A Computed Tomography-Based Spatial Normalization for the Analysis of [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography of the Brain

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: We developed a new computed tomography (CT)-based spatial normalization method and CT template to demonstrate its usefulness in spatial normalization of positron emission tomography (PET) images with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET studies in healthy controls.
Materials and Methods: Seventy healthy controls underwent brain CT scan (120 KeV, 180 mAs, and 3 mm of thickness) and [18F] FDG PET scans using a PET/CT scanner. T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images were acquired for all subjects. By averaging skull-stripped and spatially-normalized MR and CT images, we created skull-stripped MR and CT templates for spatial normalization. The skull-stripped MR and CT images were spatially normalized to each structural template. PET images were spatially normalized by applying spatial transformation parameters to normalize skull-stripped MR and CT images. A conventional perfusion PET template was used for PET-based spatial normalization. Regional standardized uptake values (SUV) measured by overlaying the template volume of interest (VOI) were compared to those measured with FreeSurfer-generated VOI (FSVOI).
Results: All three spatial normalization methods underestimated regional SUV values by 0.3–20% compared to those measured with FSVOI. The CT-based method showed slightly greater underestimation bias. Regional SUV values derived from all three spatial normalization methods were correlated significantly (p < 0.0001) with those measured with FSVOI.
Conclusion: CT-based spatial normalization may be an alternative method for structure-based spatial normalization of [18F] FDG PET when MR imaging is unavailable. Therefore, it is useful for PET/CT studies with various radiotracers whose uptake is expected to be limited to specific brain regions or highly variable within study population.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Folstein MF, "“Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician" 12 : 189-198, 1975

2 Fischl B, "Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain" 33 : 341-355, 2002

3 Solomon J, "User-friendly software for the analysis of brain lesions (ABLe)" 86 : 245-254, 2007

4 Thomas BA, "The importance of appropriate partial volume correction for PET quantification in Alzheimer’s disease" 38 : 1104-1119, 2011

5 Acosta-Cabronero J, "The impact of skull-stripping and radio-frequency bias correction on grey-matter segmentation for voxel-based morphometry" 39 : 1654-1665, 2008

6 Fischmeister FP, "The benefits of skull stripping in the normalization of clinical fMRI data" 3 : 369-380, 2013

7 Yasuno F, "Template-based method for multiple volumes of interest of human brain PET images" 16 (16): 577-586, 2002

8 Fein G, "Statistical parametric mapping of brain morphology: sensitivity is dramatically increased by using brain-extracted images as inputs" 30 : 1187-1195, 2006

9 Ashburner J, "Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions" 7 : 254-266, 1999

10 Gispert JD, "Influence of the normalization template on the outcome of statistical parametric mapping of PET scans" 19 : 601-612, 2003

11 Kreisl WC, "In vivo radioligand binding to translocator protein correlates with severity of Alzheimer’s disease" 136 (136): 2228-2238, 2013

12 Kuhn FP, "Comparison of PET template-based and MRI-based image processing in the quantitative analysis of C11-raclopride PET" 4 : 7-, 2014

13 Fischl B, "Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex" 14 : 11-22, 2004

14 Desikan RS, "An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest" 31 : 968-980, 2006

15 Rorden C, "Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization" 61 : 957-965, 2012