‘중국 영화’에서 ‘중국’은 무엇을 의미하나? ― 중국 영화를 경계 짓는 개념들에 대한 비판적 검토 = What Does ‘Chinese’ Mean in ‘Chinese Cinema’? : A Critical Examination on the Concepts to Circumscribe the Boundary of Chinese Cinema

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Although the concept of ‘Chinese cinema’ usually refers to films from mainland China, it is often employed to encompass films from mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. The full-fledged academic interest in ‘Chinese cinema’ has begun along with the emergence of the Fifth-Generation Chinese films in the 1980s. At that time, English-speaking researchers used to include Taiwanese and Hong Kong films as the categories of Chinese films without much consideration when discussing Chinese Fifth-Generation films. However, as they gradually realized mainland Chinese film, Taiwanese film, and Hong Kong film have different historical contexts respectively, the boundary of Chinese cinema became an important academic task.
The concept of ‘transnational Chinese cinemas’ proposed by Sheldon Lu in 1997 was the first academic term to theorize this problem. Recalling the fact that Chinese cinema was “an event of transnational capital from its beginning”, he argued that mainland, Taiwanese and Hong Kong have something to signify ‘China’ in common in the transnational context. And he tried to focus on language that makes the films of these three regions converge into a single frame of ‘Chinese cinema.’ Thus, he suggested another concept of ‘Chinese-language film’ to specify the ground for this inclusive boundary. The term of ‘Chinese-language film’ is generally translated into ‘huayudianying(華語電影)’ in the Chinese academic field, however, this term has the different meanings depending on the political position. While Chinese scholars usually use this term to cover all regions of the mainland, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, for foreign scholars, it refers to a film that speaks Chinese dialects, not Mandarin, the standard language of mainland China. In this sense, huayudianying resonates with the concept of ‘sinophone cinema,’ which emphasizes the diversity and differences of overseas Chinese cinemas. Meanwhile, Chris Berry criticizes these discussions for being based too much on language, and proposes the concept of ‘cinemas of sinosphere’ which address China with a more comprehensive perspective. He points out that Chinese cinema is inherently related to Chinese culture, not based solely on region or language. For example, Chinese cinema studies may include not only films that speak Chinese ethnic minority languages such as Amei language in Taiwan or Tibetan in mainland, but also films made in English outside of China. This is because what the films address is Chinese culture in the long run.
In this sense, the research subjects of Chinese film scholars are not be limited to films within Chinese territory or Chinese-speaking films, but may be expanded to various films addressing Chinese culture or ‘the Chinese.’ At this time, Chinese cinema studies might be able to explore the relationship between cinema and ‘the national’ in a productive way, emancipated from the exhausting efforts to define the nationality of the film. And this can provide an productive perspective to examine how cinema constructs or changes ‘China’ rather than a passive attitude that China is simply reflected in the film.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김소영, "트랜스 : 아시아 영상문화" 현실문화연구 2006

2 임대근, "중국"비(非)-한족(漢族)"영화 연구를 위한 논의들" 42 : 2011

3 임대근, "중국 영화학을 둘레 짓기 위한 한 가지 물음 : 중국 영화학은 웨인왕의 영화를 다룰 수 있는가?" (32) : 2005

4 임대근, "중국 영화 둘레 짓기" 28 : 2001

5 임춘성, "중국 근현대문학의 자발적 타자, 사이노폰 문학" 3 (3): 2021

6 왕더웨이, "시노폰 담론, 중국 문학" 학고방 2017

7 스수메이, "시각과 정체성: 태평양을 넘어서는 시노폰 언술" 학고방 2021

8 이재현, "사이노폰 연구와 비판적 중국연구" 3 (3): 2021

9 許維賢, "華語電影的說法和起源-回應近年的華語電影爭論" (5) : 2017

10 魯曉鵬, "華語電影槪念探微" (5) : 2014

11 吳海淸, "華語電影抑或華人電影-華語電影槪念的反思" (4) : 2012

12 張韻, "槪念的多維生産與理論化的思辨座標–"華語電影"再思考" (8) : 2017

13 Berry, Chris, "What is transnational Chinese Cinema today? Or, Welcome to the Sinosphere" 12 (12): 2021

14 Lu, Sheldon H., "Transnational Chinese Cinemas: Identity, Nationhood, Gender" University of Hawaii Press 1997

15 Rayns, Tony, "The Fifth Generation: A New Cinema in China" 53 (53): 1986

16 Yoshimoto, Mitsuhiro, "The Difficulty of Being Radical: The Discipline of Film Studies and the Postcolonial World Order" 18 (18): 1991

17 Yue, Audrey, "Sinophone Cinemas" Palgrave Macmillan 2014

18 Chow, Rey, "Primitive Passions" Columbia University Press 1995

19 Berry, Chris, "Perspective on Chinese Cinema" BFI 1991

20 Lu, Sheldon H., "Notes on Four Major Pardigms in Chinese-language Film Studies" 6 (6): 2012

21 Browne, Nick, "New Chinese Cinemas: Forms, Identities, Politics" University of Cambridge Press 1994

22 Willemen, Paul, "Looks and Frictions : Essays in Cultureal Studies and Film Theory" BFI 1994

23 Berry, Chris, "Introduction, or What’s in an ‘s’?" 2 (2): 2008

24 Yue, Audrey, "From Diasporic Cinemas to Sinophone Cinemas: An Introduction" 6 (6): 2012

25 Leyda, Jay, "Dianying : An Account of Films and the Film Audience in China" MIT Press 1972

26 Lu, Sheldon H., "Chinese-Language Film: Historiography, Poetics, Politic" University of Hawaii Press 2005

27 Clark, Paul, "Chinese Cinema : Culture and Politics Since 1949" University of Cambridge Press 1987

28 Berry, Chris, "China on Screen: Cinema and Nation" Columbia University Press 2006

29 Ang, Ien, "Can One Say No to Chineseness?: Pushing the Limits of Diasporic Paradigm" 25 (25): 1998

30 Lim, Song Hwee, "A New Beginning: Possible Directions in Chinese Cinemas Studies" 1 (1): 2006

31 鐘大豊, ""華語電影"與電影的"國籍"認定" (1) : 2017