RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국과 일본의 독서정책 분석 = An Analysis of the Reading Policies of Korea and Japan

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100177837

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    National reading policies of Korea and Japan were analysed by scrutinizing some laws and national and/or regional plans to promote reading culture of each country. Which would lead to suggest some strategies for sustainable and systematic reading policies. ‘Library and Reading Promotion Act’ of 1994, the first ever Korean law that declared that promoting reading culture is one of its aims, was succeeded by ‘Reading Culture Promotion Act’ of 2007. The Act which regulates matters to guarantee every peoples’ lifetime reading proclaims national and local governments’ duty to promote reading culture. It also systemizes the reading policy process. However, experts’ exclusion in that process is a drawback of it. Korean government has issued two versions of reading culture promotion master plan. Both of them covers very broad areas of policies, but reveals limited understanding about reading culture. They don’t give any specific road map and plans to get financial resources and manpower. In Japan, one can recognize many kinds of reading culture promotion policies like ‘Act on the Promotion of Children’s Reading’ of 2001 and ‘Text and Printing Culture Promotion Act’ of 2005. Central government devises a long-term plan to develop literacy of children and young adults every five years; local governments devises an acting plan every year. The focal point of the reading policies in Japan is changing from reading itself to literacy. They are concerned about the feasibility of policies through collaboration and involvement of every interest groups, systematic linking of long-term plan and acting plans.Here are some strategic suggestions to get sustainable and systematic reading policies: reading governance to realize involvement and collaboration policy model; professional human resources and stable financial resources to guarantee some level of outcomes in reading culture; levelling the quality of information up to have efficient plan; development of digital literacy to cope with the rapidly changing ICT.
    번역하기

    National reading policies of Korea and Japan were analysed by scrutinizing some laws and national and/or regional plans to promote reading culture of each country. Which would lead to suggest some strategies for sustainable and systematic reading poli...

    National reading policies of Korea and Japan were analysed by scrutinizing some laws and national and/or regional plans to promote reading culture of each country. Which would lead to suggest some strategies for sustainable and systematic reading policies. ‘Library and Reading Promotion Act’ of 1994, the first ever Korean law that declared that promoting reading culture is one of its aims, was succeeded by ‘Reading Culture Promotion Act’ of 2007. The Act which regulates matters to guarantee every peoples’ lifetime reading proclaims national and local governments’ duty to promote reading culture. It also systemizes the reading policy process. However, experts’ exclusion in that process is a drawback of it. Korean government has issued two versions of reading culture promotion master plan. Both of them covers very broad areas of policies, but reveals limited understanding about reading culture. They don’t give any specific road map and plans to get financial resources and manpower. In Japan, one can recognize many kinds of reading culture promotion policies like ‘Act on the Promotion of Children’s Reading’ of 2001 and ‘Text and Printing Culture Promotion Act’ of 2005. Central government devises a long-term plan to develop literacy of children and young adults every five years; local governments devises an acting plan every year. The focal point of the reading policies in Japan is changing from reading itself to literacy. They are concerned about the feasibility of policies through collaboration and involvement of every interest groups, systematic linking of long-term plan and acting plans.Here are some strategic suggestions to get sustainable and systematic reading policies: reading governance to realize involvement and collaboration policy model; professional human resources and stable financial resources to guarantee some level of outcomes in reading culture; levelling the quality of information up to have efficient plan; development of digital literacy to cope with the rapidly changing ICT.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 사공영호, "정책:존재론적 해명" 한국행정연구소 51 (51): 61-93, 2013

    2 안찬수, "정부・지방자치단체의 독서정책 현황과 발전 방향" 한국도서관협회 53 (53): 2012

    3 황금숙, "어린이·청소년 독서문화 진흥 선진화 방안 연구" 한국문헌정보학회 45 (45): 277-308, 2011

    4 이인제, "소통, 화합, 문화 융성의 핵심 역량으로서 독서 능력 향상 정책의 방향" 청람어문교육학회 (48) : 225-288, 2013

    5 최인자, "문화 정책으로서의 독서 정책 방향" 한국독서학회 (30) : 261-286, 2013

    6 김상욱, "독서운동의 현황과 방향" 한국독서학회 (27) : 42-63, 2012

    7 안찬수, "독서문화진흥법과 독서문화 진흥의 방향" 창비어린이 5 (5): 2007

    8 문화체육관광부, "독서문화진흥기본계획 (2014~2018)" 2013

    9 문화체육관광부, "독서문화진흥기본계획" 2008

    10 박인기, "독서 현상 연구와 독서 정책의 방향" 한국독서학회 (17) : 9-35, 2007

    1 사공영호, "정책:존재론적 해명" 한국행정연구소 51 (51): 61-93, 2013

    2 안찬수, "정부・지방자치단체의 독서정책 현황과 발전 방향" 한국도서관협회 53 (53): 2012

    3 황금숙, "어린이·청소년 독서문화 진흥 선진화 방안 연구" 한국문헌정보학회 45 (45): 277-308, 2011

    4 이인제, "소통, 화합, 문화 융성의 핵심 역량으로서 독서 능력 향상 정책의 방향" 청람어문교육학회 (48) : 225-288, 2013

    5 최인자, "문화 정책으로서의 독서 정책 방향" 한국독서학회 (30) : 261-286, 2013

    6 김상욱, "독서운동의 현황과 방향" 한국독서학회 (27) : 42-63, 2012

    7 안찬수, "독서문화진흥법과 독서문화 진흥의 방향" 창비어린이 5 (5): 2007

    8 문화체육관광부, "독서문화진흥기본계획 (2014~2018)" 2013

    9 문화체육관광부, "독서문화진흥기본계획" 2008

    10 박인기, "독서 현상 연구와 독서 정책의 방향" 한국독서학회 (17) : 9-35, 2007

    11 박인기, "독서 진흥을 위한 환경과 독서정책" 한국독서학회 (16) : 333-356, 2006

    12 김수경, "도서관과 독서진흥활동" 한국도서관협회 53 (53): 2012

    13 米谷優子, "讀書推進政策の傾向と課題" 6 (6): 2009

    14 岩崎れい, "子どもの讀書活動推進の傾向と課題" 46 (46): 2008

    15 篠原由美子, "子どもの讀書をめぐる法と政策" 60 (60): 2009

    16 文部科學, "子どもの読書活動の推進に関する基本的な計画(第二次)"

    17 文部科學, "子どもの読書活動の推進に関する基本的な計画(第三次)"

    18 文部科學, "子どもの読書活動の推進に関する基本的な計画(第一次)"

    19 Zickuhr, Kathryn, "Younger Americans’ Reading and Library Habits" Pew Research Center 2012

    20 National Endowment for the Arts, "To Read or Not To Read: a Question of National Consequence" NEA 2007

    21 Hanushek, Eric A., "The Cost of Low Educational Achievement in the European Union" European Commission Education and Culture 2010

    22 National Endowment for the Arts, "Reading on the Rise: a New Chapter in American Literacy" NEA 2009

    23 National Endowment for the Arts, "Reading at Risk: a Survey of Literary Reading in America" NEA 2004

    24 Ross, Catherine Sheldrick, "Reading Matters: What the Research Reveals About Reading, Libraries, and Community" Libraries Unlimited 2006

    25 Doiron, Ray, "Promoting a Culture for Reading in a Diverse World" 37 (37): 2011

    26 European Commission, "EU High Level Group of Experts on Literacy" Publications Office of the European Union 2012

    27 문화체육관광부, "2013년 독서진흥에 관한 연차보고서" 2013

    28 문화체육관광부, "2013년 국민 독서실태 조사" 2013

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.99 0.99 1.11
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.18 1.18 1.509 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼