RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인도네시아 파푸아의 산림자원과 미래: 환경자원의 개발과 딜레마 = Indonesia Papua`s Forest Resource and It`s Future: Environment Resource`s Development and Dilemmas

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101802383

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This research focuses on Papua Indonesia, a region where natural resources are abundant. However, poor local development and the lack of effective planning and execution have prevented the rich resources from being fully utilized. The development in Papua Indonesia needs proper construction of infra facilities which based on the environment and social factors. Large capital and advance technology is a must in the process but problems have been surfacing throughout the whole process. Despite the various difficulties, Indonesia state government is still making effort trying to develop the region and thus this has instead turned into a dilemma to the local government. This research focuses on the dilemmas and the future of Papua`s future development. The future of Papua depends largely on its natural resources. This research is divided into a few categories: the necessity and the factors of proper development, present situation of Papua forest resources, the policies made by the central government and the state government, the development of the resources and its dilemmas, and the future of Papua. Despite the rich natural resources that Papua holds, the management of human resource development regarding the local people has never been carried out effectively. As a result, not only that the local people and the government could not receive any kinds of benefits from the resources, but they also suffers from the feeling of loss economically. Hence, there is a need to develop the resources for the benefits of the local people. Efforts have been carrying out from time to time but the dilemmas resulted from the development has always been a problem. Besides, those dilemmas also affect activities like logging, mining of minerals, and the construction of infrastructures. National interest versus forest development, regional development project and the increase of local population, development versus the destruction of nature environment are just a few examples of the dilemmas to be considered. The future of Papua is directly connected to its natural resources. The central government and the state government should put serious consideration on range and the period of the development. Also, the local people should be educated and be informed about the development of the region. On the other hand, developers who are involved in the project shall come out with a plan to minimize the damage to the environment and increase the infrastructures around the area to improve the living of the local people. By doing this, not only the dilemmas could be overcome, but a better future for both Papua and future generation can be ensured.
      번역하기

      This research focuses on Papua Indonesia, a region where natural resources are abundant. However, poor local development and the lack of effective planning and execution have prevented the rich resources from being fully utilized. The development in P...

      This research focuses on Papua Indonesia, a region where natural resources are abundant. However, poor local development and the lack of effective planning and execution have prevented the rich resources from being fully utilized. The development in Papua Indonesia needs proper construction of infra facilities which based on the environment and social factors. Large capital and advance technology is a must in the process but problems have been surfacing throughout the whole process. Despite the various difficulties, Indonesia state government is still making effort trying to develop the region and thus this has instead turned into a dilemma to the local government. This research focuses on the dilemmas and the future of Papua`s future development. The future of Papua depends largely on its natural resources. This research is divided into a few categories: the necessity and the factors of proper development, present situation of Papua forest resources, the policies made by the central government and the state government, the development of the resources and its dilemmas, and the future of Papua. Despite the rich natural resources that Papua holds, the management of human resource development regarding the local people has never been carried out effectively. As a result, not only that the local people and the government could not receive any kinds of benefits from the resources, but they also suffers from the feeling of loss economically. Hence, there is a need to develop the resources for the benefits of the local people. Efforts have been carrying out from time to time but the dilemmas resulted from the development has always been a problem. Besides, those dilemmas also affect activities like logging, mining of minerals, and the construction of infrastructures. National interest versus forest development, regional development project and the increase of local population, development versus the destruction of nature environment are just a few examples of the dilemmas to be considered. The future of Papua is directly connected to its natural resources. The central government and the state government should put serious consideration on range and the period of the development. Also, the local people should be educated and be informed about the development of the region. On the other hand, developers who are involved in the project shall come out with a plan to minimize the damage to the environment and increase the infrastructures around the area to improve the living of the local people. By doing this, not only the dilemmas could be overcome, but a better future for both Papua and future generation can be ensured.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 강영순, "인도네시아 환경정치에 대한 연구: 열대림을 중심으로" 한국아시아학회 17 (17): 1-44, 2014

      2 Kementerian Kehutanan, "Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18Tahun 2013 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan"

      3 Soepijanto, Bambang, "Terobosan Atasi Sulitnya Mantapkan Kawasan Hutan"

      4 Pemerintah Provinsi Papua, "Sumber Daya Alam Provinsi Papua" Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia 2010

      5 Supriyadi, Herman, "Strategi Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian di Papua Barat" 6 (6): 2-13, 2008

      6 Direktorat Pengukuhan Penatagunaan, dan Tenurial Kawasan Hutan, "Statistik Bidang Planologi Tahun 2012"

      7 Sekretariat Keadilan, "Returnees from Papua New Guinea to Irian Jaya" (3) : 1999

      8 Direktorat Perencanaan Kawasan Hutan, "Rencana Kehutanan Tingkat Nasional (RKTN) Tahun 2011-2030" Direktorat Jenderal Planologi Kehutanan-Kementerian Kehutanan 8-20, 2011

      9 Kementerian Kehutanan, "Perkembangan Izin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan untuk Pertambangan"

      10 Kementerian Kehutanan, "Perkembangan Izin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan untuk Non Pertambangan"

      1 강영순, "인도네시아 환경정치에 대한 연구: 열대림을 중심으로" 한국아시아학회 17 (17): 1-44, 2014

      2 Kementerian Kehutanan, "Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18Tahun 2013 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan"

      3 Soepijanto, Bambang, "Terobosan Atasi Sulitnya Mantapkan Kawasan Hutan"

      4 Pemerintah Provinsi Papua, "Sumber Daya Alam Provinsi Papua" Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia 2010

      5 Supriyadi, Herman, "Strategi Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian di Papua Barat" 6 (6): 2-13, 2008

      6 Direktorat Pengukuhan Penatagunaan, dan Tenurial Kawasan Hutan, "Statistik Bidang Planologi Tahun 2012"

      7 Sekretariat Keadilan, "Returnees from Papua New Guinea to Irian Jaya" (3) : 1999

      8 Direktorat Perencanaan Kawasan Hutan, "Rencana Kehutanan Tingkat Nasional (RKTN) Tahun 2011-2030" Direktorat Jenderal Planologi Kehutanan-Kementerian Kehutanan 8-20, 2011

      9 Kementerian Kehutanan, "Perkembangan Izin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan untuk Pertambangan"

      10 Kementerian Kehutanan, "Perkembangan Izin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan untuk Non Pertambangan"

      11 Kementerian Kehutanan, "Perkembangan Izin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan untuk Non Pertambangan"

      12 Badan Pusat Statistik Papua, "Perkembangan Ekspor Dan Impor Provinsi Papua Bulan Agustus 2015"

      13 Forest Peoples Programme, "Papua dan Papua Barat: REDD+ dan ancaman terhadap masyarakat adat"

      14 Purwanto, Wawan H., "Papua 100 Tahun ke Depan" CMB Press 2010

      15 Koentjaraningrat, "Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia (ke-20)" Djambatan 2004

      16 Flassy, Angela, "Luka Papua: HIV, Otonomi Khusus, dan Perang Suku" Spasi & VHR Book 2008

      17 Badan Pusat Statistik, "Luas Kawasan Hutan dan Perairan” Menurut Provinsi (ribu ha)"

      18 Pusat Hubungan Masyarakat Kementrian Kehutanan, "Kehutanan Indonesia" Kementerian Kehutanan 1-3, 2011

      19 F. H. Runaweri,, "Kebutuhan Penelitian Kehutanan (Research Needs) di Tanah Papua" Dinas Kehutanan dan Perkebunan Provinsi Papua Barat 2013

      20 Sekretariat Kabinet RI, "Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2011 tentang Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru dan Penyempurnaan Tata Kelola Hutan Alam Primer dan Lahan Gambut" Deputi Bidang Perekonomian

      21 Sekretariat Kabinet RI, "Inpres Nomor 8 Tahun 2015"

      22 Center for Public Relations the Ministry of Forestry, "Indonesian Forestry Development: Sustainable Forest for the Prosperous Justice Society"

      23 Hendryo, Bambang, "Hutan Indonesia Paru-paru Dunia" Verbum 2013

      24 Carolyn Marr, "Eksploitasi sumber daya alam di Papua selama 22 tahun dengan pendekatan dari atas ke bawah"

      25 Sekretariat Keadilan, "Dampak Kehadiran Aparat Keamanan bagi Situasi Kemasyarakatan dan HAM di Wilayah Pegunungan Bintang Tahun 1998- awal 1999" (5) : 1999

      26 Kementerian Kehutanan, "Daftar penolakan permohonan IUPHHK-HTI di Kawasan PIPIB s/d Bulan September 2014"

      27 Kementerian Kehutanan, "Daftar Penundaan Permohonan IUPHHK-HA Baru pada Areal PIPPIB sesuai dengan Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2013 tentang Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru dan Penyempurnaan Tata Kelola Hutan Alam Primer dan Lahan Gambut Periode Bulan Mei 2011 sampai dengan Bulan September 2014"

      28 Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua Barat, "Daftar Industri Primer Pemegang Ijin Usaha Pemanfaatan Hasil Hutan Kayu (IUPHHK)Berdasarkan Jatah Produksi Tahunan menurut Kabupaten/Kota Tahun 2010 - 2012" Dinas Kehutanan dan Perkebunan Provinsi Papua Barat

      29 Jarvie, James, "Conflict Timber: Dimensions of the Problem in Asia and Africa. Vol. II" ARD 22-77, 2003

      30 Badan Pusat Statistik Papua, "Berita Resmi Statistik Provinsi Papua No.43/10/94/Th. XVII"

      31 Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua Barat, "Banyaknya Usaha Sektor Pertambangan dan Penggalian Menurut Kabupaten/Kota Tahun 2009-2010" Dinas Pertambangan dan Energi Provinsi Papua Barat

      32 Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua Barat, "Banyaknya Industri Kecil Kimia, Agro, dan Hasil Hutan menurut Kabupaten/Kota Tahun 2008-2010" Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Provinsi Papua Barat

      33 Pemerintah Provinsi Papua, "Badan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan Hidup" Jayapura 2012

      34 Sekretariat Keadilan, "Aspirasi Merdeka Masyarakat Tanah Papua dan Perjuangan Demokrasi Bangsa Indoensia" (6) : 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.29 0.29 0.24
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.2 0.18 0.308 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼