RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국제적 근로관계에 대한 준거법 결정에 대한 시론 = An introductory study on determining the applicable law for an international employment contract

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106279696

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There seems to be no firmly-established principle with regard to determining the applicable law for the international employment contract yet despite the growing importance of the matter in the modern day global economy. In order to solve such problem, the ‘Foreign Factor’ in the Article 1 of the Private International Law is needed to be widely interpreted to cover the international employment matters.




    However, there still remains a problem with such application of Private International Law to the international employment contract: the interpretation theory of the Private International Law itself is yet to be firmly established. Against such backdrop, it is believed that, in principle, an international employment contract shall be governed by the law of the country where the employee habitually provides his/her service as stipulated in the Article 28 of the Private International Law, provided however, the parties may decide which law to apply by mutual agreement unless such application does not work unfavorably to the employee (Article 25). Of course, in case the applicable law specified by such reasoning is found less related to the corresponding legal relations and the law of another country is found most closely connected with such legal relation, the law of the other country should apply as prescribed in the Article 8 of the Private International Law. However, the Article 8 should only be acknowledged as an exception. Thus, it is believed that there are two criteria that should be considered in determining the applicable law to the international employment contract: one, which law governs the country where the employee habitually provides his/her services, two, whether the parties have made a mutual agreement on which law to apply regarding the employment contract.




    Further, the question of who the employer is should be differentiated from which law is applicable to the relevant employment relationship. Though it is required to confirm who the employer is as a prerequisite matter to the decision of applicable law, the applicable law should not decided by the factors like who the employer is or whether a global company has established a corporate personality or not. That is to say, the applicable law should not be decided upon whether the employer is a Korean corporation or foreign. For instance, if the employment relationship retains some Foreign Factors since the employee mainly works outside Korea, it should be first considered which law is applicable in the light of the principles of Private International Law, even when the both parties belongs to the Korean nationality.
    번역하기

    There seems to be no firmly-established principle with regard to determining the applicable law for the international employment contract yet despite the growing importance of the matter in the modern day global economy. In order to solve such problem...

    There seems to be no firmly-established principle with regard to determining the applicable law for the international employment contract yet despite the growing importance of the matter in the modern day global economy. In order to solve such problem, the ‘Foreign Factor’ in the Article 1 of the Private International Law is needed to be widely interpreted to cover the international employment matters.




    However, there still remains a problem with such application of Private International Law to the international employment contract: the interpretation theory of the Private International Law itself is yet to be firmly established. Against such backdrop, it is believed that, in principle, an international employment contract shall be governed by the law of the country where the employee habitually provides his/her service as stipulated in the Article 28 of the Private International Law, provided however, the parties may decide which law to apply by mutual agreement unless such application does not work unfavorably to the employee (Article 25). Of course, in case the applicable law specified by such reasoning is found less related to the corresponding legal relations and the law of another country is found most closely connected with such legal relation, the law of the other country should apply as prescribed in the Article 8 of the Private International Law. However, the Article 8 should only be acknowledged as an exception. Thus, it is believed that there are two criteria that should be considered in determining the applicable law to the international employment contract: one, which law governs the country where the employee habitually provides his/her services, two, whether the parties have made a mutual agreement on which law to apply regarding the employment contract.




    Further, the question of who the employer is should be differentiated from which law is applicable to the relevant employment relationship. Though it is required to confirm who the employer is as a prerequisite matter to the decision of applicable law, the applicable law should not decided by the factors like who the employer is or whether a global company has established a corporate personality or not. That is to say, the applicable law should not be decided upon whether the employer is a Korean corporation or foreign. For instance, if the employment relationship retains some Foreign Factors since the employee mainly works outside Korea, it should be first considered which law is applicable in the light of the principles of Private International Law, even when the both parties belongs to the Korean nationality.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 석광현, "한국인간에 일본에서 체결된 근로계약의 준거법" 민사판례연구회 (31) : 567-622, 2009

    2 김지형, "국제적 근로계약의 준거법" (68) : 2002

    3 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송 제5권" 박영사 [서울] 2012

    4 사법연수원, "국제사법과 국제민사소송"

    5 법무부, "국제사법 해설"

    6 신창섭, "국제사법" 세창출판사

    7 김인호, "국제사법" 박영사 2012

    8 신창섭, "국제사법" 도서출판 피데스 2006

    9 석광현, "국제근로계약과 근로자보호-개정 국제사법을 중심으로-" (13) : 2001

    10 김원규, "국제계약에 있어서 당사자자치의 제한에 관한 연구" 한국법학회 (27) : 459-484, 2007

    1 석광현, "한국인간에 일본에서 체결된 근로계약의 준거법" 민사판례연구회 (31) : 567-622, 2009

    2 김지형, "국제적 근로계약의 준거법" (68) : 2002

    3 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송 제5권" 박영사 [서울] 2012

    4 사법연수원, "국제사법과 국제민사소송"

    5 법무부, "국제사법 해설"

    6 신창섭, "국제사법" 세창출판사

    7 김인호, "국제사법" 박영사 2012

    8 신창섭, "국제사법" 도서출판 피데스 2006

    9 석광현, "국제근로계약과 근로자보호-개정 국제사법을 중심으로-" (13) : 2001

    10 김원규, "국제계약에 있어서 당사자자치의 제한에 관한 연구" 한국법학회 (27) : 459-484, 2007

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.64 0.64 0.58
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.61 0.56 0.832 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼