RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    독서정책의 방향과 과제 -독서의 사회,문화적 작용과 정책화 = Direction and Task of Reading Policy Sociocultural effect of reading and It`s employing policy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100177834

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Reading is the base of the society to develop its knowledge and culture, so it is natural to take reading promotion as a national policy. The reading policy starts from finding a problem of reading phenomenon to improve such. It is necessary to have efforts to have attention to how reading is effecting in socioculture during the process of planning, implementing and evaluating reading policy. The reading policy has a weakness that cannot be clearly stands out as a policy compare to other policies of economy, welfare, and health. The frame to promote the policy is not strong enough, and the density of contents that constructs the policy is weak, too. For the reading policy, a national reading promotion policy that has a consistent policy target and policy measures is the representative one. However, in case of Korea, this policy only emphasizes the cause, but had weak realistic measures. Generally reading is playing a role as a means of policy of the other certain policy target, but in the future, this function of reading should gain attention. This is because the function and effect of reading as a means of policies of education, culture, and welfare, will gradually increase. To establish more effective reading policy, the study of how reading could socially and culturally have effect on and such usage should be strengthened. Moreover, the organic relationship between reading and other policies should be analyzed to allow the reading policy to have superior reciprocity compare to others. Also, discernment on rapidly changing reader environments and its policy reflection are required. In general national curriculum, the importance of reading should be clarified, each area of public culture, especially the value of reading in the future entertainment leisure society, needs to be harmonically developed, and preparation of future-oriented reading policy for readers who live in the multi literacy environment is necessary. Furthermore, creating the reading culture that allows the modern public to accept a classical reading in the modernized environment is another task of the reading policy.
    번역하기

    Reading is the base of the society to develop its knowledge and culture, so it is natural to take reading promotion as a national policy. The reading policy starts from finding a problem of reading phenomenon to improve such. It is necessary to have e...

    Reading is the base of the society to develop its knowledge and culture, so it is natural to take reading promotion as a national policy. The reading policy starts from finding a problem of reading phenomenon to improve such. It is necessary to have efforts to have attention to how reading is effecting in socioculture during the process of planning, implementing and evaluating reading policy. The reading policy has a weakness that cannot be clearly stands out as a policy compare to other policies of economy, welfare, and health. The frame to promote the policy is not strong enough, and the density of contents that constructs the policy is weak, too. For the reading policy, a national reading promotion policy that has a consistent policy target and policy measures is the representative one. However, in case of Korea, this policy only emphasizes the cause, but had weak realistic measures. Generally reading is playing a role as a means of policy of the other certain policy target, but in the future, this function of reading should gain attention. This is because the function and effect of reading as a means of policies of education, culture, and welfare, will gradually increase. To establish more effective reading policy, the study of how reading could socially and culturally have effect on and such usage should be strengthened. Moreover, the organic relationship between reading and other policies should be analyzed to allow the reading policy to have superior reciprocity compare to others. Also, discernment on rapidly changing reader environments and its policy reflection are required. In general national curriculum, the importance of reading should be clarified, each area of public culture, especially the value of reading in the future entertainment leisure society, needs to be harmonically developed, and preparation of future-oriented reading policy for readers who live in the multi literacy environment is necessary. Furthermore, creating the reading culture that allows the modern public to accept a classical reading in the modernized environment is another task of the reading policy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 안해균, "정책학원론" 다산출판사 1984

    2 김윤주, "복지정책으로서의 독서정책 -책 읽는 군포의 독서정책과 발전 방향-" 독서르네상스운동 2013

    3 최인자, "문화정책으로서의 독서정책" 독서르네상스운동 2013

    4 Smith, Philip, "문화이론" 이학사 2001

    5 윤재웅, "문학관과 디지털 스토리텔링" 2009

    6 백원근, "디지털시대의 독서환경 조성과 출판의 역할" 26-, 2006

    7 만프레드 슈피처, "디지털 치매" 북로드 2012

    8 박인기, "독서사회를 위한 지역사회 도서관의 역할" 2009

    9 박인기, "독서 환경의 변화와 고전" 한국독서학회 (19) : 9-38, 2008

    10 박인기, "독서 현상 연구와 독서 정책의 방향" 한국독서학회 (17) : 9-35, 2007

    1 안해균, "정책학원론" 다산출판사 1984

    2 김윤주, "복지정책으로서의 독서정책 -책 읽는 군포의 독서정책과 발전 방향-" 독서르네상스운동 2013

    3 최인자, "문화정책으로서의 독서정책" 독서르네상스운동 2013

    4 Smith, Philip, "문화이론" 이학사 2001

    5 윤재웅, "문학관과 디지털 스토리텔링" 2009

    6 백원근, "디지털시대의 독서환경 조성과 출판의 역할" 26-, 2006

    7 만프레드 슈피처, "디지털 치매" 북로드 2012

    8 박인기, "독서사회를 위한 지역사회 도서관의 역할" 2009

    9 박인기, "독서 환경의 변화와 고전" 한국독서학회 (19) : 9-38, 2008

    10 박인기, "독서 현상 연구와 독서 정책의 방향" 한국독서학회 (17) : 9-35, 2007

    11 박인기, "독서 진흥을 위한 환경과 독서정책" 한국독서학회 (16) : 333-356, 2006

    12 박인기, "다매체 환경에서의 독서 행위와 독자의 진화" 국립중앙도서관 2012

    13 최희선, "교육정책의 탐구논리" 교육과학사 2006

    14 김명수, "교육정책으로서의 독서정책" 독서르네상스운동 2013

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.99 0.99 1.11
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.18 1.18 1.509 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼