RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SCOPUS KCI등재

      급성 담낭염의 비수술적 담낭배액술 - 내시경적 경비 담낭배액술 및 경피경간 담낭배액술을 중심으로 = Nonsurgical Cholecystic Drainage in Acute Cholecystitis급성 담낭염의 비수술적 담낭배액술 - 내시경적 경비 담낭배액술 및 경피경간 담낭배액술을 중심으로

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: Acute cholecystitis is the most common biliary emergency and until now, the choice of the treatment of this disease is surgical operation. But, the. Mortality and morbidity associated with surgical cholecystostomy in those patients are relatively high. Recently, PTCCD and ENGBD were developed as a useful method of nonsurgical cholecystic drainage in high surgical risk group of acute cholecystitis. The purpose of this study was tn assess the usefulness of nonsurgical cholecystic drainage such as PTCCD and ENCrBD in the patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods: Of 59 patients with acute cholecystitis treated with nonsurgical cholecystic drainage, 47 were calculous cholecystitis and 12 were acalculous cholecystitis. Nonsurgical chole- cystic drainages were successful in all 59 cases: PTCCD in 45 patients, ENGBD in rernaining 14 patients. 39 patients were treated with nonsurgical cholecystic drainages due to high surgical risk. In remaining 20 patients there were cholangiocarcinoma in 5 patients, netastatic heptna in 2, gallstone pancreatitis in 1, advanced gastric cancer in 2, refusal of surgery in 10. Results: The prompt clinical recovery were achieved in 42 patients(93.3%) with PTCCD and cornpletely in all 2 cases with ENGBD. In the group with 35 calculous cholecystitis performed PTCCD, 28 under- went PTCCS-L, 4 elective surgery and 3 died because of the underlying condition, In the group with 10 acalculous cholecystitis performed PTC(D, 8 patients need nr further treatment except drainage and remaining 2 patients underwent elective surgery. Jn the group with 12 calculous cholecystitis treated by ENGBD, 10 underwent elective surgery, l F.SWI. And I gallstone dissolu- tion with MTBE. In 2 acalculous cholecystitis treated by ENGBD, the one patient took no further treatment and the other underwent elective surgery. Complications related to PT( CD occurred in 10 of 45 patients, but there was no mortality re]ated to this procedure. No complications were noted related to ENGBD. Conclusions: We conclude that nonsurgical cholecystic drainage witli ENGBD and PTCCD were safe, effective and useful procedures for the management of acute cholecystitis, especially in high surgical risk group, (Korean J Gastroenterol 1997; 30:81 - 89)
      번역하기

      Background/Aims: Acute cholecystitis is the most common biliary emergency and until now, the choice of the treatment of this disease is surgical operation. But, the. Mortality and morbidity associated with surgical cholecystostomy in those patients ar...

      Background/Aims: Acute cholecystitis is the most common biliary emergency and until now, the choice of the treatment of this disease is surgical operation. But, the. Mortality and morbidity associated with surgical cholecystostomy in those patients are relatively high. Recently, PTCCD and ENGBD were developed as a useful method of nonsurgical cholecystic drainage in high surgical risk group of acute cholecystitis. The purpose of this study was tn assess the usefulness of nonsurgical cholecystic drainage such as PTCCD and ENCrBD in the patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods: Of 59 patients with acute cholecystitis treated with nonsurgical cholecystic drainage, 47 were calculous cholecystitis and 12 were acalculous cholecystitis. Nonsurgical chole- cystic drainages were successful in all 59 cases: PTCCD in 45 patients, ENGBD in rernaining 14 patients. 39 patients were treated with nonsurgical cholecystic drainages due to high surgical risk. In remaining 20 patients there were cholangiocarcinoma in 5 patients, netastatic heptna in 2, gallstone pancreatitis in 1, advanced gastric cancer in 2, refusal of surgery in 10. Results: The prompt clinical recovery were achieved in 42 patients(93.3%) with PTCCD and cornpletely in all 2 cases with ENGBD. In the group with 35 calculous cholecystitis performed PTCCD, 28 under- went PTCCS-L, 4 elective surgery and 3 died because of the underlying condition, In the group with 10 acalculous cholecystitis performed PTC(D, 8 patients need nr further treatment except drainage and remaining 2 patients underwent elective surgery. Jn the group with 12 calculous cholecystitis treated by ENGBD, 10 underwent elective surgery, l F.SWI. And I gallstone dissolu- tion with MTBE. In 2 acalculous cholecystitis treated by ENGBD, the one patient took no further treatment and the other underwent elective surgery. Complications related to PT( CD occurred in 10 of 45 patients, but there was no mortality re]ated to this procedure. No complications were noted related to ENGBD. Conclusions: We conclude that nonsurgical cholecystic drainage witli ENGBD and PTCCD were safe, effective and useful procedures for the management of acute cholecystitis, especially in high surgical risk group, (Korean J Gastroenterol 1997; 30:81 - 89)

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼