Modern project finance("PF") has been invented in U.S., Tracing back to when independent oil companies particularly in Texas tried to find and extract oil, financial institution had betted that the resource, the oil was actually present and that it co...
Modern project finance("PF") has been invented in U.S., Tracing back to when independent oil companies particularly in Texas tried to find and extract oil, financial institution had betted that the resource, the oil was actually present and that it could be sold at a price that lived up to initial expectation, and provided funds relying only for cash flow generated by the resource. In the mechanism of PF, the sponsoring firms create legally distinct economic entities, so-called project company("PC"), to develop, manage, and finance the project. PC borrows on a limited or non-recourse basis from the bank on the condition that the banks are relying on the project's cash flows rather than on the assets or general credit of the sponsoring organizations for the loan repayment. Despite the non-recourse(of limited recourse) nature of project borrowing, projects are highly leveraged entities: debt to total capitalization ratios average 60-70%, but can reach as high as 95% in some deals.
The stockholders in PF such as sponsors, banks may chose a vehicle considering various factors, such as the extend to which the sponsors is isolated from the risks and liabilities in the project, the tax efficacy. Even though, at present, we are not able to find a perfect form of corporation that con satisfy the stakeholder, Limited Liability Company is highly recommended because the company is a combination form of the managerial control of the corporations and flexibility and pass-through taxation benefit of partnerships. In addition, stockholders needs to enter into such agreement in order to escape the fault of the corporations and fill the gap between the defects in the corporate form and the double tax matters.
On the other hand, in the infrastructure PF, the public sector(government) and the private sectors(private companies, concessionaires) invariably enters into an concession agreement whereby the private sector agrees to design and construct the stated facilities by a certain date and operate the facilities for a period and transfer the ownership of the relevant facilities to the host government(in BOT type). Governments, concessionaires, and scholars traditionally have treated concession agreements as private, bilateral contracts between high-ranking national officials and the concessionaires. However, many concession agreements have failed to produce expected infrastructural, monetary, and efficiency gains because of the lack of due process in terns of selection of concessionaires and the public notice of their contents to the populace as well as transparency of the implementation of the concession agreements. Therefore we must observe the concession agreement on the sys of public policy. We may find good regime of entry into concession agreement in the PFI of U.K. and the PPPs of the EU. They may be treated as a form of cooperation between governments and private companies in natural resources development and infrastructure sector project or as a long-term contractual agreement.