RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    감사위원회에 관한 연구들의 비판적 고찰 및 제언 = A Critical Review on the Literature about the Audit Committee

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104295876

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Audit committee was first introduced to Korea in 2000 but the history of the audit committee is very long in the other countries. In the U.S., the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) recommended the establishment of the committee since 1940s. In 1977, the NYSE mandated the establishment for all listed companies on the NYSE. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also recommends the establishment of the committee. Blue Ribbon Committee Report(1999) also describes the role of independent and effective audit committee and the responsibility of the committee in details. It is expected that the committee plays an important role in corporate governance structure, especially as a mechanism to enhance corporate financial reporting quality and corporate transparency. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act issued in 2002 also stresses and regulates a stronger role of audit committees.
    Korea is not an exception. In 2000, Korean government required every firms whose asset size greater than 2 trillion Won to establish audit committee, which is composed of at least 3 independent board members. There is a growing literature on audit committee, representing the importance of audit committee in corporate governance structure. However, there has been no study up to now that reviews and summarizes prior studies comprehensively and critically. This study is intended to fill this gap.
    This study critically reviews prior literature on audit committee, published from early 1990s to now. I divide about 50 related articles into five different topics and review them separately. The five topics are:(1) the relation with auditor (e.g., hiring, communicating, compensation, and firing auditors), (2) relation with financial reporting quality (e.g., accrual management, restatement, error correction, regulator enforcement action, and conservatism), (3) relation with other firm characteristics (e.g., market reaction, litigation, and disclosure), (4) relation with board of directors (e.g., the effect of board characteristics on audit committee), and (5) the reason to voluntarily establish the committee (e.g., the comparison between firms establishing audit committee voluntarily and the other firms).
    The most reviewed articles are related to how the establishment or the characteristics of audit committee (independence, expertise or competence, and activity of the audit committee) are related to certain variables.
    The review focuses on research papers published in the world's top accounting journals and also includes relevant Korean studies published in Korean journals. For each topic, I not only review relevant prior literature but also critically comment on them. In addition, I try to provide possible future research topics to help academic researchers. As a result, one may understand past research findings as well as strengths and weakness of them at the same time. Thus, it would be easier for readers to develop a new research idea from reading and understanding this study.
    This paper is expected to be helpful to various parties. For regulators, this paper summarizes past academic findings concisely. Thus, they may depend on this study to get the information on their decision-making process. Academics can also use this paper as a way to learn from past research and develop new related ideas.
    번역하기

    Audit committee was first introduced to Korea in 2000 but the history of the audit committee is very long in the other countries. In the U.S., the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) recommended the establishment of the committee since 1940s. In 1977, the ...

    Audit committee was first introduced to Korea in 2000 but the history of the audit committee is very long in the other countries. In the U.S., the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) recommended the establishment of the committee since 1940s. In 1977, the NYSE mandated the establishment for all listed companies on the NYSE. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also recommends the establishment of the committee. Blue Ribbon Committee Report(1999) also describes the role of independent and effective audit committee and the responsibility of the committee in details. It is expected that the committee plays an important role in corporate governance structure, especially as a mechanism to enhance corporate financial reporting quality and corporate transparency. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act issued in 2002 also stresses and regulates a stronger role of audit committees.
    Korea is not an exception. In 2000, Korean government required every firms whose asset size greater than 2 trillion Won to establish audit committee, which is composed of at least 3 independent board members. There is a growing literature on audit committee, representing the importance of audit committee in corporate governance structure. However, there has been no study up to now that reviews and summarizes prior studies comprehensively and critically. This study is intended to fill this gap.
    This study critically reviews prior literature on audit committee, published from early 1990s to now. I divide about 50 related articles into five different topics and review them separately. The five topics are:(1) the relation with auditor (e.g., hiring, communicating, compensation, and firing auditors), (2) relation with financial reporting quality (e.g., accrual management, restatement, error correction, regulator enforcement action, and conservatism), (3) relation with other firm characteristics (e.g., market reaction, litigation, and disclosure), (4) relation with board of directors (e.g., the effect of board characteristics on audit committee), and (5) the reason to voluntarily establish the committee (e.g., the comparison between firms establishing audit committee voluntarily and the other firms).
    The most reviewed articles are related to how the establishment or the characteristics of audit committee (independence, expertise or competence, and activity of the audit committee) are related to certain variables.
    The review focuses on research papers published in the world's top accounting journals and also includes relevant Korean studies published in Korean journals. For each topic, I not only review relevant prior literature but also critically comment on them. In addition, I try to provide possible future research topics to help academic researchers. As a result, one may understand past research findings as well as strengths and weakness of them at the same time. Thus, it would be easier for readers to develop a new research idea from reading and understanding this study.
    This paper is expected to be helpful to various parties. For regulators, this paper summarizes past academic findings concisely. Thus, they may depend on this study to get the information on their decision-making process. Academics can also use this paper as a way to learn from past research and develop new related ideas.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최정호, "회계정보의 신뢰성 제고를 위한 감사위원회 제도의 도입방안" 103-131, 1999

    2 강희갑, "주식회사의 경영감독․감사 및 감사위원회제도에 관한 연구" 한국상장회사협의회 2002

    3 홍복기, "이사회와 그 위원회-감사위원회 도입 여부에 대한 검토" (39) : 51-71, 1999

    4 최관, "이사회 및 감사위원회의 특성과 회계부정 간의 관계에 관한 실증분석" 한국공인회계사회 48 (48): 351-389, 2008

    5 김건식, "새로운 감독체제의 모색-감사, 사외이사, 감사위원회의 비교를 중심으로" (38) : 103-118, 1998

    6 최종희, "비감사서비스의 제공이 감사인의 독립성에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구들의 비판적 검토 및 제안" 한국산업경영학회 23 (23): 1-44, 2008

    7 이정화, "기업지배구조와 회계정보공시와의 관계에 대한 실증연구" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 33-70, 2005

    8 김주현, "기업의 소유구조와 기업가치의 연관성에 관한 연구" (5) : 129-154, 1992

    9 김우택, "기업가치와 소유경영구조에 관한 실증적연구" (6) : 55-75, 1993

    10 김영숙, "기업가치와 기업소유구조와의 관련성" (26) : 173-197, 2000

    1 최정호, "회계정보의 신뢰성 제고를 위한 감사위원회 제도의 도입방안" 103-131, 1999

    2 강희갑, "주식회사의 경영감독․감사 및 감사위원회제도에 관한 연구" 한국상장회사협의회 2002

    3 홍복기, "이사회와 그 위원회-감사위원회 도입 여부에 대한 검토" (39) : 51-71, 1999

    4 최관, "이사회 및 감사위원회의 특성과 회계부정 간의 관계에 관한 실증분석" 한국공인회계사회 48 (48): 351-389, 2008

    5 김건식, "새로운 감독체제의 모색-감사, 사외이사, 감사위원회의 비교를 중심으로" (38) : 103-118, 1998

    6 최종희, "비감사서비스의 제공이 감사인의 독립성에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구들의 비판적 검토 및 제안" 한국산업경영학회 23 (23): 1-44, 2008

    7 이정화, "기업지배구조와 회계정보공시와의 관계에 대한 실증연구" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 33-70, 2005

    8 김주현, "기업의 소유구조와 기업가치의 연관성에 관한 연구" (5) : 129-154, 1992

    9 김우택, "기업가치와 소유경영구조에 관한 실증적연구" (6) : 55-75, 1993

    10 김영숙, "기업가치와 기업소유구조와의 관련성" (26) : 173-197, 2000

    11 최정호, "감사위원회제도의 효과와 성공적인 정착방안" (41) : 107-123, 2000

    12 손성규, "감사위원회의 효과: 회계오류를 중심으로" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 61-90, 2004

    13 전규안, "감사위원회의 설치와 이익조정사이의 관계" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 143-178, 2004

    14 최정호, "감사위원회와 외부감사인의 선임" 한국공인회계사회 (40) : 2004

    15 정영진, "감사위원회 특성이 감사보수에 미치는 영향" 한국공인회계사회 (41) : 145-166, 2005

    16 조문기, "감사위원회 제도가 이익의 정보효과에 미치는 영향" 한국공인회계사회 (41) : 95-121, 2005

    17 이상철, "감사위원회 도입이 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 143-172, 2003

    18 고대영, "감사위원회 도입과 감사위원회의 독립성이 이익조정 통제에 미치는 영향" 한국공인회계사회 (45) : 69-90, 2007

    19 서정우, "“한국 기업의 감사위원회의 역할과 책임”. 한국공인회계사회 연구용역 중간보고서" 한국공인회계사회 2002

    20 Pincus, K., "Voluntary Formation of Corporate Audit Committee among NASDAQ Firms" 8 (8): 239-265, 1989

    21 Menon, K., "The Use of Audit Committee for Monitoring" 13 (13): 121-139, 1994

    22 Choi, J.-H., "The Role of Audit Committees in Decreasing Earnings Management:Korean Evidence" 1 (1): 37-60, 2004

    23 Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committee, "The Report and Recommendations of Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committee" The New York Stock Exchange and The National Association of Securities Dealers 1999

    24 Beasley, M., "The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee Composition and Experience" 18 (18): 539-570, 2001

    25 Vafeas, N., "The Relationship Between Board Structure and Firm Performance in the UK" 30 : 383-407, 1998

    26 Birkett, B. S., "The Recent History of Corporate Audit Committees" 13 : 109-124, 1986

    27 Bradbury, M., "The Incentives for Voluntary Audit Committee Formation" 9 (9): 19-36, 1990

    28 DeZoort, F. T., "The Effects of Corporate Governance Experience and Financial-Reporting and Audit Knowledge on Audit Committee members' Judgments" 20 (20): 31-47, 2001

    29 Lee, H. Y., "The Effect of Audit Committee and Board of Director Independence on Auditor Resignation" 23 (23): 131-146, 2004

    30 Wild, J. J., "The Audit Committee and Earnings Quality" 11 (11): 247-276, 1996

    31 Kothari, S. P., "Performance Matched Abnormal Accrual Measures" 39 (39): 163-197, 2005

    32 Lennox, C. S., "Opinion Shopping, Audit Firm Dismissals, and Audit Committees. Working Paper" Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 2002

    33 Deli, D. N., "On the Demand for Independent and Active Audit Committees" 6 (6): 427-445, 2000

    34 Kasznik, R, "On the Association Between Voluntary Disclosure and Earnings Management" 37 (37): 57-81, 1999

    35 Davidson, W. N., "Market Reaction to Voluntary Announcements of Audit Committee Appointments:The Effect of Financial Expertise" 23 (23): 279-293, 2004

    36 Naiker, V., "Former Audit Partners on the Audit Committee and Internal Control Deficiencies" 84 (84): 559-587, 2009

    37 Collier, P., "Factors Affecting the Formation of Audit Committees in Major UK Listed Companies" 23 (23): 421-430, 1993

    38 Bedard, J., "Effect of Audit Committee Expertise, Independence, and Activity on Aggressive Earnings Management" 23 (23): 13-35, 2004

    39 Klein, A., "Economic Determinants of Audit Committee Independence" 77 (77): 435-452, 2002

    40 Jones, J. J., "Earnings Management during Import Relief Investigations" 29 (29): 193-228, 1991

    41 Xie, B., "Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Roles of the Board and the Audit Committee" 9 (9): 295-316, 2003

    42 Krishnan, G., "Does the SOX Definition of an Accounting Expert Matter? The Association between Audit Committee Directors' Accounting Expertise and Accounting Conservatism" 25 (25): 827-857, 2008

    43 DeFond, M. L., "Does the Market Value Financial Expertise on Audit Committees of Boards of Directors?" 43 (43): 153-193, 2005

    44 Carcello, J. V., "Disclosures in Audit Committee Charters and Reports" 16 (16): 291-304, 2002

    45 Dechow, P., "Detecting Earnings Management" 70 (70): 193-225, 1995

    46 Levitt, A., "Corporate Governance:Integrity in the Information Age" Speech presented at Tulane University 1998

    47 Cohen, J. G. Karisnamoorthy, "Corporate Governance and the Audit Process" 19 (19): 573-594, 2002

    48 Hoitash, U., "Corporate Governance and Internal Control over Financial Reporting:A Comparison of Regulator Regimes" 84 (84): 839-867, 2009

    49 김정옥, "Corporate Governance and Accounting Conservatism : Evidence from Board and Audit Committee Characteristics" 한국회계학회 32 (32): 89-115, 2007

    50 Eichenseher, J. W., "Corporate Director Liability and Monitoring Preferences" 4 (4): 13-31, 1985

    51 Srinivasan, S, "Consequences of Financial Reporting Failure for Outside Directors:Evidence from Accounting Restatement and Audit Committee Members" 43 (43): 291-334, 2005

    52 Dechow, P., "Causes and Consequences of Earnings Management:An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC" 13 (13): 1-36, 1996

    53 Carcello, J. V., "Board Characteristics and Audit Fees" 19 (19): 365-384, 2002

    54 Cohen, J. R., "Auditors' Consideration of Corporate Governance and Management Control Philosophy in Preplanning and Planning Judgments" 19 (19): 133-146, 2000

    55 Abbott, L., "Auditor Selection and Audit Committee Characteristics" 19 (19): 49-66, 2000

    56 Lennox, C., "Audit Firm Appointment, Board Characteristics, and Audit Firm Alumni" 24 (24): 235-258, 2007

    57 Goh, B. W, "Audit Committees, Board of Directors, and Remediation of Material Weakness in Internal Control" 26 (26): 549-579, 2009

    58 Vafeas, N, "Audit Committee, Board, and the Quality of Reported Earnings" 22 (22): 1093-1122, 2005

    59 Klein, A., "Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management" 33 (33): 375-400, 2002

    60 Chen, K., "Audit Committee, Board Characteristics, and Audit Switch Decisions by Andersen's Clients" 24 (24): 1085-1117, 2007

    61 Zhang, Y., "Audit Committee Quality, Auditor Independence and Internal Control Weakness" 26 (26): 300-327, 2007

    62 Krishnan, J, "Audit Committee Quality and Internal Control:An Empirical Analysis" 80 (80): 649-675, 2005

    63 McMullen, D., "Audit Committee Performance:An Investigation of the Consequence Associated with Audit Committee" 15 (15): 87-103, 1996

    64 Archambeault, D., "Audit Committee Incentive Compensation and Accounting Restatement" 25 (25): 965-992, 2008

    65 Krishnan, J., "Audit Committee Financial Expertise, Litigation Risk, and Corporate Governance" 28 (28): 241-261, 2009

    66 Kalbers, L. P., "Audit Committee Effectiveness:An Empirical Investigation of the Contribution of Power" 12 (12): 24-49, 1993

    67 Scarborough D. P., "Audit Committee Composition and Interaction with Internal Auditing:Canadian Evidence" 12 (12): 51-62, 1998

    68 Carcello, J. V., "Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting" 75 (75): 453-468, 2000

    69 Engel, E., "Audit Committee Compensation and the Demand for Monitoring of the Financial Reporting Process" 49 (49): 136-154, 2010

    70 Abbott, L., "Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements" 23 (23): 69-87, 2004

    71 Carcello, J. V., "Audit Committee Characteristics and Auditor Dismissals following "New" Going-Concern Reports" 78 (78): 95-117, 2003

    72 Collier, P., "Audit Committee Activity and Agency Costs" 18 (18): 311-332, 1999

    73 Abbott, L., "An Empirical Investigation of Audit Fees, Nonaudit Fees, and Audit Committees" 20 (20): 215-234, 2003

    74 Beasley, M., "An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud" 71 (71): 443-465, 1996

    75 DeZoort, F. T., "An Analysis of Experience Effects on Audit Committee Members' Oversight Judgments" 23 (23): 1-22, 1998

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.23 1.23 1.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.29 1.2 2.08 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼