RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Differentiation and Categorization of Strategies: From Cases in Asia

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106837323

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The word ‘strategy’ has been widely used, but poorly defined, in the IR area. Establishing a clear definition of the term is a precondition for effective policy-making and academic research. Hence, this article aims to build a systematic framework for analyzing strategy. Based on different perception of orders, goals, and policy instruments, this paper categorizes IR strategies into five types, including revisionist, engagement, status quo, accommodative and bandwagon, providing a systematic perspective for future studies in analyzing strategy. Examples of strategies taken by actors for dealing with Asian orders are given to elucidate the characteristics of each strategy type. The comparison on various strategies of conflict and cooperation outlines the current Asian order.
      번역하기

      The word ‘strategy’ has been widely used, but poorly defined, in the IR area. Establishing a clear definition of the term is a precondition for effective policy-making and academic research. Hence, this article aims to build a systematic framework...

      The word ‘strategy’ has been widely used, but poorly defined, in the IR area. Establishing a clear definition of the term is a precondition for effective policy-making and academic research. Hence, this article aims to build a systematic framework for analyzing strategy. Based on different perception of orders, goals, and policy instruments, this paper categorizes IR strategies into five types, including revisionist, engagement, status quo, accommodative and bandwagon, providing a systematic perspective for future studies in analyzing strategy. Examples of strategies taken by actors for dealing with Asian orders are given to elucidate the characteristics of each strategy type. The comparison on various strategies of conflict and cooperation outlines the current Asian order.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Xiang, L., "Washington’s Misguided China Policy" 43 (43): 7-24, 2001

      2 Mintzberg, H., "The Strategy Concept I : Five Ps for Strategy" 30 (30): 11-24, 1987

      3 Swedberg, R., "The Paradigm of Economic Sociology" 16 (16): 169-213, 1987

      4 Renato Cruz De Castro, "The Obama Administration’s Strategic Pivot to Asia: From a Diplomatic to a Strategic Constrainment of an Emergent China?" 한국국방연구원 25 (25): 331-349, 2013

      5 Fargo, T., "The Military Side of Strategic Rebalancing" 14 (14): 26-30, 2012

      6 Mearsheimer, J. J., "The Gathering Storm : China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia" 3 (3): 381-396, 2010

      7 Kaya, A., "The EU’s China Problem : A Battle over Norms" 51 (51): 214-233, 2014

      8 Hax, A. C., "The Concept of Strategy and the Strategy Formation Process" 18 (18): 99-109, 1988

      9 Mearsheimer, J. J., "The Case for Offshore Balancing : A Superior US Grand Stategy" 95 : 70-, 2016

      10 Jackson, B. P., "The 'Soft War' for Europe’s East" 137 : 3-, 2006

      1 Xiang, L., "Washington’s Misguided China Policy" 43 (43): 7-24, 2001

      2 Mintzberg, H., "The Strategy Concept I : Five Ps for Strategy" 30 (30): 11-24, 1987

      3 Swedberg, R., "The Paradigm of Economic Sociology" 16 (16): 169-213, 1987

      4 Renato Cruz De Castro, "The Obama Administration’s Strategic Pivot to Asia: From a Diplomatic to a Strategic Constrainment of an Emergent China?" 한국국방연구원 25 (25): 331-349, 2013

      5 Fargo, T., "The Military Side of Strategic Rebalancing" 14 (14): 26-30, 2012

      6 Mearsheimer, J. J., "The Gathering Storm : China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia" 3 (3): 381-396, 2010

      7 Kaya, A., "The EU’s China Problem : A Battle over Norms" 51 (51): 214-233, 2014

      8 Hax, A. C., "The Concept of Strategy and the Strategy Formation Process" 18 (18): 99-109, 1988

      9 Mearsheimer, J. J., "The Case for Offshore Balancing : A Superior US Grand Stategy" 95 : 70-, 2016

      10 Jackson, B. P., "The 'Soft War' for Europe’s East" 137 : 3-, 2006

      11 Kwak, N., "Talking Politics and Engaging Politics : An Examination of the Interactive Relationships between Structural Features of Political Talk and Discussion Engagement" 32 (32): 87-111, 2005

      12 Mintzberg, H., "Strategy Formation : Schools of Thought" 1968 : 105-235, 1990

      13 Venkatraman, N., "Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises : The Construct, Dimensionality, and Measurement" 35 (35): 942-962, 1989

      14 Nye, J., "Soft Power" 80 : 153-171, 1990

      15 Whittington, R., "Putting Giddens into Action : Social Systems and Managerial Agency" 29 (29): 693-712, 1992

      16 Miles, R. E., "Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process" 3 (3): 546-562, 1978

      17 Hannan, M. T., "Inertia, Density and the Structure of Organizational Populations : Entries in European Automobile Industries 1886-1981" 18 (18): 193-228, 1997

      18 Granovetter, M., "Economic Action and Social Structure : The Problem of Embeddedness" 91 (91): 481-510, 1985

      19 Whitley, R. D., "Eastern Asian Enterprise Structures and the Comparative Analysis of Forms of Business Organization" 11 (11): 47-74, 1990

      20 Shambaugh, D., "China Engages Asia : Reshaping the Regional Order" 29 (29): 64-99, 2004

      21 Gupta, Y. P., "Business Strategy, Manufacturing Flexibility, and Organizational Performance Relationships : A Path Analysis Approach" 5 (5): 204-233, 1996

      22 Schweller, R. L., "Bandwagoning for Profit : Bringing the Revisionist State back in" 19 (19): 72-107, 1994

      23 Williamson, O. E, ""Strategizing, Economizing, and Economic Organization" 75-94, 1991

      24 Indyk, M. S., ""Scoring Obama’s Foreign Policy : A Progressive Pragmatist Tries to Bend History" 29-43, 2012

      25 Cyert, R. M., ""Organizational Factors in the Theory of Oligopoly" 44-64, 1956

      26 Nye, J, ""Get Smart : Combining Hard and Soft Power" 160-163, 2009

      27 Resnick, E, ""Defining Engagement" 551-566, 2001

      28 Womack, B, ""China and Southeast Asia : Asymmetry, Leadership and Normalcy" 529-548, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
      2021-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼