじめに
      • 2. 従来の状態性をめぐって
      • 3. 考察の展開方向
      • 4. 連体動詞における状態性の意味類型
      • 5. 連体動詞の状態性における述語形式の制限
      • 6. まとめ
      • 参考文献
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 工藤真由美, "朝倉日本語講座6" 朝倉書店 172-, 2004

      2 高橋太郎, "日本語の文法" ひつじ書房  123-127, 2010

      3 仁田義雄, "命題の意味的類型についての覚え書き" 1 (1): 10-, 2001

      4 益岡隆志, "叙述類型論" くろしお出版 4-17, 2008

      5 真野美穂, "叙述類型論" くろしお出版 67-91, 2008

      6 影山太郎, "叙述類型論" くろしお出版 21-41, 2008

      7 森田良行, "動詞・形容詞・副詞の事典" 東京堂出版 102-199, 2008

      1 工藤真由美, "朝倉日本語講座6" 朝倉書店 172-, 2004

      2 高橋太郎, "日本語の文法" ひつじ書房  123-127, 2010

      3 仁田義雄, "命題の意味的類型についての覚え書き" 1 (1): 10-, 2001

      4 益岡隆志, "叙述類型論" くろしお出版 4-17, 2008

      5 真野美穂, "叙述類型論" くろしお出版 67-91, 2008

      6 影山太郎, "叙述類型論" くろしお出版 21-41, 2008

      7 森田良行, "動詞・形容詞・副詞の事典" 東京堂出版 102-199, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-06-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> 日本硏究 KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.41 0.41 0.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.31 0.28 0.746 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼