RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    라카토스식「국가안보 프로그램」발전을 통해 본 안보 개념의 심화와 확대

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76176082

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study intends to identify conceptual differences between traditional and non-traditional security, and to present an explanatory framework for analysis to explicate the shift from traditional security to non-traditional security. This study does not present the Kuhn's paradigm shift but a progress of a scientific research program for a framework for analysis to explain the change from traditional to non-traditional security. The framework of a scientific research program, basically developed by Imre Lakatos, regards a theory as a specific structure and consequently sees a complex theory as a structured whole. According to the logic of the scientific research program, the evolution of science is proceeded in the form of a specific structure. As a scientific research program, the National Security Research Program(hereafter NSRP) is composed of some hard-cores and a protective belt. Hard-cores of the NSRP are both a state-centricity and a military centricity. More specifically, the main subject of the traditional security is the state, and the main means of security is the military. Since the formation of the modem world system, state has been a main actor in the international system. State has been using the military forces as a most useful method in pursuing state gains and state interests. The state-centricity and military-centricity in the security community was most strong during the Cold War period. The property of state and military centricity is closely related to the states outer sovereignty based upon territory. The challenges of sub-national and trans-national sovereignty in the post-Cold War era, mainly provided the advent of global governance, are associated with are new threat to traditional security program. To what degree and how much the advent of global governance will threat to the traditional security program depends upon the degree of collapse of hard-cores of the NSRP. Unless the new challenge to the SRP destroys the state and military centricity of the NSRP, the traditional security program will survive surrounded by the protective belt.
    번역하기

    This study intends to identify conceptual differences between traditional and non-traditional security, and to present an explanatory framework for analysis to explicate the shift from traditional security to non-traditional security. This study does ...

    This study intends to identify conceptual differences between traditional and non-traditional security, and to present an explanatory framework for analysis to explicate the shift from traditional security to non-traditional security. This study does not present the Kuhn's paradigm shift but a progress of a scientific research program for a framework for analysis to explain the change from traditional to non-traditional security. The framework of a scientific research program, basically developed by Imre Lakatos, regards a theory as a specific structure and consequently sees a complex theory as a structured whole. According to the logic of the scientific research program, the evolution of science is proceeded in the form of a specific structure. As a scientific research program, the National Security Research Program(hereafter NSRP) is composed of some hard-cores and a protective belt. Hard-cores of the NSRP are both a state-centricity and a military centricity. More specifically, the main subject of the traditional security is the state, and the main means of security is the military. Since the formation of the modem world system, state has been a main actor in the international system. State has been using the military forces as a most useful method in pursuing state gains and state interests. The state-centricity and military-centricity in the security community was most strong during the Cold War period. The property of state and military centricity is closely related to the states outer sovereignty based upon territory. The challenges of sub-national and trans-national sovereignty in the post-Cold War era, mainly provided the advent of global governance, are associated with are new threat to traditional security program. To what degree and how much the advent of global governance will threat to the traditional security program depends upon the degree of collapse of hard-cores of the NSRP. Unless the new challenge to the SRP destroys the state and military centricity of the NSRP, the traditional security program will survive surrounded by the protective belt.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼