RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      A comparison of the temperature difference according to the placement of a nasopharyngeal temperature probe

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103552763

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: The purpose of this study was to compare temperatures measured at three different sites where a nasopharyngeal temperature probe is commonly placed.
      Methods: Eighty elective abdominal surgical patients were enrolled. After anesthesia induction, four temperature probes were placed at the nasal cavity, upper portion of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and the esophagus. The placement of the nasopharyngeal temperature probes was evaluated using a flexible nasendoscope, and the depth from the nares was measured.
      The four temperatures were simultaneously recorded at 10-minute intervals for 60 minutes.
      Results: The average depths of the probes that were placed in the nasal cavity, upper nasopharynx, and the oropharynx were respectively 5.7 ± 0.9 cm, 9.9 ± 0.7 cm, and 13.6 ± 1.7 cm from the nares. In the baseline temperatures, the temperature differences were significantly greater in the nasal cavity 0.32 (95% CI; 0.27–0.37)oC than in the nasopharynx 0.02 (0.01–0.04)oC, and oropharynx 0.02 (−0.01 to 0.05)oC compared with the esophagus (P < 0.001). These differences were maintained for 60 minutes. Twenty patients showed a 0.5oC or greater temperature difference between the nasal cavity and the esophagus, but no patient showed such a difference at the nasopharynx and oropharynx.
      Conclusions: During general anesthesia, the temperatures measured at the upper nasopharynx and the oropharynx, but not the nasal cavity, reflected the core temperature. Therefore, the authors recommend that a probe should be placed at the nasopharynx (≈ 10 cm) or oropharynx (≈ 14 cm) with mucosal attachment for accurate core temperature measurement.
      번역하기

      Background: The purpose of this study was to compare temperatures measured at three different sites where a nasopharyngeal temperature probe is commonly placed. Methods: Eighty elective abdominal surgical patients were enrolled. After anesthesia indu...

      Background: The purpose of this study was to compare temperatures measured at three different sites where a nasopharyngeal temperature probe is commonly placed.
      Methods: Eighty elective abdominal surgical patients were enrolled. After anesthesia induction, four temperature probes were placed at the nasal cavity, upper portion of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and the esophagus. The placement of the nasopharyngeal temperature probes was evaluated using a flexible nasendoscope, and the depth from the nares was measured.
      The four temperatures were simultaneously recorded at 10-minute intervals for 60 minutes.
      Results: The average depths of the probes that were placed in the nasal cavity, upper nasopharynx, and the oropharynx were respectively 5.7 ± 0.9 cm, 9.9 ± 0.7 cm, and 13.6 ± 1.7 cm from the nares. In the baseline temperatures, the temperature differences were significantly greater in the nasal cavity 0.32 (95% CI; 0.27–0.37)oC than in the nasopharynx 0.02 (0.01–0.04)oC, and oropharynx 0.02 (−0.01 to 0.05)oC compared with the esophagus (P < 0.001). These differences were maintained for 60 minutes. Twenty patients showed a 0.5oC or greater temperature difference between the nasal cavity and the esophagus, but no patient showed such a difference at the nasopharynx and oropharynx.
      Conclusions: During general anesthesia, the temperatures measured at the upper nasopharynx and the oropharynx, but not the nasal cavity, reflected the core temperature. Therefore, the authors recommend that a probe should be placed at the nasopharynx (≈ 10 cm) or oropharynx (≈ 14 cm) with mucosal attachment for accurate core temperature measurement.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Frank SM, "Unintentional hypothermia is associated with postoperative myocardial ischemia" 78 : 468-476, 1993

      2 Støen R, "The thermoregulatory threshold is inversely proportional to isoflurane concentration" 72 : 822-827, 1990

      3 Reed RL, "The disparity between hypothermic coagulopathy and clotting studies" 33 : 465-470, 1992

      4 Torossian A, "Survey on intraoperative temperature management in Europe" 24 : 668-675, 2007

      5 Atarashi K, "Sevoflurane comparably decreases the threshold for thermoregulatory vasoconstriction as isoflurane" 45 : 818-823, 1996

      6 Birks RJ, "Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery"

      7 Kurz A, "Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization" 334 : 1209-1215, 1996

      8 Frank SM, "Perioperative maintenance of normothermia reduces the incidence of morbid cardiac events. A randomized clinical trial" 277 : 1127-1134, 1997

      9 Lee J, "Optimal nasopharyngeal temperature probe placement" 119 : 875-879, 2014

      10 Sessler DI, "Mild perioperative hypothermia" 336 : 1730-1737, 1997

      1 Frank SM, "Unintentional hypothermia is associated with postoperative myocardial ischemia" 78 : 468-476, 1993

      2 Støen R, "The thermoregulatory threshold is inversely proportional to isoflurane concentration" 72 : 822-827, 1990

      3 Reed RL, "The disparity between hypothermic coagulopathy and clotting studies" 33 : 465-470, 1992

      4 Torossian A, "Survey on intraoperative temperature management in Europe" 24 : 668-675, 2007

      5 Atarashi K, "Sevoflurane comparably decreases the threshold for thermoregulatory vasoconstriction as isoflurane" 45 : 818-823, 1996

      6 Birks RJ, "Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery"

      7 Kurz A, "Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization" 334 : 1209-1215, 1996

      8 Frank SM, "Perioperative maintenance of normothermia reduces the incidence of morbid cardiac events. A randomized clinical trial" 277 : 1127-1134, 1997

      9 Lee J, "Optimal nasopharyngeal temperature probe placement" 119 : 875-879, 2014

      10 Sessler DI, "Mild perioperative hypothermia" 336 : 1730-1737, 1997

      11 Schmied H, "Mild hypothermia increases blood loss and transfusion requirements during total hip arthroplasty" 347 : 289-292, 1996

      12 Matsukawa T, "Heat flow and distribution during induction of general anesthesia" 82 : 662-673, 1995

      13 Stone JG, "Do standard monitoring sites reflect true brain temperature when profound hypothermia is rapidly induced and reversed?" 82 : 344-351, 1995

      14 Akata T, "Comparison of volatile anesthetic actions on intracellular calcium stores of vascular smooth muscle: investigation in isolated systemic resistance arteries" 94 : 840-850, 2001

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼