RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국 · 일본 전통 상류주택의 비물질적 표현특성 비교 = The Immateriality at the Korean and Japanese Traditional Upper-Class House

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101086612

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      To the extent of this study, focused on the aspects of material, form, and space, traditional upper-class house in Korea and Japan will be analyzed; the characteristics of nonmaterial expression are concluded as follows.
      1. The similar appearances were presented in Korean’ and Japanese’ house in the intervals between rooms in aspects of material and space. In the material aspect, the expressions of breaking boundary was detected in both architect styles, using Han-ji and Wa-si, which share features of transparency. At the open of windows and doors, both houses represent such characteristics in the intervals, being embodied of visual communication with spaces directly. However, at the close of windows and doors, the spatial decomposition is observed in Korean house whereas the condition is hardly built in Japanese house, applying thick Husuma.
      Meanwhile, there are distinct differences of Korea and Japan found in formal aspect, in between interior and exterior area, and in between exterior and another exterior area. To sum up these discriminative conditions; Korea has non-material expression developed depicting models from nature as they exist or using the method that allows one to accept the nature as it is. On the contrary, Japan has its characteristic based on the contrast of figuration, cut-off in outside the nature, or placement of fabricated nature beside the area. In this perspective, Koreans’ expressions are observed to have a raw feature, however, Japanese’ are appeared to conceive the traits built upon artificial modification. Fundamentally, Korean built the house after constructing a village based on the relationship between surrounding environment, contrary to Japan from whose style is not deduced such architectural psychology based on a relationship among the nature and the village as Korea.
      2. In the ideological background, Wuwei Ziran?letting nature be, leaving the nature as it is? exists in Korea and Mu-zou-kan?a view of life as something transient and empty?in Japan, and Korean spaces naturally represent characteristics of circular and mutual?non-selfish?space constituted on the link of overall relationship beyond boundaries. Consequently, Japanese space differentiates its traits of independent, non-circular, and own selfish space from Korea.
      It is very important and necessary to establish for the Korean traditional House’s excellency with multidirectional objectification of Korean traditional space’s characteristics. And this paper presents the findings obtained from the investigation of immaterial peculiarities retained in the Japanese traditional House of upper class, on the base of the preceding research -residence of the gentility in the Korean Joseon Dynasty.
      번역하기

      To the extent of this study, focused on the aspects of material, form, and space, traditional upper-class house in Korea and Japan will be analyzed; the characteristics of nonmaterial expression are concluded as follows. 1. The similar appearances ...

      To the extent of this study, focused on the aspects of material, form, and space, traditional upper-class house in Korea and Japan will be analyzed; the characteristics of nonmaterial expression are concluded as follows.
      1. The similar appearances were presented in Korean’ and Japanese’ house in the intervals between rooms in aspects of material and space. In the material aspect, the expressions of breaking boundary was detected in both architect styles, using Han-ji and Wa-si, which share features of transparency. At the open of windows and doors, both houses represent such characteristics in the intervals, being embodied of visual communication with spaces directly. However, at the close of windows and doors, the spatial decomposition is observed in Korean house whereas the condition is hardly built in Japanese house, applying thick Husuma.
      Meanwhile, there are distinct differences of Korea and Japan found in formal aspect, in between interior and exterior area, and in between exterior and another exterior area. To sum up these discriminative conditions; Korea has non-material expression developed depicting models from nature as they exist or using the method that allows one to accept the nature as it is. On the contrary, Japan has its characteristic based on the contrast of figuration, cut-off in outside the nature, or placement of fabricated nature beside the area. In this perspective, Koreans’ expressions are observed to have a raw feature, however, Japanese’ are appeared to conceive the traits built upon artificial modification. Fundamentally, Korean built the house after constructing a village based on the relationship between surrounding environment, contrary to Japan from whose style is not deduced such architectural psychology based on a relationship among the nature and the village as Korea.
      2. In the ideological background, Wuwei Ziran?letting nature be, leaving the nature as it is? exists in Korea and Mu-zou-kan?a view of life as something transient and empty?in Japan, and Korean spaces naturally represent characteristics of circular and mutual?non-selfish?space constituted on the link of overall relationship beyond boundaries. Consequently, Japanese space differentiates its traits of independent, non-circular, and own selfish space from Korea.
      It is very important and necessary to establish for the Korean traditional House’s excellency with multidirectional objectification of Korean traditional space’s characteristics. And this paper presents the findings obtained from the investigation of immaterial peculiarities retained in the Japanese traditional House of upper class, on the base of the preceding research -residence of the gentility in the Korean Joseon Dynasty.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 한국 · 일본 전통 상류주택 공간특성
      • Ⅲ. 비물질적 표현 특성
      • Ⅳ. 분석
      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 한국 · 일본 전통 상류주택 공간특성
      • Ⅲ. 비물질적 표현 특성
      • Ⅳ. 분석
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼