RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국과 미국 국가수준 학업성취도 평가의 성취수준 비교 = Validity of NAEA Achievement Levels compared with NAEP and TIMSS

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99620524

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate validity of achievement levels in National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA) compared with NAEP and TIMSS.Even though each testing program had unique purpose and framework, the results of NAEA for 9th grades were analyzed in terms of definitions of achievement levels and relative locations of cut-off scores (z scores). As results, the percentage of NAEA ``advanced level`` was too high and the percentage of ``below basic`` was too low by considering the results of NAEP. NAEA reported that Korean students made positive changes in terms of knowledge and skills, while no progress was found in the Korean data of TIMSS. These inconsistent results were rooted in variations of the definitions of achievement levels and location of cut-off scores. Also, it seemed to be related to knowledge focused achievement level descriptions, relatively high cut-off scores of ``advanced level``, and lower cut-off scores of ``basic level`` in NAEA compared with NAEP and TIMSS. So periodical validation studies on achievement levels should be conducted by considering changes of test contents, formats and scale scores of NAEA. In addition, the limitations of the current study and suggestions for further research were provided.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate validity of achievement levels in National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA) compared with NAEP and TIMSS.Even though each testing program had unique purpose and framework, the results of NAEA for 9...

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate validity of achievement levels in National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA) compared with NAEP and TIMSS.Even though each testing program had unique purpose and framework, the results of NAEA for 9th grades were analyzed in terms of definitions of achievement levels and relative locations of cut-off scores (z scores). As results, the percentage of NAEA ``advanced level`` was too high and the percentage of ``below basic`` was too low by considering the results of NAEP. NAEA reported that Korean students made positive changes in terms of knowledge and skills, while no progress was found in the Korean data of TIMSS. These inconsistent results were rooted in variations of the definitions of achievement levels and location of cut-off scores. Also, it seemed to be related to knowledge focused achievement level descriptions, relatively high cut-off scores of ``advanced level``, and lower cut-off scores of ``basic level`` in NAEA compared with NAEP and TIMSS. So periodical validation studies on achievement levels should be conducted by considering changes of test contents, formats and scale scores of NAEA. In addition, the limitations of the current study and suggestions for further research were provided.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이화진, "기초학력 미달 여부에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 - 학력향상 중점학교 유형별 비교" 한국교육과정평가원 14 (14): 151-176, 2011

    2 조지민, "국가수준 학업성취도 평가연구 - 2003∼2006년 변화 추이" 한국교육과정평가원 2007

    3 김경희, "국가수준 학업성취도 평가에 나타난 우리나라 학력 향상의 특성 분석" 한국교육과정평가원 2011

    4 박정, "국가수준 학업성취도 평가 변화 추이 (2003-2005년) -중학교 3학년" 한국교육과정평가원 2006

    5 김성숙, "국가수준 학업성취도 평가 개선 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2009

    6 김경희, "교육정보 공시 위한 향상도 산출 모형 탐색과 향후 전망" 한국교육과정평가원 2011

    7 CELE, "Uncommon Measures: Equivalent and Linkage among educational Tests" National Academy 1999

    8 NCES, "The National Report Card: Mathematics 2009" NCES 2010

    9 Martin, M. O., "TIMSS 2007 International Science Report: Findings from IEA;s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grade" Boston College 2008

    10 Mullis, I. V. S, "TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA;s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grade" Boston College 2008

    1 이화진, "기초학력 미달 여부에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 - 학력향상 중점학교 유형별 비교" 한국교육과정평가원 14 (14): 151-176, 2011

    2 조지민, "국가수준 학업성취도 평가연구 - 2003∼2006년 변화 추이" 한국교육과정평가원 2007

    3 김경희, "국가수준 학업성취도 평가에 나타난 우리나라 학력 향상의 특성 분석" 한국교육과정평가원 2011

    4 박정, "국가수준 학업성취도 평가 변화 추이 (2003-2005년) -중학교 3학년" 한국교육과정평가원 2006

    5 김성숙, "국가수준 학업성취도 평가 개선 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2009

    6 김경희, "교육정보 공시 위한 향상도 산출 모형 탐색과 향후 전망" 한국교육과정평가원 2011

    7 CELE, "Uncommon Measures: Equivalent and Linkage among educational Tests" National Academy 1999

    8 NCES, "The National Report Card: Mathematics 2009" NCES 2010

    9 Martin, M. O., "TIMSS 2007 International Science Report: Findings from IEA;s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grade" Boston College 2008

    10 Mullis, I. V. S, "TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA;s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grade" Boston College 2008

    11 McLaughlin, D., "Study of the linkage of 1996 NAEP and State Mathematics assessment in four states" American Institute for Research 1998

    12 Cizek, G. J., "Standard Setting" Sage 2007

    13 Angoff, W. H., "Scales, norms, and equivalent scores, In Educational Measurement" American Council on Education 508-600, 1971

    14 U.S. Department of Education, "Grade 4, 8, 12 National Reports"

    15 Linn, R. L., "Educational accountability systems. In The Future of Test-Based Educational Accountability" Routledge 3-24, 2008

    16 Hong, W-P., "Does high-stakes testing increase cultural capital among low-income and racial minority students" 16 (16): 2007

    17 National Assessment Governing Board, "Developing student performance levels for the national assessment of educational progress policy statement" Author 1995

    18 Linn, R. L., "Conflicting demands of No Childe Left Behind and State Systems: Mixed Messages about school performance" 13 (13): 2005

    19 McCombs, J. S, "Achieving state and national literacy goals, a long uphill road. TR-180" Rand 2004

    20 Linn, R. L., "Accountability: Responsibility and reasonable expectations" 32 (32): 3-13, 2003

    21 Bourque, M. L., "A history of NAEP achievement levels: Issues, implementation, and impact 1989-2009" 2009

    22 교육과학기술부, "2010 교과부 업무보고: 교육과학기술 선진화로 세계인류국가 도약" 교육과학기술부 2009

    23 김성숙, "2009년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 전수분석 결과 - 중학교 3학년" 한국교육과정평가원 2010

    24 정구향, "2003년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구 - 총론" 한국교육과정평가원 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-03-24 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SECONDARY EDUCATION RESEARCH KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.63 1.63 1.42
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.38 1.27 1.781 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼