RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    교부들의 요한계시록 주석 평가: 빅토리누스와 오이쿠메니우스를 중심으로 = An Evaluation on Church Fathers’ Commentaries on the Book of Revelation: Focused on Victorinus and Oecemenius

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107972110

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Jerome rated Victorious of Pettau(d. 304) as the first theologian to use Latin for biblical exegesis. The significance of Victorinus in the study of Revelation is the fact that he left the oldest commentary on the Revelation which remains. However, there is rare study that has analyzed and evaluated the entire commentary of Victorinus’s Revelation, or compared it in detail with the commentaries of Tyconius another Latin Father in the 4th century, and Oecumenius and Andreas Greek Fathers in the 6th century. This article first introduces and evaluates the commentaries of the Latin Fathers Victorious and Tyconius, and then introduces and evaluates the commentaries of the Greek Fathers Oecumenius and Andreas. After analyzing the commonalities of the four fathers, the differences are evaluated focusing on Victorious and Oecumenius whose commentaries are available till now. Finally, an application for a proper commentary on Revelation is suggested.
    번역하기

    Jerome rated Victorious of Pettau(d. 304) as the first theologian to use Latin for biblical exegesis. The significance of Victorinus in the study of Revelation is the fact that he left the oldest commentary on the Revelation which remains. However, th...

    Jerome rated Victorious of Pettau(d. 304) as the first theologian to use Latin for biblical exegesis. The significance of Victorinus in the study of Revelation is the fact that he left the oldest commentary on the Revelation which remains. However, there is rare study that has analyzed and evaluated the entire commentary of Victorinus’s Revelation, or compared it in detail with the commentaries of Tyconius another Latin Father in the 4th century, and Oecumenius and Andreas Greek Fathers in the 6th century. This article first introduces and evaluates the commentaries of the Latin Fathers Victorious and Tyconius, and then introduces and evaluates the commentaries of the Greek Fathers Oecumenius and Andreas. After analyzing the commonalities of the four fathers, the differences are evaluated focusing on Victorious and Oecumenius whose commentaries are available till now. Finally, an application for a proper commentary on Revelation is suggested.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 웨인리치, W. C., "교부들의 성경해석: 요한묵시록" 분도출판사 2010

    2 "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victorinus_of_Pettau"

    3 Armstrong, J. J., "Victorinus of Pettau as the Author of the Canon Muratori" 62 : 1-34, 2008

    4 Steinhauser, K. B., "The Structure of Tyconius’ Apocalypse Commentary: A Correction" 35 (35): 354-357, 1981

    5 Gieschen, C. A., "The Relevance of the Homologoumena and Antilegomena Distinction for the New Testament Canon Today: Revelation as a Test Case" 79 : 279-300, 2015

    6 Lamoreux, J. C., "The Provenance of Ecumenius’ Commentary on the Apocalypse" 52 : 88-108, 1998

    7 Bruce, F. F., "The Earliest Latin Commentary on the Apocalypse" 10 (10): 352-366, 1938

    8 Fox, J. C., "The Earliest French Apocalypse and Commentary" 7 : 445-468, 1912

    9 DuRousseau, C. H., "The Commentary of Oecumenius on the Apocalypse of John: A Lost Chapter in the History of Interpretation" 29 : 21-34, 1984

    10 Wojciechowski, M., "Exegetical Method in Oecumenius’ Commentary on Revelation" 36 (36): 205-215, 2019

    1 웨인리치, W. C., "교부들의 성경해석: 요한묵시록" 분도출판사 2010

    2 "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victorinus_of_Pettau"

    3 Armstrong, J. J., "Victorinus of Pettau as the Author of the Canon Muratori" 62 : 1-34, 2008

    4 Steinhauser, K. B., "The Structure of Tyconius’ Apocalypse Commentary: A Correction" 35 (35): 354-357, 1981

    5 Gieschen, C. A., "The Relevance of the Homologoumena and Antilegomena Distinction for the New Testament Canon Today: Revelation as a Test Case" 79 : 279-300, 2015

    6 Lamoreux, J. C., "The Provenance of Ecumenius’ Commentary on the Apocalypse" 52 : 88-108, 1998

    7 Bruce, F. F., "The Earliest Latin Commentary on the Apocalypse" 10 (10): 352-366, 1938

    8 Fox, J. C., "The Earliest French Apocalypse and Commentary" 7 : 445-468, 1912

    9 DuRousseau, C. H., "The Commentary of Oecumenius on the Apocalypse of John: A Lost Chapter in the History of Interpretation" 29 : 21-34, 1984

    10 Wojciechowski, M., "Exegetical Method in Oecumenius’ Commentary on Revelation" 36 (36): 205-215, 2019

    11 Kelly, J. F. T., "Early Medieval Evidence for Twelve Homilies by Origen on the Apocalypse" 39 : 273-279, 1985

    12 De Groote, M., "Die Literatur der Kirchenväter im Apokalypsekommentar des Oecumenius" 7 (7): 251-262, 2003

    13 Oecumenius, "Commentary on the Apocalypse" Catholic University of America Press 2006

    14 Victorinus, "Commentary on the Apocalypse"

    15 "CSB Ancient Faith Study Bible" Holman Bible Publishers 2019

    16 Frederiksen, P., "Apocalypse and Redemption in Early Christianity from John of Patmos to Augustine of Hippo" 45 : 151-173, 1991

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-11-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 신학연구원 -> ACTS 신학연구소
    영문명 : Asia United Theological University -> ACTS Theology Institute
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0 0 0
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0 0 0 0.04
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼