RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Challenges of light post-editing : Based on an English-to-Korean MTPE module

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110059023

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study explores the challenges associated with light post-editing (LPE) in translation practice and training. It first reviews existing definitions and guidelines for both full and light post-editing, alongside previous research on the difficulties posed by LPE. Building on this foundation, three rounds of small-scale experiments were conducted within an action research framework to generate empirical insights and inform pedagogical recommendations. The findings highlight fundamental differences between full and light post-editing, revealing that transitioning to LPE remains highly challenging and that vague guidelines hinder students from consistently meeting its requirements. The study highlights the need for targeted interventions, such as clearer guidelines and gradual transition planning, when opting for light post-editing training. It also argues that, given LPE’s reliance on outdated assumptions, the rigid ‘light versus full’ dichotomy should be replaced with a more flexible, context-driven approach.
      번역하기

      This study explores the challenges associated with light post-editing (LPE) in translation practice and training. It first reviews existing definitions and guidelines for both full and light post-editing, alongside previous research on the difficultie...

      This study explores the challenges associated with light post-editing (LPE) in translation practice and training. It first reviews existing definitions and guidelines for both full and light post-editing, alongside previous research on the difficulties posed by LPE. Building on this foundation, three rounds of small-scale experiments were conducted within an action research framework to generate empirical insights and inform pedagogical recommendations. The findings highlight fundamental differences between full and light post-editing, revealing that transitioning to LPE remains highly challenging and that vague guidelines hinder students from consistently meeting its requirements. The study highlights the need for targeted interventions, such as clearer guidelines and gradual transition planning, when opting for light post-editing training. It also argues that, given LPE’s reliance on outdated assumptions, the rigid ‘light versus full’ dichotomy should be replaced with a more flexible, context-driven approach.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • I. Introduction
      • II. Literature review
      • 1. Rethinking light post-editing: its definition, ambiguity and practical challenges
      • 2. Understudied nature of light post-editing: training method, risks and evolution
      • Abstract
      • I. Introduction
      • II. Literature review
      • 1. Rethinking light post-editing: its definition, ambiguity and practical challenges
      • 2. Understudied nature of light post-editing: training method, risks and evolution
      • III. Settings and Design
      • IV. Analysis and discussion
      • 1. Experiment 1: Full post-editing comparison
      • 2. Experiment 2: Full post-editing and light post-editing comparison
      • 3. Reflection and Improvement
      • 4. Outcome of revised training
      • V. Conclusion
      • References
      • Appendix
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼