RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    매천 황현의 당대사 인식을 둘러싼 논의 = Discussion of Recognotion about Contemporary History by Hwang hyun

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104574156

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines several issues about the controversy for recognition about Contemporary History by Hwang hyun(黃玹, 1855~1919). Main discussion reference for this study is his writing Maechunyarok(梅泉野錄). This book is not actual history book, but it has high material value about history of invasion of Japanese empire and falling of nation.
    Hwang hyun was a traditional student of confucianism, and confucian value organized basement of his ideology and thought. However, he was not just burying in thinking of Wejungchuksa, and he exclaimed the enlightenment. His enlightenment was medieval order reinforcement of centralization by monarchy, and this was different from westernization and civilization by people who favored enlightenment. It was discussion that showed his view of the world of Hwaegwan. Although his thinking of enlightenment has partial progressive section, but his evaluation like person of aiming modern time is excessive evaluation.
    He did not exclaim any invasion or independence for Chung Dynasty, which was different view for Japan and Russia. However, he sharply understood political invasion and essense of economic invasion by Japan. Recognition for Russia was not friendly as that for Chung Dynasty, but it was less critical than recognition for Japan. Recognition for Western civilization was not exhaustive, but he showed negative recognition for Western civilization through description of western study. However, he was sure that subject of invasion on Korea was Japan, and his description for Western civilization became objective after 1904.
    After 1907, Mae-chun showed an interest about resistance fight and relationship with resistance because Japanese invasion became more obvious. He also participated on skill training and enlightenment activity. With these factors, we know that he was not burying in specific ideology and methodology. He mainly focused on recovery of nation rights, and he worked hard for this. However, he suicided to sacrifice himself for his country to perform his duty as a learned man because of the fall of nation.
    Therefore, Hwang hyun should be evaluated as person who aggressively resisted Japanese invasion with using resistance fight, enlightenment activity, fight for heroic and noble mind, which are ethnic activity in the last of this nation.
    번역하기

    This study examines several issues about the controversy for recognition about Contemporary History by Hwang hyun(黃玹, 1855~1919). Main discussion reference for this study is his writing Maechunyarok(梅泉野錄). This book is not actual history...

    This study examines several issues about the controversy for recognition about Contemporary History by Hwang hyun(黃玹, 1855~1919). Main discussion reference for this study is his writing Maechunyarok(梅泉野錄). This book is not actual history book, but it has high material value about history of invasion of Japanese empire and falling of nation.
    Hwang hyun was a traditional student of confucianism, and confucian value organized basement of his ideology and thought. However, he was not just burying in thinking of Wejungchuksa, and he exclaimed the enlightenment. His enlightenment was medieval order reinforcement of centralization by monarchy, and this was different from westernization and civilization by people who favored enlightenment. It was discussion that showed his view of the world of Hwaegwan. Although his thinking of enlightenment has partial progressive section, but his evaluation like person of aiming modern time is excessive evaluation.
    He did not exclaim any invasion or independence for Chung Dynasty, which was different view for Japan and Russia. However, he sharply understood political invasion and essense of economic invasion by Japan. Recognition for Russia was not friendly as that for Chung Dynasty, but it was less critical than recognition for Japan. Recognition for Western civilization was not exhaustive, but he showed negative recognition for Western civilization through description of western study. However, he was sure that subject of invasion on Korea was Japan, and his description for Western civilization became objective after 1904.
    After 1907, Mae-chun showed an interest about resistance fight and relationship with resistance because Japanese invasion became more obvious. He also participated on skill training and enlightenment activity. With these factors, we know that he was not burying in specific ideology and methodology. He mainly focused on recovery of nation rights, and he worked hard for this. However, he suicided to sacrifice himself for his country to perform his duty as a learned man because of the fall of nation.
    Therefore, Hwang hyun should be evaluated as person who aggressively resisted Japanese invasion with using resistance fight, enlightenment activity, fight for heroic and noble mind, which are ethnic activity in the last of this nation.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 임영택, "역주 매천야록" 문학과 지성사 2005

    2 박걸순, "시대의 선각자 혁신 유림 류인식" 지식산업사 2010

    3 임형택, "매천야록 해제" 문학과 지성사 2005

    4 河宇鳳, "黃玹의 歷史意識에 대한 硏究" 6 : 1982

    5 洪以燮, "黃玹의 歷史意識" 4 : 1969

    6 洪以燮, "黃玹의 歷史意識" 연세대학교 인문과학연구소 27 : 1972

    7 崔洪奎, "黃玹의 현실의식과 역사 감각" 한국사상연구회 17 : 1980

    8 李章熙, "黃玹의 生涯와 思想" (60) : 1978

    9 金項, "黃玹의 新學問 受容과 ‘壺陽學校’ 設立" 한국문화사학회 (21) : 995-1010, 2004

    10 愼鏞廈, "黃玹全集 解題 in: 黃玹全集" 아세아문화사 1978

    1 임영택, "역주 매천야록" 문학과 지성사 2005

    2 박걸순, "시대의 선각자 혁신 유림 류인식" 지식산업사 2010

    3 임형택, "매천야록 해제" 문학과 지성사 2005

    4 河宇鳳, "黃玹의 歷史意識에 대한 硏究" 6 : 1982

    5 洪以燮, "黃玹의 歷史意識" 4 : 1969

    6 洪以燮, "黃玹의 歷史意識" 연세대학교 인문과학연구소 27 : 1972

    7 崔洪奎, "黃玹의 현실의식과 역사 감각" 한국사상연구회 17 : 1980

    8 李章熙, "黃玹의 生涯와 思想" (60) : 1978

    9 金項, "黃玹의 新學問 受容과 ‘壺陽學校’ 設立" 한국문화사학회 (21) : 995-1010, 2004

    10 愼鏞廈, "黃玹全集 解題 in: 黃玹全集" 아세아문화사 1978

    11 "黃玹全集" 아세아문화사 1978

    12 金昌洙, "韓國近代의 民族意識硏究" 동화출판공사 1987

    13 金澤榮, "韓史綮" 中央大學校附設人文學硏究所

    14 李光麟, "舊韓末關西地方儒學者의 思想的轉回 in: 開化派와 開化思想硏究" 일조각 1991

    15 오세철, "舊韓末社會變動과 社會心理體系의 相互作用에 대한 分析―梅泉野錄을 중심으로―" (29) : 1981

    16 金榥, "看梅泉野錄" 8 : 1955

    17 崔惠珠, "滄江金澤榮의 韓國史論" 한울 1996

    18 李相寔, "梅泉黃玹의 歷史意識" 전남사학회 8 : 1978

    19 金昌洙, "梅泉黃玹의 民族意識" (33) : 1981

    20 黃玹, "梅泉野錄" 國史編纂委員會 1955

    21 박걸순, "東山柳寅植의 歷史認識 in: 植民地시기의 歷史學과 歷史認識" 경인문화사 2004

    22 鄭喬, "大韓季年史" 國史編纂委員會 1957

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.66 0.66 0.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.65 0.62 1.675 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼