RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      THE JAPANESE MODEL OF MODERNIZATION  :  (PRESENT AND FUTURE)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=E806742

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Since 1945, the United States has been the dominant technological power in the world. With other major industries left in ruins by the destruction of World War Ⅱ, American industrial productive capacity provided the major means and resource fer reconstructuring from the devastations in the world. But by the nineteen seventies, the American industrial plant was considerably older than those of West Germany or of Japan, losing part of its competitive edge as American productive performance declined. The Japanese industrial plant underwent far more drastic structural changes than either the American or European capital equipment. In industry after industry the Japanese expanded capacity, improved productivity, and then used their economic capability to penetrate and saturate markets. The Japanese strategy of economic activity prevented capital equipment from aging to the same degree as the American industrial plant, but by the late nineteen seventies, many Japanese industries had been compelled to contract sharply as the rapid expansion of their industry came to an end. The Japanese high risk strategy of economic development has resulted in the elimination of capacity in some industries, has been costly to the Japanese economy and will require a restructuring of Japanese institutions to accommodate the shrinkage of its agricultural employment, to meet the needs of disadvantaged groups such as women, and to adapt to the changing values of the successor generation, the one born since the war, as it gains access to power in the government and in the private sector. The future of the Japanese economy seems to rely mere do social and cultural factors than on economic ones, in the same way that the success of the economic performance of the last thirty years generates from Japanese culture and society and not from its technology, which is imported from the West although perfected in Japan.
      The Japanese people, living on crowded islands, lead a precarious life despite external signs of economic vigor. Japan must rely on imports for much of foodstuffs, and in 1978, was dependent on foreign sources for 86.3% of its energy requirements, The economic success of Japan cannot be attributed to abundance of resources as has been said about the American economy, nor to geography. The history of Japan fails to yield a tradition which extolled merchants or businessmen and might have been expected to produce the current state of modernization. An inquiry of the Japanese success must probe for cultural and social factors, which in the face of great odds have produced the contemporary Japanese economic state. Numerous studies exist on Japanese industry and modernization, but the scholarship in these fields leaves a gap between Japanese industry and economy on one hand, and culture and social systems on the other. In this paper, the cultural base of the Japanese industry and its modernization are explored.
      번역하기

      Since 1945, the United States has been the dominant technological power in the world. With other major industries left in ruins by the destruction of World War Ⅱ, American industrial productive capacity provided the major means and resource fer reco...

      Since 1945, the United States has been the dominant technological power in the world. With other major industries left in ruins by the destruction of World War Ⅱ, American industrial productive capacity provided the major means and resource fer reconstructuring from the devastations in the world. But by the nineteen seventies, the American industrial plant was considerably older than those of West Germany or of Japan, losing part of its competitive edge as American productive performance declined. The Japanese industrial plant underwent far more drastic structural changes than either the American or European capital equipment. In industry after industry the Japanese expanded capacity, improved productivity, and then used their economic capability to penetrate and saturate markets. The Japanese strategy of economic activity prevented capital equipment from aging to the same degree as the American industrial plant, but by the late nineteen seventies, many Japanese industries had been compelled to contract sharply as the rapid expansion of their industry came to an end. The Japanese high risk strategy of economic development has resulted in the elimination of capacity in some industries, has been costly to the Japanese economy and will require a restructuring of Japanese institutions to accommodate the shrinkage of its agricultural employment, to meet the needs of disadvantaged groups such as women, and to adapt to the changing values of the successor generation, the one born since the war, as it gains access to power in the government and in the private sector. The future of the Japanese economy seems to rely mere do social and cultural factors than on economic ones, in the same way that the success of the economic performance of the last thirty years generates from Japanese culture and society and not from its technology, which is imported from the West although perfected in Japan.
      The Japanese people, living on crowded islands, lead a precarious life despite external signs of economic vigor. Japan must rely on imports for much of foodstuffs, and in 1978, was dependent on foreign sources for 86.3% of its energy requirements, The economic success of Japan cannot be attributed to abundance of resources as has been said about the American economy, nor to geography. The history of Japan fails to yield a tradition which extolled merchants or businessmen and might have been expected to produce the current state of modernization. An inquiry of the Japanese success must probe for cultural and social factors, which in the face of great odds have produced the contemporary Japanese economic state. Numerous studies exist on Japanese industry and modernization, but the scholarship in these fields leaves a gap between Japanese industry and economy on one hand, and culture and social systems on the other. In this paper, the cultural base of the Japanese industry and its modernization are explored.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Introduction
      • Deep Culture and Japanese Modernization
      • 1. The Center of Gravity of Japanese Deep Culture
      • 2. Distinctive Influences of Japanese Deep Culture: Man and Nature
      • 3. Social Relativism
      • Introduction
      • Deep Culture and Japanese Modernization
      • 1. The Center of Gravity of Japanese Deep Culture
      • 2. Distinctive Influences of Japanese Deep Culture: Man and Nature
      • 3. Social Relativism
      • 4. Japanese Management
      • 5. Japanese Social Systems
      • 6. Prospects for the Future
      • ·REFERENCES
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼