RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    메이지헌법의 성립 및 패전 후 일본국헌법으로의 전개과정 = The Enactment of the Meiji Constitution and the Progression of the Japanese Constitution after the War

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101247465

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The progression of the Japanese Constitution after the war as well as the contents and the process of enacting the Meiji constitution shows how the japanese aggression towards Asia countries is defined in the present constitution system of Japan. The Japanese do not overcome the past history of aggression, failing to abolish the Tenno institution in the Meiji constitution completely, in the present constitution of Japan. Article 9 of the Constitution, a war-renouncing article that is the abnormal system as the price of maintenance of the Tenno institution, makes it harder to overcome the history. These problems turn up as the tendency of regressing to the past Meiji constitution. The inherent contradiction of the Japanese Constitution which is caused by the failure to clear the past history of aggression will appear in the form of the regression if the Article 9 of the Constitution is to be revised and the Tenno institution is maintained. Tenno, who is responsible for the past war of aggression, has the constitutional symbolical status in Japan. Under these circumstances, it is difficult to overcome the past historical wrongs but rather the possibility that The Japanese go back to the past is immanent in the Japanese Constitution
    번역하기

    The progression of the Japanese Constitution after the war as well as the contents and the process of enacting the Meiji constitution shows how the japanese aggression towards Asia countries is defined in the present constitution system of Japan. The ...

    The progression of the Japanese Constitution after the war as well as the contents and the process of enacting the Meiji constitution shows how the japanese aggression towards Asia countries is defined in the present constitution system of Japan. The Japanese do not overcome the past history of aggression, failing to abolish the Tenno institution in the Meiji constitution completely, in the present constitution of Japan. Article 9 of the Constitution, a war-renouncing article that is the abnormal system as the price of maintenance of the Tenno institution, makes it harder to overcome the history. These problems turn up as the tendency of regressing to the past Meiji constitution. The inherent contradiction of the Japanese Constitution which is caused by the failure to clear the past history of aggression will appear in the form of the regression if the Article 9 of the Constitution is to be revised and the Tenno institution is maintained. Tenno, who is responsible for the past war of aggression, has the constitutional symbolical status in Japan. Under these circumstances, it is difficult to overcome the past historical wrongs but rather the possibility that The Japanese go back to the past is immanent in the Japanese Constitution

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼