RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Remifentanil과 Lidocaine이 Sevoflurane 마취유도 시기관내삽관에 필요한 흡입시간에 미치는 영향 = The effect of remifentanil and lidocaine on time interval acquired for successful tracheal intubation in inhalational induction using sevoflurane

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104350767

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: This study was conducted to investigate the optimal time interval for tracheal intubation and the effect of adjuvant drugs such as remifentanil and lidocaine during induction and tracheal intubation using sevoflurane inhalation without muscle relaxant.
      Methods: This study enrolled patients with the age of 20−60 years old and ASA 1 or 2. Patients were randomly assigned into one of 4 groups (S, SR, SRL, SL), in which they were given remifentanil (R) i.v. at a rate of 0.25μg/kg/min, or lidocaine (L) i.v. bolus of 1.5 mg/kg during sevoflurane inhalation (S). Anesthesia was performed as inhalation induction 2 minutes after pre-filling with sevoflurane 8 vol%. The time interval between induction and tracheal intubation was determined using up-and-down method. When satisfied all of the categories of response to tracheal intubation, the case was assigned to ‘success', otherwise ‘fail'. In each groups, effective time for successful intubation in 50% (ET50) and 95% (ET95) were calculated by probit analysis.
      Results: ET50 was 3.90 minutes (95% confidence interval 3.32−4.38) in group S, 3.18 minutes (2.92−3.48) in group SL, 2.83 minutes (2.47−3.07) in group SR, and 2.68 minutes (2.37−2.95) in group SRL. In group S, SL, SR, and SRL, ET95 was 4.52 minutes (4.17−7.95), 3.63 minutes (3.37−4.97), 3.30 minutes (3.06−4.64), and 3.12 minutes (2.89−4.42), respectively.
      Conclusions: The optimal time to intubate successfully using sevoflurane without muscle relaxant in 95% patients was 4.5 minutes. The optimal time is reduced to 3.1 minutes by coadministration of remifentanil and lidocaine.
      번역하기

      Background: This study was conducted to investigate the optimal time interval for tracheal intubation and the effect of adjuvant drugs such as remifentanil and lidocaine during induction and tracheal intubation using sevoflurane inhalation without mu...

      Background: This study was conducted to investigate the optimal time interval for tracheal intubation and the effect of adjuvant drugs such as remifentanil and lidocaine during induction and tracheal intubation using sevoflurane inhalation without muscle relaxant.
      Methods: This study enrolled patients with the age of 20−60 years old and ASA 1 or 2. Patients were randomly assigned into one of 4 groups (S, SR, SRL, SL), in which they were given remifentanil (R) i.v. at a rate of 0.25μg/kg/min, or lidocaine (L) i.v. bolus of 1.5 mg/kg during sevoflurane inhalation (S). Anesthesia was performed as inhalation induction 2 minutes after pre-filling with sevoflurane 8 vol%. The time interval between induction and tracheal intubation was determined using up-and-down method. When satisfied all of the categories of response to tracheal intubation, the case was assigned to ‘success', otherwise ‘fail'. In each groups, effective time for successful intubation in 50% (ET50) and 95% (ET95) were calculated by probit analysis.
      Results: ET50 was 3.90 minutes (95% confidence interval 3.32−4.38) in group S, 3.18 minutes (2.92−3.48) in group SL, 2.83 minutes (2.47−3.07) in group SR, and 2.68 minutes (2.37−2.95) in group SRL. In group S, SL, SR, and SRL, ET95 was 4.52 minutes (4.17−7.95), 3.63 minutes (3.37−4.97), 3.30 minutes (3.06−4.64), and 3.12 minutes (2.89−4.42), respectively.
      Conclusions: The optimal time to intubate successfully using sevoflurane without muscle relaxant in 95% patients was 4.5 minutes. The optimal time is reduced to 3.1 minutes by coadministration of remifentanil and lidocaine.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: This study was conducted to investigate the optimal time interval for tracheal intubation and the effect of adjuvant drugs such as remifentanil and lidocaine during induction and tracheal intubation using sevoflurane inhalation without muscle relaxant.
      Methods: This study enrolled patients with the age of 20−60 years old and ASA 1 or 2. Patients were randomly assigned into one of 4 groups (S, SR, SRL, SL), in which they were given remifentanil (R) i.v. at a rate of 0.25μg/kg/min, or lidocaine (L) i.v. bolus of 1.5 mg/kg during sevoflurane inhalation (S). Anesthesia was performed as inhalation induction 2 minutes after pre-filling with sevoflurane 8 vol%. The time interval between induction and tracheal intubation was determined using up-and-down method. When satisfied all of the categories of response to tracheal intubation, the case was assigned to ‘success', otherwise ‘fail'. In each groups, effective time for successful intubation in 50% (ET50) and 95% (ET95) were calculated by probit analysis.
      Results: ET50 was 3.90 minutes (95% confidence interval 3.32−4.38) in group S, 3.18 minutes (2.92−3.48) in group SL, 2.83 minutes (2.47−3.07) in group SR, and 2.68 minutes (2.37−2.95) in group SRL. In group S, SL, SR, and SRL, ET95 was 4.52 minutes (4.17−7.95), 3.63 minutes (3.37−4.97), 3.30 minutes (3.06−4.64), and 3.12 minutes (2.89−4.42), respectively.
      Conclusions: The optimal time to intubate successfully using sevoflurane without muscle relaxant in 95% patients was 4.5 minutes. The optimal time is reduced to 3.1 minutes by coadministration of remifentanil and lidocaine.
      번역하기

      Background: This study was conducted to investigate the optimal time interval for tracheal intubation and the effect of adjuvant drugs such as remifentanil and lidocaine during induction and tracheal intubation using sevoflurane inhalation without mu...

      Background: This study was conducted to investigate the optimal time interval for tracheal intubation and the effect of adjuvant drugs such as remifentanil and lidocaine during induction and tracheal intubation using sevoflurane inhalation without muscle relaxant.
      Methods: This study enrolled patients with the age of 20−60 years old and ASA 1 or 2. Patients were randomly assigned into one of 4 groups (S, SR, SRL, SL), in which they were given remifentanil (R) i.v. at a rate of 0.25μg/kg/min, or lidocaine (L) i.v. bolus of 1.5 mg/kg during sevoflurane inhalation (S). Anesthesia was performed as inhalation induction 2 minutes after pre-filling with sevoflurane 8 vol%. The time interval between induction and tracheal intubation was determined using up-and-down method. When satisfied all of the categories of response to tracheal intubation, the case was assigned to ‘success', otherwise ‘fail'. In each groups, effective time for successful intubation in 50% (ET50) and 95% (ET95) were calculated by probit analysis.
      Results: ET50 was 3.90 minutes (95% confidence interval 3.32−4.38) in group S, 3.18 minutes (2.92−3.48) in group SL, 2.83 minutes (2.47−3.07) in group SR, and 2.68 minutes (2.37−2.95) in group SRL. In group S, SL, SR, and SRL, ET95 was 4.52 minutes (4.17−7.95), 3.63 minutes (3.37−4.97), 3.30 minutes (3.06−4.64), and 3.12 minutes (2.89−4.42), respectively.
      Conclusions: The optimal time to intubate successfully using sevoflurane without muscle relaxant in 95% patients was 4.5 minutes. The optimal time is reduced to 3.1 minutes by coadministration of remifentanil and lidocaine.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김종엽, "외래 수술을 받는 소아에서 Sevoflurane을 이용 흡입마취유도 및 유지: 경비 기관내삽관 조건평가와 Dexamethasone의 효과" 대한마취과학회 48 (48): 520-525, 2005

      2 Politis GD, "intubation of healthy pediatric patients without muscle relaxant: a survey of technique utilitzation and perceptions of safety" 88 : 737-741, 1999

      3 Jellish WS, "The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients" 82 : 479-785, 1996

      4 Smith I, "Sevoflurane-a long-awaited volatile anaesthetic" 76 : 435-445, 1996

      5 최수주, "Sevoflurane-N2O-O2을 이용한 Vital Capacity Rapid Inhalation Induction 후 근이완제 정주없이 시행한 기관 내 삽관에 대한 반응: Propofol-N2O-O2-Vecuronium 사용 경우와 비교" 대한마취과학회 44 (44): 431-439, 2003

      6 Joo HS, "Sevoflurane with remifentanil allows rapid tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blocking agents" 48 : 646-650, 2001

      7 Egan TD, "Remifentanil versus alfentanil: comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adult male volunteers" 84 : 821-833, 1996

      8 권재영, "Lidocaine 및 Fentanyl의 전처치가 Sevoflurane을이용한 마취유도와 기관내 삽관에 미치는 효과" 대한마취과학회 48 (48): 349-353, 2005

      9 Kim WY, "Lidocaine dose not prevent bispectral index increases in response to endotracheal intubation" 102 : 156-159, 2006

      10 Yurino M, "Induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen: a comparison of spontaneous ventilation and vital capacity rapid inhalation induction (VCRII) techniques" 76 : 598-601, 1993

      1 김종엽, "외래 수술을 받는 소아에서 Sevoflurane을 이용 흡입마취유도 및 유지: 경비 기관내삽관 조건평가와 Dexamethasone의 효과" 대한마취과학회 48 (48): 520-525, 2005

      2 Politis GD, "intubation of healthy pediatric patients without muscle relaxant: a survey of technique utilitzation and perceptions of safety" 88 : 737-741, 1999

      3 Jellish WS, "The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients" 82 : 479-785, 1996

      4 Smith I, "Sevoflurane-a long-awaited volatile anaesthetic" 76 : 435-445, 1996

      5 최수주, "Sevoflurane-N2O-O2을 이용한 Vital Capacity Rapid Inhalation Induction 후 근이완제 정주없이 시행한 기관 내 삽관에 대한 반응: Propofol-N2O-O2-Vecuronium 사용 경우와 비교" 대한마취과학회 44 (44): 431-439, 2003

      6 Joo HS, "Sevoflurane with remifentanil allows rapid tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blocking agents" 48 : 646-650, 2001

      7 Egan TD, "Remifentanil versus alfentanil: comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adult male volunteers" 84 : 821-833, 1996

      8 권재영, "Lidocaine 및 Fentanyl의 전처치가 Sevoflurane을이용한 마취유도와 기관내 삽관에 미치는 효과" 대한마취과학회 48 (48): 349-353, 2005

      9 Kim WY, "Lidocaine dose not prevent bispectral index increases in response to endotracheal intubation" 102 : 156-159, 2006

      10 Yurino M, "Induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen: a comparison of spontaneous ventilation and vital capacity rapid inhalation induction (VCRII) techniques" 76 : 598-601, 1993

      11 Muzi M, "Induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation with sevoflurane in adults" 85 : 536-543, 1996

      12 Viby-Mogensen J, "Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents" 40 : 59-74, 1996

      13 Kindler CH, "Effects of intravnous lidocaine and/or esmolol on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: a double-blind, controlled clinical trial" 8 : 491-496, 1996

      14 Nishino T, "Effects of IV lidocaine on airway reflexes elicited by irritation of the tracheal mucosa in humans anaesthetized with enflurane" 64 : 682-687, 1990

      15 Cros AM, "Determination of sevoflurane alveolar concentration for tracheal intubation with remifentanil, and no muscle relaxant" 55 : 965-969, 2000

      16 Kimura T, "Determination of end-tidal sevoflurane concentration for tracheal intubation and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration in adults" 79 : 378-381, 1994

      17 Melan TP Jr, "Cardiovascular effects of sevoflurane compared with those of isoflurane in volunteers" 83 : 918-928, 1995

      18 Stoelting RK, "Basics of Anesthesia. 4th" 76-77, 2000

      19 The Korean Society of Anesthesiologist, "Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine" Yumoonkak Publishing Inc 151-152, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼