『세기와 더불어』에 서술된 북한 민족해방운동사 인식의 변화상과 함의 = Narrated in With The Century, The Meaning and Change on Awareness About History of North Korea’s National Liberation Movement

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

North Korea’s self-justification is needed for realization of North Korea’s change.
As North Korean political system is also inevitable change, decision of change only rest on North Korea. So It is important to confronting and interpreting their history. AS perception on present and future is not alter unless changing viewpoint on the past, it is essential to new interpretaion on their history for searching new way and modifying past policy.
In this way, Kim Il Song’s memoir With The Century has many important meanings. From the this book, there is possible of having different interpretaions on various version. This book can cause basis on flexible action for changing of North Korae if it sounds paradoxical. In other words, awareness of history restricted by the Juche ideology can makes new representation by authority on Kim Il Song.
With The Century has three features.
First, This book narrates history of North Korea’s national liberation movement on the view of national united front and reinterpretes nationalism. The reason is connected on change of policy toward South Korea. North Korea have nothing to do but carry out the policy on the defensive instead of last policy on the viewpoint of the ‘united front ’ because of attaining their goals of survival strategy of political system. With a view to embracing change of policy toward South Korea, The North Korea justify enhancing relations of South Korea by the means of nationalism.
Second, This book has new point of view about different group of communist who were judged by communalism. The reason is likely that North Korea want interpret political system’s change as historical inheritance by embracing different groups of Kim Il Song. In fact, Thinking of group criticized of communalsim by Kim Il Song sheds new light.
Third, The relation of North Korea, China and the Soviet Union is described realistically. Especially, this book criticizes the Soviet Union intensively but don’t criticize China’s case directly. This description reflects the North Korea’s condition which is urgently needed of support of other country after the post-cold war era. The North Korea’s historical group is going to be change after With The Century. History Science, revised edition of History of the liberation combat against Japan, The History of Korean LabourParty in 2004 has showed flexible historical recognition. This change is important in implying possiblity of interation with South Korea historical recognization. It seems to be so weakly ‘outgrowth’ but the meaning of ‘outgrowth’ is new sign. The change of new sign can take root in the ground of peace and coexistence between North Korea and South Korea only by continuous managing and concerning.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 장세윤, "해방 직후 북한학계의민족해방운동사 인식과 편찬*－조선력사편찬위원회 간행 「조선민족해방투쟁사」의 검토－" 고려사학회 (18) : 201-245, 2004

2 안동일, "평양 애국열사릉에는 누가 묻혔는가" (가을) : 1991

3 신주백, "진실에 더욱 다가선 김일성회고록" 청명문화재단 2 : 1999

4 사회과학출판사, "주체사상의 사회역사원리" 백산서당 1989

5 "조선전사" 과학·백과사전출판사 1980

6 정영철, "조선로동당의 역사학" 선인 2008

7 과학원 력사연구소, "조선근대혁명운동사" 과학원출판사 1962

8 역사문제연구소 민족해방운동사 연구반, "쟁점과 과제 민족해방운동사" 역사비평사 1990

9 "인민"

10 김일성, "세기와 더불어" 조선로동당출판사 1994

11 이종석, "새로 쓴 현대북한의 이해" 역사비평사 2000

12 안병우, "북한의 한국사인식" 한길사 1990

13 한국역사연구회 북한사학사연구반, "북한의 역사만들기" 푸른역사 2003

14 辛珠柏, "북한의 근현대사 연구에서 반침략투쟁사" 한국근현대사학회 21 : 213-244, 2002

15 서동만, "북한 체제와 민족주의" 역사문제연구소 4 : 2000

16 와다 하루끼, "북조선" 돌베개 2002

17 서동만, "북조선사회주의체제성립사(1945~1961)" 선인 2005

18 "로동신문"

19 "력사과학"

20 김연철, "냉전기 통일론 극복과 탈냉전시대의 새 패러다임" 역사비평사 (가을) : 1998

21 한홍구, "남북의 독립운동사 연구의 과제와 전망" (17) : 2001

22 장세윤, "남·북한의 항일무장투쟁에 대한 역사인식" (17) : 2001

23 오동렬, "나를 말한다" 1994

24 "근로자"

25 최창익, "朝鮮民族解放鬪爭史" 朝鮮歷史編纂委員會 1949

26 康成銀, "朝鮮學校での朝鮮史敎科書の見直しと變化" (662) : 2003

27 姜萬吉, "分斷時代의 歷史認識" 創作과 批評社 1978

28 역사문제연구소, "1950년대 남북한의 선택과 굴절" 1998