RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      소수언어와 언어권리 = Linguistic Minorities and Linguistic Rights

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101590970

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      An important claim of this paper is that there are no absolute criteria of language policy and planning, because of the complexities of the issues which involve the sociology of language. In particular, the issues involving the position or status of Jeju dialect have the similar complexities which need to be resolved in the fields of academic and social domains.
      In general, minority language groups adopt one of several policy options in respect of the status of their languages or dialects. One aspect of language planning is to declare their language or dialect as a national/official language, establishing linguistic rights. Another choice is to maintain their language or dialect by actively using and promoting it in a de facto diglossic situation, in which members of minority languages maintain their languages across generations, thus facing no threat of language loss. In this case, viable speech communities continue to be maintained, keeping the language loss postponed. The third option is to allow their language or dialect to proceed to linguistic continuum, in which members of minority languages lose their language after several generations, ultimately resulting in language loss. In this case, the influence of standard languages of majority groups entail the marginalization (or endangerment) and eventual loss of minority languages or dialects.
      The three different choices mentioned above can also be applied to the discussion of the position or status of Jeju dialect. Giving examples of language situations relevant to such three cases across the world, this paper provides some sociolinguistic implications to be responsible for dealing with the position of Jeju dialect, addressing some issues of acquisition or literacy planning that fall within linguistic rights or revitalization in general.
      번역하기

      An important claim of this paper is that there are no absolute criteria of language policy and planning, because of the complexities of the issues which involve the sociology of language. In particular, the issues involving the position or status of J...

      An important claim of this paper is that there are no absolute criteria of language policy and planning, because of the complexities of the issues which involve the sociology of language. In particular, the issues involving the position or status of Jeju dialect have the similar complexities which need to be resolved in the fields of academic and social domains.
      In general, minority language groups adopt one of several policy options in respect of the status of their languages or dialects. One aspect of language planning is to declare their language or dialect as a national/official language, establishing linguistic rights. Another choice is to maintain their language or dialect by actively using and promoting it in a de facto diglossic situation, in which members of minority languages maintain their languages across generations, thus facing no threat of language loss. In this case, viable speech communities continue to be maintained, keeping the language loss postponed. The third option is to allow their language or dialect to proceed to linguistic continuum, in which members of minority languages lose their language after several generations, ultimately resulting in language loss. In this case, the influence of standard languages of majority groups entail the marginalization (or endangerment) and eventual loss of minority languages or dialects.
      The three different choices mentioned above can also be applied to the discussion of the position or status of Jeju dialect. Giving examples of language situations relevant to such three cases across the world, this paper provides some sociolinguistic implications to be responsible for dealing with the position of Jeju dialect, addressing some issues of acquisition or literacy planning that fall within linguistic rights or revitalization in general.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조주연, "흑인영어 논쟁" 5 (5): 361-399, 1997

      2 고동호, "제줏말의 가치와 부흥"

      3 문순덕, "제주방언 연구의 어제와 오늘" 제주발전연구원 347-375, 2014

      4 고동호, "제주방언 연구의 어제와 오늘" 제주발전연구원 1-28, 2014

      5 문순덕, "제주방언 문법 연구" 도서출판 세림 2003

      6 강윤희, "제주 사회에서의 두 방언 사용 현상" 서울대학교 1993

      7 변명섭, "언어정책과 언어법제화의 양상" 제주대학교 사회발전연구소 9 : 203-230, 2003

      8 변명섭, "언어변이의 사회언어학적 의미" 9 (9): 1-21, 2004

      9 변명섭, "언어변이와 언어정책" 미래영어영문학회 19 (19): 207-234, 2014

      10 강정희, "소멸위기의 제주방언 보전을 위한 방언 활성화 방안" 영주어문학회 23 : 185-205, 2012

      1 조주연, "흑인영어 논쟁" 5 (5): 361-399, 1997

      2 고동호, "제줏말의 가치와 부흥"

      3 문순덕, "제주방언 연구의 어제와 오늘" 제주발전연구원 347-375, 2014

      4 고동호, "제주방언 연구의 어제와 오늘" 제주발전연구원 1-28, 2014

      5 문순덕, "제주방언 문법 연구" 도서출판 세림 2003

      6 강윤희, "제주 사회에서의 두 방언 사용 현상" 서울대학교 1993

      7 변명섭, "언어정책과 언어법제화의 양상" 제주대학교 사회발전연구소 9 : 203-230, 2003

      8 변명섭, "언어변이의 사회언어학적 의미" 9 (9): 1-21, 2004

      9 변명섭, "언어변이와 언어정책" 미래영어영문학회 19 (19): 207-234, 2014

      10 강정희, "소멸위기의 제주방언 보전을 위한 방언 활성화 방안" 영주어문학회 23 : 185-205, 2012

      11 Fasold, Ralph, "The Sociolinguistics of Society" Basil Blackwell 1984

      12 Daoust, D, "The Handbook of Sociolinguistics" Basil Blackwell 1997

      13 Bell, R. T, "Sociolinguistics: Goals, Approaches and Problems" Batsford 1976

      14 Bickerton, Derek, "Roots of Language" Karoma Publishers 1981

      15 Cobarrubias, J, "Progress in Language Planning: International Perspectives" Mouton 1983

      16 Rickford, J. R, "Pidgin and Creole Linguistics" Indiana University Press 1977

      17 Labov, William, "Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: The case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor" 11 : 165-201, 1982

      18 Phillipson, Robert, "Linguistic Imperialism" Oxford University Press 1992

      19 García, Ofelia, "Languages for a Multicultural World in Transition" National Textbook Company 1992

      20 May, S, "Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism and the Politics of Language" Routledge 2011

      21 Cooper, R. L, "Language Planning and Social Changes" Cambridge University Press 1989

      22 Holmes, Janet, "Keeping Languages Alive: Documentation, Pedagogy, and Revitalization" Cambridge University Press 2001

      23 Mesthrie, Rajend, "Introducing Sociolinguistics" Edinburgh University Press 2009

      24 Lewis, M. Paul, "Ethnologue: Languages of the World" SIL International

      25 Deuber, Dagmar, "English in the Carribean: Variation, Style and Standards in Jamaica and Trinidad" Cambridge University Press 2014

      26 Crystal, David, "English as a Global Language" Cambridge University Press 2003

      27 Ferguson, C. A, "Diglossia" 15 : 325-340, 1959

      28 Dillard, J. L, "Black English: Its History and Usage in the United States" Random House 1972

      29 Moseley, C, "Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger" UNESCO Publishing 2010

      30 Wardhaugh, Ronald, "An Introduction to Sociolinguistics" Blackwell 2002

      31 Ricento, Thomas, "An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method" Blackwell 2006

      32 May, S, "An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method" Blackwell 2006

      33 McDavid, R. I, "Americn social dialects" 26 : 254-260, 1965

      34 Mufwene, Salikoko S, "Africanisms in Afro-American Language Varieties" The University of Georgia Press 1993

      35 Green. Lisa J, "African American English: A Linguistic Introduction" Cambridge University Press 2002

      36 Kurath, H, "A Word Geography of the Eastern United States" University of Michigan Press 1949

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-09-19 학회명변경 영문명 : The Mirae English Language and Literature Society -> The Mirae English Language and Literature Association KCI등재
      2016-09-13 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of Mirae English Language and Literature -> The Mirae Journal of English Language and Literature KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.17 0.17 0.16
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.16 0.16 0.323 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼