RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      군 영창제도의 문제점과 개선방안 = The Problems and Improvement Plan for Military Guardhouse System

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      With respect to the guardhouse disposition which has been regulated from the time of enactment of the 「Military Personnel Management Act」(No. 1006 of the Law) on January 20, 1962, many problems have been pointed out in terms of improvement of human rights in the armed forces and supplementation work for the aforementioned is being made. First of all, through the revision of the 「Military Personnel Management Act」on April 28, 2006, specification of causes for disciplinary action on servicepersons that were comprehensively regulated, enhancement of guardhouse disposition for prevention of abuse of guardhouse disposition, introduction of military judicial officer system in charge of human rights for examining legality of guardhouse disposition의 legality, introduction of notice system for guardhouse disposition for relatives of prisoners and granting force for suspension of execution at the time of appealing against guardhouse disposition have been supplemented. And for the purpose of regulating matters necessary for disciplinary action on servicepersons in accordance with regulations from Article 56 through 61 of the「Military Personnel Management Act」, the 「Ordinance on the Disciplinary Action against Servicepersons」has been enacted and enforced from August 22, 2007, and Namok of Item 1 of Article 2 of the 「Enforcement Regulations of the Ordinance on the Disciplinary Action against Servicepersons」which was enacted on November 22, 2007 is concretely regulating detailed standards for weighing of disciplinary action against soldiers in its annex. And the 「Instructions on the Standards for Guardhouse Execution and Treatment of Prisoners in Guardhouse」has also been enacted and executed from February 14, 2011 to guarantee legality of guardhouse disposition and human rights of prisoners in the execution process of guardhouse by regulating standards and procedure of treatment for prisoners. Notwithstanding such improvement and efforts, however, problems of guardhouse disposition have continued to be raised and examples include violation of warrant requirement which is guaranteed in the Constitution in the terms of detaining without a warrant from a judge, violation of the principle of prohibition on cumulative penalties in the way that the period of detention in a guardhouse is not included in the term of military service, violation of the principle of statutory reservation in the way that installation of guardhouse is not based on the law and violation of the principle of proportionality in terms of detaining prisoners in a same place with convicts as well as pretrial detainees providing inferior treatment. Based on such a discussible situation, this manuscript analyzes the reality focusing on the present conditions and procedures of military guardhouse disposition, and aims to analyze problems focusing on the violation of warrant requirement, violation of due process and violation of equality based on the foregoing, and will finish discussion proposing lightning abolition of guardhouse disposition and suggesting a plan for diversification of disciplinary actions.
      번역하기

      With respect to the guardhouse disposition which has been regulated from the time of enactment of the 「Military Personnel Management Act」(No. 1006 of the Law) on January 20, 1962, many problems have been pointed out in terms of improvement of huma...

      With respect to the guardhouse disposition which has been regulated from the time of enactment of the 「Military Personnel Management Act」(No. 1006 of the Law) on January 20, 1962, many problems have been pointed out in terms of improvement of human rights in the armed forces and supplementation work for the aforementioned is being made. First of all, through the revision of the 「Military Personnel Management Act」on April 28, 2006, specification of causes for disciplinary action on servicepersons that were comprehensively regulated, enhancement of guardhouse disposition for prevention of abuse of guardhouse disposition, introduction of military judicial officer system in charge of human rights for examining legality of guardhouse disposition의 legality, introduction of notice system for guardhouse disposition for relatives of prisoners and granting force for suspension of execution at the time of appealing against guardhouse disposition have been supplemented. And for the purpose of regulating matters necessary for disciplinary action on servicepersons in accordance with regulations from Article 56 through 61 of the「Military Personnel Management Act」, the 「Ordinance on the Disciplinary Action against Servicepersons」has been enacted and enforced from August 22, 2007, and Namok of Item 1 of Article 2 of the 「Enforcement Regulations of the Ordinance on the Disciplinary Action against Servicepersons」which was enacted on November 22, 2007 is concretely regulating detailed standards for weighing of disciplinary action against soldiers in its annex. And the 「Instructions on the Standards for Guardhouse Execution and Treatment of Prisoners in Guardhouse」has also been enacted and executed from February 14, 2011 to guarantee legality of guardhouse disposition and human rights of prisoners in the execution process of guardhouse by regulating standards and procedure of treatment for prisoners. Notwithstanding such improvement and efforts, however, problems of guardhouse disposition have continued to be raised and examples include violation of warrant requirement which is guaranteed in the Constitution in the terms of detaining without a warrant from a judge, violation of the principle of prohibition on cumulative penalties in the way that the period of detention in a guardhouse is not included in the term of military service, violation of the principle of statutory reservation in the way that installation of guardhouse is not based on the law and violation of the principle of proportionality in terms of detaining prisoners in a same place with convicts as well as pretrial detainees providing inferior treatment. Based on such a discussible situation, this manuscript analyzes the reality focusing on the present conditions and procedures of military guardhouse disposition, and aims to analyze problems focusing on the violation of warrant requirement, violation of due process and violation of equality based on the foregoing, and will finish discussion proposing lightning abolition of guardhouse disposition and suggesting a plan for diversification of disciplinary actions.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이세주, "헌법판례연구 제14권" 한국헌법판례연구학회 2013

      2 이세주, "징계처분에 의한 인신구속의 헌법적 검토" 한국헌법학회 18 (18): 375-403, 2012

      3 송광섭, "징계영창처분의 문제점과 인권개선방안" 한국피해자학회 12 (12): 95-116, 2004

      4 윤성철, "전투경찰대원 징계영창제도에 관한 연구" 경찰대학 8 (8): 59-85, 2008

      5 임태훈, "영창처벌에 대한 현황과 사례로 보는 문제점과 개선방향, 영창제도 개선 토론회 자료집"

      6 박종형, "영창제도의 필요성과 효과, 그리고 개선지점에 대하여, 영창제도 개선토론회 자료집"

      7 오동석, "영창제도의 문제점과 개선방향, 영창제도 개선 토론회 자료집"

      8 김선수, "영창제도, 폐지가 올바른 길(正道), 영창제도 개선 토론회 자료집"

      9 최정학, "군영창제도의 법적 문제점" 서울대학교 BK21 법학연구단 공익인권법센터 1 (1): 2004

      10 진선태, "군무종사자에 대한 징계제도에 관한 연구 –영창제도를 중심으로" 충남대학교 2015

      1 이세주, "헌법판례연구 제14권" 한국헌법판례연구학회 2013

      2 이세주, "징계처분에 의한 인신구속의 헌법적 검토" 한국헌법학회 18 (18): 375-403, 2012

      3 송광섭, "징계영창처분의 문제점과 인권개선방안" 한국피해자학회 12 (12): 95-116, 2004

      4 윤성철, "전투경찰대원 징계영창제도에 관한 연구" 경찰대학 8 (8): 59-85, 2008

      5 임태훈, "영창처벌에 대한 현황과 사례로 보는 문제점과 개선방향, 영창제도 개선 토론회 자료집"

      6 박종형, "영창제도의 필요성과 효과, 그리고 개선지점에 대하여, 영창제도 개선토론회 자료집"

      7 오동석, "영창제도의 문제점과 개선방향, 영창제도 개선 토론회 자료집"

      8 김선수, "영창제도, 폐지가 올바른 길(正道), 영창제도 개선 토론회 자료집"

      9 최정학, "군영창제도의 법적 문제점" 서울대학교 BK21 법학연구단 공익인권법센터 1 (1): 2004

      10 진선태, "군무종사자에 대한 징계제도에 관한 연구 –영창제도를 중심으로" 충남대학교 2015

      11 남선모, "군(軍) 영창제도의 개선에 관한 고찰" 한국법학회 16 (16): 115-135, 2016

      12 이만종, "군 징계 영창제도 개선에 대한 법적고찰" 한국경찰연구학회 8 (8): 123-140, 2009

      13 국가인권위원회, "군 징계 영창제도 개선방안 토론회 자료집"

      14 형혁규, "군 영창제도의 쟁점과 개선방안" 국회입법조사처 2013

      15 신양균, "군 영창제도에 대한 검토" 법과사회이론학회 (45) : 123-152, 2013

      16 이계수, "군 수사와 사법제도 현황 및 개선방안 연구, 2015년도 인권상황 실태조사 연구용역보고서" 국가인권위원회 2015

      17 송광섭, "군 수사과정 및 군 영창 인권상황 실태조사, 2003년도 인권상황 실태조사 연구용역보고서" 국가인권위원회 2004

      18 정인섭, "「시민적 및 정치적 권리에 관한 국제규약」과 군장병 인권" 법학연구소 48 (48): 35-62, 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-10-27 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of hongik law review KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.59 0.59 0.61
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.6 0.59 0.693 0.42
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼