RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      패턴구성에 따른 RPNN의 음성인식 성능비교 = Speech Recognition Capacity Comparision of RPNN by Pattern Composition

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2006680

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this paper, we use th RPNN as a non-linear predictor according to the time variation of a speech without an alignment procedure. We perform the recognition experiment of Korean 100 syllables based on RPNN
      In the experiment, we compare the recognition rates, by increasing the prediction order and the number of hidden(recursive) units, and by composing the pattern. When the prediction order is 3-rd order and the hidden units are 10 units, the recognition rates show better result than others. And when we compose the pattern as the method 2, they are far improved than the method 1.
      In the method 1, the highest recognition rate is 82.40% at the 4-th prediction order and the 10 hidden units. And in the method 2, it is 84.90% at the 3-rd prediction order and the 10hidden units, and it is improved at 2.50% than the method 1

      번역하기

      In this paper, we use th RPNN as a non-linear predictor according to the time variation of a speech without an alignment procedure. We perform the recognition experiment of Korean 100 syllables based on RPNN In the experiment, we compare the recogni...

      In this paper, we use th RPNN as a non-linear predictor according to the time variation of a speech without an alignment procedure. We perform the recognition experiment of Korean 100 syllables based on RPNN
      In the experiment, we compare the recognition rates, by increasing the prediction order and the number of hidden(recursive) units, and by composing the pattern. When the prediction order is 3-rd order and the hidden units are 10 units, the recognition rates show better result than others. And when we compose the pattern as the method 2, they are far improved than the method 1.
      In the method 1, the highest recognition rate is 82.40% at the 4-th prediction order and the 10 hidden units. And in the method 2, it is 84.90% at the 3-rd prediction order and the 10hidden units, and it is improved at 2.50% than the method 1

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼