RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Working Memory Capacity, Vocabulary Knowledge, and Reading Comprehension of EFL Learners

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99609277

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study examined the combined and relative predictive powers of working memory capacity (WMC) and vocabulary knowledge in literal and inferential reading comprehension of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. To that end, forty-six university students in Korea performed a battery of tests: (a) the reading span task as a measure of WMC; (b) the Nelson-Denny Comprehension Test; and (c) the Vocabulary Test. Results showed that WMC and vocabulary knowledge accounted for 21.7% of the variance in literal reading comprehension scores with a medium effect size. With regard to inferential reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge alone explained 33.1% of the variance with a large effect size. Concerning relative predictive values, WMC was more useful than vocabulary knowledge in explaining literal reading comprehension performance, whereas in inferential reading comprehension, text-specific vocabulary knowledge was the only significant predictor.
      번역하기

      This study examined the combined and relative predictive powers of working memory capacity (WMC) and vocabulary knowledge in literal and inferential reading comprehension of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. To that end, forty-six universi...

      This study examined the combined and relative predictive powers of working memory capacity (WMC) and vocabulary knowledge in literal and inferential reading comprehension of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. To that end, forty-six university students in Korea performed a battery of tests: (a) the reading span task as a measure of WMC; (b) the Nelson-Denny Comprehension Test; and (c) the Vocabulary Test. Results showed that WMC and vocabulary knowledge accounted for 21.7% of the variance in literal reading comprehension scores with a medium effect size. With regard to inferential reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge alone explained 33.1% of the variance with a large effect size. Concerning relative predictive values, WMC was more useful than vocabulary knowledge in explaining literal reading comprehension performance, whereas in inferential reading comprehension, text-specific vocabulary knowledge was the only significant predictor.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
      • Ⅱ. LITERATURE REVIEW
      • Ⅲ. THE PRESENT STUDY
      • Ⅳ. METHOD
      • Ⅴ. RESULTS
      • Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
      • Ⅱ. LITERATURE REVIEW
      • Ⅲ. THE PRESENT STUDY
      • Ⅳ. METHOD
      • Ⅴ. RESULTS
      • Ⅵ. DISCUSSION
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼