RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Formation and Development of the Korean Administrative Procedure Act: From the Perspective of Legal Transfer

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Twenty-six years after the enactment of the Korean Administrative Procedure Act in 1996, the Act has been substantially revised. In the course of enacting and amending the Act, a series of legal transfers were made. A comprehensive analysis of these transfers provides invaluable insights into the transfer of legislation. It is crucial to differentiate between the impact of foreign legislation on the 1996 enactment and its influence on the 2022 revision, as these are two distinct phenomena. The process preceding the enactment of the Administrative Procedure Act in 1996 involved the transfer of legal systems from Germany, the United States, and Japan. Nevertheless, the selection of a foreign legal system and legal theory was ultimately contingent upon the requirements of the legislative leadership group. A variety of stakeholders, including academics, civil society organisations and bureaucratic groups, held disparate views on the optimal foreign legal system and legal theory to adopt in the development of the Administrative Procedure Act. This is because the perception of the problem by each group ultimately determined which countryʼs legal system and legal theory should be adopted. Ultimately, the opinions of the bureaucratic groups with the most at stake were the ones that prevailed in the legislative process. However, the 2022 revision marked a significant shift from the approach taken in 1996, with Korean case law assuming a more prominent role in the development of the law. In the 2022 legal transfer, foreign legal systems and legal theories played a more nominal role in justifying the legislation. Meanwhile, the actual content of thelegislation reflected the intentions of the legislative leadership group and the development of case law in accordance with Koreaʼs own driving forces. Nevertheless, foreign legal systems and theories will continue to serve as a pivotal point of reference for Korean legislation, as well as a crucial foundation for the legitimisation of the legislation.
      번역하기

      Twenty-six years after the enactment of the Korean Administrative Procedure Act in 1996, the Act has been substantially revised. In the course of enacting and amending the Act, a series of legal transfers were made. A comprehensive analysis of these t...

      Twenty-six years after the enactment of the Korean Administrative Procedure Act in 1996, the Act has been substantially revised. In the course of enacting and amending the Act, a series of legal transfers were made. A comprehensive analysis of these transfers provides invaluable insights into the transfer of legislation. It is crucial to differentiate between the impact of foreign legislation on the 1996 enactment and its influence on the 2022 revision, as these are two distinct phenomena. The process preceding the enactment of the Administrative Procedure Act in 1996 involved the transfer of legal systems from Germany, the United States, and Japan. Nevertheless, the selection of a foreign legal system and legal theory was ultimately contingent upon the requirements of the legislative leadership group. A variety of stakeholders, including academics, civil society organisations and bureaucratic groups, held disparate views on the optimal foreign legal system and legal theory to adopt in the development of the Administrative Procedure Act. This is because the perception of the problem by each group ultimately determined which countryʼs legal system and legal theory should be adopted. Ultimately, the opinions of the bureaucratic groups with the most at stake were the ones that prevailed in the legislative process. However, the 2022 revision marked a significant shift from the approach taken in 1996, with Korean case law assuming a more prominent role in the development of the law. In the 2022 legal transfer, foreign legal systems and legal theories played a more nominal role in justifying the legislation. Meanwhile, the actual content of thelegislation reflected the intentions of the legislative leadership group and the development of case law in accordance with Koreaʼs own driving forces. Nevertheless, foreign legal systems and theories will continue to serve as a pivotal point of reference for Korean legislation, as well as a crucial foundation for the legitimisation of the legislation.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼