RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SSCI SCOPUS KCI등재

      Great Expectations: Washington, Beijing, and the North Korean Nuclear Crisis = Great Expectations: Washington, Beijing, and the North Korean Nuclear Crisis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99943966

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Throughout the North Korean nuclear crisis, the Bush administration has believed that China is the most crucial player in the effort to find a solution. Washington has frequently expressed disappointment that Beijing is not willing to put more pressure on its misbehaving client. China faces a dilemma, however. Although most evidence indicates that Chinese leaders are not happy about Pyongyang`s quest for nuclear weapons, keeping the Korean peninsula nonnuclear is not China`s highest priority. Beijing is even more concerned about preserving North Korea as a geographic buffer between the U.S. sphere of influence in Northeast Asia and the Chinese homeland. China does have substantial economic leverage over North Korea, since it supplies a major portion of the country`s food and energy supplies. The PRC is cautious, however, about using that leverage to coerce Pyongyang regarding the nuclear issue. Chinese leaders fear that putting too much pressure on Kim Jong Il`s regime could cause the North Korean state to unravel, leading to massive refugee flows into China and the emergence of a united Korea allied to the United States. The latter development would put American military forces in a country directly on the border of the PRC, something that Chinese officials would consider highly undesirable. Washington needs to be more realistic about China`s willingness to put pressure on Pyongyang. Beijing will try to be helpful on the nuclear problem, as it has been already, but China sees itself as an intermediary in the crisis, not as a U.S. partner in a campaign to coerce North Korea. Given Washington`s high expectations and China`s ongoing caution, the potential exists for serious misunderstandings and significant damage to the U.S.-PRC relationship.
      번역하기

      Throughout the North Korean nuclear crisis, the Bush administration has believed that China is the most crucial player in the effort to find a solution. Washington has frequently expressed disappointment that Beijing is not willing to put more pressur...

      Throughout the North Korean nuclear crisis, the Bush administration has believed that China is the most crucial player in the effort to find a solution. Washington has frequently expressed disappointment that Beijing is not willing to put more pressure on its misbehaving client. China faces a dilemma, however. Although most evidence indicates that Chinese leaders are not happy about Pyongyang`s quest for nuclear weapons, keeping the Korean peninsula nonnuclear is not China`s highest priority. Beijing is even more concerned about preserving North Korea as a geographic buffer between the U.S. sphere of influence in Northeast Asia and the Chinese homeland. China does have substantial economic leverage over North Korea, since it supplies a major portion of the country`s food and energy supplies. The PRC is cautious, however, about using that leverage to coerce Pyongyang regarding the nuclear issue. Chinese leaders fear that putting too much pressure on Kim Jong Il`s regime could cause the North Korean state to unravel, leading to massive refugee flows into China and the emergence of a united Korea allied to the United States. The latter development would put American military forces in a country directly on the border of the PRC, something that Chinese officials would consider highly undesirable. Washington needs to be more realistic about China`s willingness to put pressure on Pyongyang. Beijing will try to be helpful on the nuclear problem, as it has been already, but China sees itself as an intermediary in the crisis, not as a U.S. partner in a campaign to coerce North Korea. Given Washington`s high expectations and China`s ongoing caution, the potential exists for serious misunderstandings and significant damage to the U.S.-PRC relationship.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-06-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : The Korea Journal of Defense Analysis -> The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 SSCI 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.42
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.33 0.28 0.564 0.25
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼