RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    프로젝트 파이낸스(Project Finace)의 經濟的 主體와 讓許契約 = The Legally Economic Entities of Project Finance and the Concession Agreement

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Modern project finance("PF") has been invented in U.S., Tracing back to when independent oil companies particularly in Texas tried to find and extract oil, financial institution had betted that the resource, the oil was actually present and that it could be sold at a price that lived up to initial expectation, and provided funds relying only for cash flow generated by the resource. In the mechanism of PF, the sponsoring firms create legally distinct economic entities, so-called project company("PC"), to develop, manage, and finance the project. PC borrows on a limited or non-recourse basis from the bank on the condition that the banks are relying on the project's cash flows rather than on the assets or general credit of the sponsoring organizations for the loan repayment. Despite the non-recourse(of limited recourse) nature of project borrowing, projects are highly leveraged entities: debt to total capitalization ratios average 60-70%, but can reach as high as 95% in some deals.
    The stockholders in PF such as sponsors, banks may chose a vehicle considering various factors, such as the extend to which the sponsors is isolated from the risks and liabilities in the project, the tax efficacy. Even though, at present, we are not able to find a perfect form of corporation that con satisfy the stakeholder, Limited Liability Company is highly recommended because the company is a combination form of the managerial control of the corporations and flexibility and pass-through taxation benefit of partnerships. In addition, stockholders needs to enter into such agreement in order to escape the fault of the corporations and fill the gap between the defects in the corporate form and the double tax matters.
    On the other hand, in the infrastructure PF, the public sector(government) and the private sectors(private companies, concessionaires) invariably enters into an concession agreement whereby the private sector agrees to design and construct the stated facilities by a certain date and operate the facilities for a period and transfer the ownership of the relevant facilities to the host government(in BOT type). Governments, concessionaires, and scholars traditionally have treated concession agreements as private, bilateral contracts between high-ranking national officials and the concessionaires. However, many concession agreements have failed to produce expected infrastructural, monetary, and efficiency gains because of the lack of due process in terns of selection of concessionaires and the public notice of their contents to the populace as well as transparency of the implementation of the concession agreements. Therefore we must observe the concession agreement on the sys of public policy. We may find good regime of entry into concession agreement in the PFI of U.K. and the PPPs of the EU. They may be treated as a form of cooperation between governments and private companies in natural resources development and infrastructure sector project or as a long-term contractual agreement.
    번역하기

    Modern project finance("PF") has been invented in U.S., Tracing back to when independent oil companies particularly in Texas tried to find and extract oil, financial institution had betted that the resource, the oil was actually present and that it co...

    Modern project finance("PF") has been invented in U.S., Tracing back to when independent oil companies particularly in Texas tried to find and extract oil, financial institution had betted that the resource, the oil was actually present and that it could be sold at a price that lived up to initial expectation, and provided funds relying only for cash flow generated by the resource. In the mechanism of PF, the sponsoring firms create legally distinct economic entities, so-called project company("PC"), to develop, manage, and finance the project. PC borrows on a limited or non-recourse basis from the bank on the condition that the banks are relying on the project's cash flows rather than on the assets or general credit of the sponsoring organizations for the loan repayment. Despite the non-recourse(of limited recourse) nature of project borrowing, projects are highly leveraged entities: debt to total capitalization ratios average 60-70%, but can reach as high as 95% in some deals.
    The stockholders in PF such as sponsors, banks may chose a vehicle considering various factors, such as the extend to which the sponsors is isolated from the risks and liabilities in the project, the tax efficacy. Even though, at present, we are not able to find a perfect form of corporation that con satisfy the stakeholder, Limited Liability Company is highly recommended because the company is a combination form of the managerial control of the corporations and flexibility and pass-through taxation benefit of partnerships. In addition, stockholders needs to enter into such agreement in order to escape the fault of the corporations and fill the gap between the defects in the corporate form and the double tax matters.
    On the other hand, in the infrastructure PF, the public sector(government) and the private sectors(private companies, concessionaires) invariably enters into an concession agreement whereby the private sector agrees to design and construct the stated facilities by a certain date and operate the facilities for a period and transfer the ownership of the relevant facilities to the host government(in BOT type). Governments, concessionaires, and scholars traditionally have treated concession agreements as private, bilateral contracts between high-ranking national officials and the concessionaires. However, many concession agreements have failed to produce expected infrastructural, monetary, and efficiency gains because of the lack of due process in terns of selection of concessionaires and the public notice of their contents to the populace as well as transparency of the implementation of the concession agreements. Therefore we must observe the concession agreement on the sys of public policy. We may find good regime of entry into concession agreement in the PFI of U.K. and the PPPs of the EU. They may be treated as a form of cooperation between governments and private companies in natural resources development and infrastructure sector project or as a long-term contractual agreement.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 프로젝트 파이낸스의 經濟的 主體
    • Ⅲ. 프로젝트 파이낸스에서의 讓許契約
    • Ⅳ. 마치는 글
    • 【參考文獻】
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 프로젝트 파이낸스의 經濟的 主體
    • Ⅲ. 프로젝트 파이낸스에서의 讓許契約
    • Ⅳ. 마치는 글
    • 【參考文獻】
    • [Abstract]
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼