RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      연방제도 정립과정 비교: 안정된 연방국가 7개국의 다층구조 거버넌스 구축을 중심으로 = Comparing the Establishment of Federalism as Multi-Level Governance in 7 Advanced Federal States

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103964972

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As ideology to promote associations among interdependent groups, federalism explores to institutionalize shared rule and self-rule in balance. In principle, federal institutions are designed to provide constituents with routes to resolve conflict, protect minorities and their rights from encroachment, furnish a forum to represent regional or territorial interests, and/or offer opportunities to experiment policy innovation on a subnational level. Yet democratic governance is not exclusively limited to federative arrangements; other systems of governance may actually excel. Furthermore, the fundamental tension lies in a natural tendency of federalism either to get excessively centralized or too decentralized, thus contradicting ideals pursued in democracy. Why federalism is often preferred to other types of governance, then, is not because of its inherent superiority but because of its potentials to prevent or undo such dysfunctions through meticulously devised mechanisms.
      Needless to say, each country and regime with its own specific historical, institutional and circumstantial factors encounters its everchanging political, economic and social landscapes over time, which requires a specific adjustment in its fiscal management, institutional rearrangement and even constitutional revision. Federalism provides not only solutions to these specific problems but also perspectives to problems of governance. Consequently, discreet outcomes of federalism are readily available across different countries and times, and even among different administrations/cabinets in the same country.
      Despite such individual idiosyncrasy, federalism can be defined as “a covenant to carry out what was compromised for the sake of creating a new locus among political constituents.” Accordingly all federative arrangements are commonly in pursuit of multi-level governance in which interstate, intrastate, and inter-community relations are arguably coordinated in the most effective and democratic manner.
      In this paper, I explore how 7 advanced federal states—Austria, Australia, Canada, Germany, United States, Belgium, and Switzerland—institutionalize these various forms of federative arrangements and put them into practice by emphasizing several key factors.
      This paper is also an attempt to establish typology regarding federalism as multi-level governance, thus contributing to the study of comparative federalism.
      번역하기

      As ideology to promote associations among interdependent groups, federalism explores to institutionalize shared rule and self-rule in balance. In principle, federal institutions are designed to provide constituents with routes to resolve conflict, pro...

      As ideology to promote associations among interdependent groups, federalism explores to institutionalize shared rule and self-rule in balance. In principle, federal institutions are designed to provide constituents with routes to resolve conflict, protect minorities and their rights from encroachment, furnish a forum to represent regional or territorial interests, and/or offer opportunities to experiment policy innovation on a subnational level. Yet democratic governance is not exclusively limited to federative arrangements; other systems of governance may actually excel. Furthermore, the fundamental tension lies in a natural tendency of federalism either to get excessively centralized or too decentralized, thus contradicting ideals pursued in democracy. Why federalism is often preferred to other types of governance, then, is not because of its inherent superiority but because of its potentials to prevent or undo such dysfunctions through meticulously devised mechanisms.
      Needless to say, each country and regime with its own specific historical, institutional and circumstantial factors encounters its everchanging political, economic and social landscapes over time, which requires a specific adjustment in its fiscal management, institutional rearrangement and even constitutional revision. Federalism provides not only solutions to these specific problems but also perspectives to problems of governance. Consequently, discreet outcomes of federalism are readily available across different countries and times, and even among different administrations/cabinets in the same country.
      Despite such individual idiosyncrasy, federalism can be defined as “a covenant to carry out what was compromised for the sake of creating a new locus among political constituents.” Accordingly all federative arrangements are commonly in pursuit of multi-level governance in which interstate, intrastate, and inter-community relations are arguably coordinated in the most effective and democratic manner.
      In this paper, I explore how 7 advanced federal states—Austria, Australia, Canada, Germany, United States, Belgium, and Switzerland—institutionalize these various forms of federative arrangements and put them into practice by emphasizing several key factors.
      This paper is also an attempt to establish typology regarding federalism as multi-level governance, thus contributing to the study of comparative federalism.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "프루동(P. - J. Proudhon)의 연방주의와 민주주의 이해" 41 (41): 2001

      2 "캐나다 연방주의 변천과 재정문제 조정 지" 11 (11): 2003

      3 "유럽통합과 독일연방주의의 미래" 30 (30): 1996

      4 "오스트리아, 호주, 캐나다, 독일의 연방주의 비교" 18 (18): 2002b

      5 "연방주의, 재정분산과 정당간 경쟁" 42 (42): 2002a

      6 "연방주의 비교연구" 44 (44): 2004

      7 "연방제를 통한 통합과 분권의 구현 캐나다의 경험을 중심으로" 24 (24): 2006a

      8 "연방적 사회구성과 민주적 리더쉽" 12 (12): 2002

      9 "미국의 연방주의 탄생과 유지의 비결" 29 : 2006b

      10 "미국과 캐나다의 연방제도 비교 연구 건국과정과 헌법을 중심으로" 44 (44): 2004

      1 "프루동(P. - J. Proudhon)의 연방주의와 민주주의 이해" 41 (41): 2001

      2 "캐나다 연방주의 변천과 재정문제 조정 지" 11 (11): 2003

      3 "유럽통합과 독일연방주의의 미래" 30 (30): 1996

      4 "오스트리아, 호주, 캐나다, 독일의 연방주의 비교" 18 (18): 2002b

      5 "연방주의, 재정분산과 정당간 경쟁" 42 (42): 2002a

      6 "연방주의 비교연구" 44 (44): 2004

      7 "연방제를 통한 통합과 분권의 구현 캐나다의 경험을 중심으로" 24 (24): 2006a

      8 "연방적 사회구성과 민주적 리더쉽" 12 (12): 2002

      9 "미국의 연방주의 탄생과 유지의 비결" 29 : 2006b

      10 "미국과 캐나다의 연방제도 비교 연구 건국과정과 헌법을 중심으로" 44 (44): 2004

      11 "독일 연방주의와 시사점" 7 (7): 1998

      12 "다층구조 거버넌스로서의 연방 체제" 37 (37): 2003

      13 "University of Alabama Press" 1987

      14 "Unions of States The Theory and Practice of Confederation" Leicester University Press 1981

      15 "Unfulfilled Union: Canadian Federalism and National Unity, 4th ed" Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press 2004

      16 "The Territorial Dimension of Politics" 1970

      17 "The State in Question Transformations of the Australian State" Sydney: Allen & Unwin 1996

      18 "The Principle of Homogeneity and Democracy in Austrian Federalism: The Constitutional Court’s Ruling on Direct Democracy in Vorarlberg" 33 (33): 45-57, 2003

      19 "The Power of Institutions: Political Architecture and Governance" Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2003

      20 "The Politics of Belgium: A Unique Federalism" London: Hurst & Co 1996

      21 "The La¨nder and German Federalism" Manchester: Manchester University Press 2003

      22 "The Formation of the Australian State" Cambridge University Press 1788-1901, 1991

      23 "The Centenary Companion to Australian Federation" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999

      24 "Solving the Belgian Paradox: Political-Institutional Fragmentation, National Identity and Nationalist/Regionalist Politics" 29 : 210-226, 2002

      25 "Rethinking Australian Citizenship" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000

      26 "Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty" Princeton: Princeton University Press 2004

      27 "Regular States vs. Systems of States" New York: Palgrave 2005

      28 "Recasting German Federalism" London: Pinter 1999

      29 "Realities in Conflict" MacMillan Australia 1988

      30 "Politics as the Art of Associating" New York: Palgrave 2005

      31 "On the Relation which the States and General Government Bear to Each Other" New York: Palgrave 2005

      32 "Must what goes up comes down? Of pillars and arches in Austria’s political architecture" London: Routledge 1999

      33 "Interstate Relations: The Neglected Dimension of Federalism" Westport: Praeger 1996

      34 "Integration and Political Parties in Canada" Dundurn Press 1991

      35 "Institutions and Institutional Change in the Federal Republic of Germany" New York: St. Martin’s Press 2000

      36 "Institutional and Political Dimensions of Fiscal Federalism in the Multilevel Government, the U.S. Case" 25 (25): 2007

      37 "How Does Federalism Condition The Employment-Welfare Relationship?: Integrating Social Welfare Policy and Active Labor Market Policy into Youth Employment Policy in Canada" 13 (13): 73-94, 2006

      38 "History of Freedom and Other Essays" MacMillan & Co 1907

      39 "Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006

      40 "Governing from the Centre the Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics University of Toronto Press" 1990

      41 "Governance in Contemporary Germany: The Semisovereign State Revisited" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005

      42 "German Federalism in Comparative Perspective" London: Pinter 1999

      43 "Federalism and the Role of the State University of Toronto Press" 1987

      44 "Federalism Achieved the Belgian Elections of May 1995" 19 : 168-175, 1996

      45 "Falling from Grace: Nonestablished Brokerage Parties and the Weight of Predominance in Canadian Provinces and Australian States" 27 (27): 59-81, 1997

      46 "Experiments in the Commonwealth" Clarendon Press 1966

      47 "Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-Sustainable Federal Institutions" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004

      48 "Contemporary Austrian Politics" Boulder: Westview Press mar : 1996

      49 "Conflict and Compromise in Multilingual Societies" Wilfrid Laurier University Press 1986

      50 "Comparative Federalism: Theory and Practice" London: Routledge 2006

      51 "Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry" Petersborough: Broadview Press 2006

      52 "Coalition Government, Subnational Style: Multiparty Politics in Europe’s Regional Parliaments" Columbus: Ohio State University Press) 1998

      53 "Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy" Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002

      54 "Belgium: Hollowing the Center" Washington, D.C.: The Johns Hopkins University Press 2004

      55 "Austrian Euroscepticism: Democracy, Sovereignty and Welfare" Amsterdam: Rodopi 2005

      56 "Austria: The End of Proportional Government?" Oxford: Oxford University Press 2001

      57 "Austria 1945-1995: Fifty Years of the Second Republic" Brookfield: Ashgate 1998

      58 "Australian Constitutional Law and Theory" Sydney: Federation Press 1996

      59 "Approaches to the Study of Federalism" 15-33, 1966

      60 "A Journey through Time in Quest of a Meaning University of California Press" The Federal Principle 1978

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-07-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea and World Politics KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.92 0.92 0.91
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.88 0.95 1.328 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼