자연재해의 불확실성과 위험회피정책 - 자연자원의 은닉가치 보전에 초점을 두고 : 자연재해의 불확실성과 위험회피정책 = Policy for Risk Evasion of Natural Calamities - Focused on Preservation of Concealed Value in Natural Resources -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

1. CONTENTS
(1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
To practice a policy on risk avoidance for Natural calamities, it, the national institutions, constitutions, rules, urban planning and technology should be used. Furthermore, it is essential to analyze the regional environments and reflect the their characteristics. This is because they are the mechanism for causing the natural calamities as well as a means of conveying the damage and they affect on the regional topography, precipitation, temperature and gradient.
(2) RESEARCH METHOD
book research, second date analysis
(3) RESEARCH RESULTS
For flood, the heavy rain is the main cause but it do not damage us by itself. Instead, rainwater causes the damage to us by changing waterway or overflowing in the process of pushing it out into the sea via rivers. Therefore, we can minimize the damage of flood through analyzing the cause of overflow or the change of waterway and providing the proper prescription.
We have a tendency to consider the current values of natural resources as valuable and to overlook their concealed ones. However, the latter can mediate the uncertainty and support the potential energy. The damage of natural calamities, such as flood, can be minimized when the potential resources are preserved.
2. RESULTS
Natural calamities can recover the role of natural resource and can restore their concealed values. When we use their positive effects. This is called a policy on risk avoidance through preserving the concealed value of natural resources. It is a strategy for minimizing the damage in human being through solving the problems of natural phenomena. In this policy, two preconditions are required for natural calamities; 1) their current values that provide the direct benefits to us should be regarded as precious, 2) their concealed values should not be removed with preservation as the natural state.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• ABSTRACT
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 자연재해 대응정책에 관한 이론적 고찰
• Ⅲ. 풍수해와 위험회피정책의 실제
• Ⅳ. 풍수해의 대안적 위험회피정책
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 參考文獻

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "홍수재해의 원인분석과 복구대책" 강릉경실련 124-, 2002

2 "한국인의 위험인지와 정책적 함의" 한국행정학회 29 (29): 23-, 1995

3 "한국의 재난관리정책 목표체계와 효과성 연구" 한국국정관리학회 13 (13): 49-12, 2003

4 "충남지방의 재해발생 현황 원인과 대책" 충청남도 13-17, 2000

5 "지방자치단체의 자연재해관리정책과 인위재난관리정책비교연구 : AHP기법을 이용한 상대적 중요도 및 우선순위 측정을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 36 (36): 165-185, 2002

6 "재해의 발생실태 및 유형별 사례" ^대한지방행정공제회 44 : 40-, 1995

7 "재해관리 행정체계의 국가간 비교 연구 미국과 한국의 사례를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 957-, 1995

8 "재난의 유형과 재난관리 : 신문 사설 내용분석" 한국행정학회 30 (30): 51-, 1996

9 "재난관리체계의 효과성 평가에 관한 연구 : 공무원 주민의 의식수준을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 1997

10 "자연재해의 종류와 발생원인" 1979

11 "자연재해의 대응정책과 자연자원 관리방안 : 강릉지역의 수해를 중심으로" 국토연구원 39 : 35-50, 2003

12 "자연재해대책 개선방향 : 풍수해를 중심으로" 국토연구원 258 (258): 16-, 2003

13 "우리나라 현행 재난관리의 문제점과 개선방안" 대한지방행정공제회 44 : 1995

14 "민원을 통해서 본 강릉시 수해복구의 문제점" 한국지역개발학회 2002

15 "미국재해관리시스템의 변천과정" 국토연구원 93-, 2003

16 "돌발사고에 대한 위험대비행정의 분석" 한국행정학회 1989

17 "도시재난사고의 예방단계에서 정부조직학습 삼풍백화점 붕괴사고사례를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 29 (29): 1995

18 "경상남도 수자원재해관리를 위한 자연재해현황과 피해특성조사" 한국환경과학회 14 (14): 621-627, 2005

19 "강원도 재해특성과 방재정책" 강원발전연구원 6-, 2004

20 "가뭄재해 극복을 위한 구조적·비구조적 대책" 지방행정연구원 10 (10): 1995

21 "This is a PR ; The Reality of Public Relations" Beimont Wadswort Publishing 1989

22 "The Disaster Resistant And Quality-of-Life Community" 13 : 2000

23 "Societal Response to Hazards and Major Hazard Events" 1985

24 "Six saying about adaptationism" Oxford Univ Press 177-, 1998

25 "Searching for Safety" Aaron 1988

26 "Human System Responses to Disaster An Inventory of Sociological Findings" 37-42, 1986

27 "Handbook of Public Administration" Jossey-Bass Publishers 1990

28 "Governmental Response to Disasters The Conflict Between Bureaucratic Procedures and Emergent Norms" 1992

29 "Ferment at FEMA" 1994

30 "Escalating in a Quagmire: The Changing Dynamics of the Emergency Management Policy Subsystem" 56 (56): 1996

31 "Community Response to Disaster" SAGE Publications Inc 17-47, 1978

32 "A Challenge for Public Administration" 1985