RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    숫자 바로 따라 외우기와 거꾸로 따로 외우기의 차이에 관한 규준 연구 = Korean norm for the difference between digits forward and digits backward

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104697153

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The traditional method of scoring Digit Span Test is to sum the scores of digits forward (DF) and digits backward (DB). However, several researchers have articulated the need for scoring DF and DB separately and comparing the two. The WAIS-III accepts the view and includes a U.S. norm for the difference between DF and DB. However, no Korean norm for the difference between DF and DB has been published yet. Thus, the aim of the present study was to provide a Korean norm for the difference between DF and DB. A total of 201 Korean normal subjects were administered DF and DB. The effects of age, years of education, or FIQ on the difference between DF and DB were minimal and statistically nonsignificant. Thus, the norm for the difference between DF and DB was constructed regardless of age, years of education, or FIQ. The unit of measurement for the norm was the number of digits forward minus the number of digits backward. The difference of 3 or smaller corresponded to 35.3%ile and may be classified as normal; the difference of 4 corresponded to 16.4%ile and may be classified as borderline; and the difference of 5 or greater corresponded to 6.5%ile and may be classified as abnormal. The DF requires short-term maintenance of information, whereas the DB requires short-term manipulation as well as short-term maintenance of information. Thus, the DF is a short-term memory task, whereas the DB is both a short-term memory task and a working memory task. Viewed in this way, the difference between DF and DB could be used as an index of working memory capacity.
    번역하기

    The traditional method of scoring Digit Span Test is to sum the scores of digits forward (DF) and digits backward (DB). However, several researchers have articulated the need for scoring DF and DB separately and comparing the two. The WAIS-III accepts...

    The traditional method of scoring Digit Span Test is to sum the scores of digits forward (DF) and digits backward (DB). However, several researchers have articulated the need for scoring DF and DB separately and comparing the two. The WAIS-III accepts the view and includes a U.S. norm for the difference between DF and DB. However, no Korean norm for the difference between DF and DB has been published yet. Thus, the aim of the present study was to provide a Korean norm for the difference between DF and DB. A total of 201 Korean normal subjects were administered DF and DB. The effects of age, years of education, or FIQ on the difference between DF and DB were minimal and statistically nonsignificant. Thus, the norm for the difference between DF and DB was constructed regardless of age, years of education, or FIQ. The unit of measurement for the norm was the number of digits forward minus the number of digits backward. The difference of 3 or smaller corresponded to 35.3%ile and may be classified as normal; the difference of 4 corresponded to 16.4%ile and may be classified as borderline; and the difference of 5 or greater corresponded to 6.5%ile and may be classified as abnormal. The DF requires short-term maintenance of information, whereas the DB requires short-term manipulation as well as short-term maintenance of information. Thus, the DF is a short-term memory task, whereas the DB is both a short-term memory task and a working memory task. Viewed in this way, the difference between DF and DB could be used as an index of working memory capacity.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-03-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국심리학회지 임상 -> Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology KCI등재
    2016-02-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology -> Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology KCI등재
    2014-04-10 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society Of Clinical Psychology -> Korean Clinical Psychology Association KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국심리학회 산하 임상심리학회 -> 한국임상심리학회 KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.36 1.36 1.6
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.69 1.77 2.966 0.3
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼