RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미국의 주택 양도소득세제와 시사점 = Capital Gains Tax in the United States and its Implications for Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101780913

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    1. CONTENTS
    (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
    The purpose of this study is to investigate the implications for capital gains tax on residence in Korea via consideration of capital gains tax in the United States on residence.
    (2) RESEARCH METHOD
    This study is conducted by field investigation and confirmation of practical contents after access to relevant webpages, as well as domestic and foreign literature review.
    (3) RESEARCH FINDINGS
    This study set out to investigate the implications for capital gains tax on residence in Korea. So I examined the capital gain tax on residence of the United States. As a result. the capital gain tax on residence of South Korea turned out to have some difference with that of the United States. The findings led to the following Results.
    2. RESULTS
    First, there were generally no differences in types & scope of residence as the subject of taxation. concept of transfer. and deduction of main residence in the United States when compared to those in Korea.
    Second, there were partial differences in calculation of capital gains as the concept of basis is used.
    Third, Korea applies non-taxation to residence under 0.9 billion won when two-year ownership requirements are satisfied. but the United States demands two-year ownership and two-year residence requirements and limits only amount of deductions without consideration of size and price of residence.
    Fourth, even in case of imposing capital gains tax. low-rate taxation is applied when compared to usual income.
    Fifth. the United States recently reduces tax favor such as exempting benefits of nonqualified usage to intensify taxation on capital gains.
    Finally, exemption of capital gains tax on obtaining residence recently published by the government may have problems from the aspect of the fairness in taxation. It is needed to examine low-rate taxation when compared to usual income like the United States or application of fixed amount of income tax deduction regardless of size and price of residence.
    번역하기

    1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to investigate the implications for capital gains tax on residence in Korea via consideration of capital gains tax in the United States on residence. (2) RESEARCH METHOD This study i...

    1. CONTENTS
    (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
    The purpose of this study is to investigate the implications for capital gains tax on residence in Korea via consideration of capital gains tax in the United States on residence.
    (2) RESEARCH METHOD
    This study is conducted by field investigation and confirmation of practical contents after access to relevant webpages, as well as domestic and foreign literature review.
    (3) RESEARCH FINDINGS
    This study set out to investigate the implications for capital gains tax on residence in Korea. So I examined the capital gain tax on residence of the United States. As a result. the capital gain tax on residence of South Korea turned out to have some difference with that of the United States. The findings led to the following Results.
    2. RESULTS
    First, there were generally no differences in types & scope of residence as the subject of taxation. concept of transfer. and deduction of main residence in the United States when compared to those in Korea.
    Second, there were partial differences in calculation of capital gains as the concept of basis is used.
    Third, Korea applies non-taxation to residence under 0.9 billion won when two-year ownership requirements are satisfied. but the United States demands two-year ownership and two-year residence requirements and limits only amount of deductions without consideration of size and price of residence.
    Fourth, even in case of imposing capital gains tax. low-rate taxation is applied when compared to usual income.
    Fifth. the United States recently reduces tax favor such as exempting benefits of nonqualified usage to intensify taxation on capital gains.
    Finally, exemption of capital gains tax on obtaining residence recently published by the government may have problems from the aspect of the fairness in taxation. It is needed to examine low-rate taxation when compared to usual income like the United States or application of fixed amount of income tax deduction regardless of size and price of residence.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 주택의 종류와 범위
    • Ⅲ. 양도의 범위
    • Ⅳ. 양도소득의 계산
    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 주택의 종류와 범위
    • Ⅲ. 양도의 범위
    • Ⅳ. 양도소득의 계산
    • Ⅴ. 비과세 및 감면
    • Ⅵ. 결론 및 시사점
    • 參考文獻
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이상신, "주택을 중심으로 한 현 정부의 부동산정책 평가와 차기 정부의 과제" 한국부동산학회 (51) : 252-264, 2012

    2 박훈, "주택에 대한 양도소득세 비과세 및 감면제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국세무학회 26 (26): 149-175, 2009

    3 박상혁, "주택양도소득세의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ­ -비과세․감면 및 중과세 제도를 중심으로 -­" 한국부동산학회 (48) : 195-214, 2012

    4 이태로, "조세법강의" 박영사 2011

    5 윤상필, "재개발․재건축사업의 개발이익 추정에 관한 연구" 한국부동산학회 (49) : 231-245, 2012

    6 김성희, "서울시 주택재개발사업의 조합원 기대이익 영향요인 분석" 한국부동산학회 (50) : 151-163, 2012

    7 이창석, "부동산범죄론" 형설출판사 2011

    8 이상신, "부동산 양도소득세제의 개편방향에 관한 연구" 한국부동산학회 (52) : 114-128, 2013

    9 최완호, "부동산 개발이익환수제도의 개선방안 - 전문가 의식조사를 중심으로 -" 한국부동산학회 (45) : 48-62, 2011

    10 "http://www.irs.gov/publications/p523/ar02.html#en_US_2012_publink1000200611"

    1 이상신, "주택을 중심으로 한 현 정부의 부동산정책 평가와 차기 정부의 과제" 한국부동산학회 (51) : 252-264, 2012

    2 박훈, "주택에 대한 양도소득세 비과세 및 감면제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국세무학회 26 (26): 149-175, 2009

    3 박상혁, "주택양도소득세의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ­ -비과세․감면 및 중과세 제도를 중심으로 -­" 한국부동산학회 (48) : 195-214, 2012

    4 이태로, "조세법강의" 박영사 2011

    5 윤상필, "재개발․재건축사업의 개발이익 추정에 관한 연구" 한국부동산학회 (49) : 231-245, 2012

    6 김성희, "서울시 주택재개발사업의 조합원 기대이익 영향요인 분석" 한국부동산학회 (50) : 151-163, 2012

    7 이창석, "부동산범죄론" 형설출판사 2011

    8 이상신, "부동산 양도소득세제의 개편방향에 관한 연구" 한국부동산학회 (52) : 114-128, 2013

    9 최완호, "부동산 개발이익환수제도의 개선방안 - 전문가 의식조사를 중심으로 -" 한국부동산학회 (45) : 48-62, 2011

    10 "http://www.irs.gov/publications/p523/ar02.html#en_US_2012_publink1000200611"

    11 Willis, "West Federal Taxation : Comprehensive Volume" Thomsom 2007

    12 Hoffman, "Individual Income Taxes" Cengage Learning 2010

    13 Peter W. Bernstein, "Ernst&Young Tax Guide 2013" John Wiley&sons 2013

    14 Murphy&Higgins, "Concepts in Federal Taxation" Thomson 2006

    15 Barbara Weltman, "1001 Deductions & Tax Breaks 2013" Wiley&sons 2013

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.61 2.61 1.87
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.49 1.25 0.704 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼