RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    TV 토론에서 '발언권 주고 빼앗기'의 담화 분석 = Discourse Analysis of 'Giving' and 'Taking' Floor in Korean TV Debate

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76196753

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research aims at examining the occurrence frequencies and manifested aspects of floors (speech rights) exchanged between a coordinator and discussants, which are one of the important constituents of discussion This motivation leads to analyzing some transcribed material of real discussions on television First, the characteristics of discussion are comparatively examined with respect to other types of discourse, and the structure in which a coordinator, discussants, and audience give and take floors is reviewed. Then after the structure is divided into four types, such as direct giving. indirect giving. direct taking. and indirect taking. their respective modes of manifestation are examined through the analysis of real discourse material. By putting the occurrences of giving and taking floors as well as the number of a coordinator's floors into analysis, the real progression of discussion is evaluated. Thus the present research, I think, w ill serve as a basis for evaluating both the discussion progression and clarifying the discussion structure helpful to desirable discussion.
    번역하기

    This research aims at examining the occurrence frequencies and manifested aspects of floors (speech rights) exchanged between a coordinator and discussants, which are one of the important constituents of discussion This motivation leads to analyzing s...

    This research aims at examining the occurrence frequencies and manifested aspects of floors (speech rights) exchanged between a coordinator and discussants, which are one of the important constituents of discussion This motivation leads to analyzing some transcribed material of real discussions on television First, the characteristics of discussion are comparatively examined with respect to other types of discourse, and the structure in which a coordinator, discussants, and audience give and take floors is reviewed. Then after the structure is divided into four types, such as direct giving. indirect giving. direct taking. and indirect taking. their respective modes of manifestation are examined through the analysis of real discourse material. By putting the occurrences of giving and taking floors as well as the number of a coordinator's floors into analysis, the real progression of discussion is evaluated. Thus the present research, I think, w ill serve as a basis for evaluating both the discussion progression and clarifying the discussion structure helpful to desirable discussion.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 들머리
    • 2. 연구 자료
    • 3. 발언권 주기
    • 4. 발언권 빼앗기
    • 5. 토론자 발언시간과 횟수
    • 1. 들머리
    • 2. 연구 자료
    • 3. 발언권 주기
    • 4. 발언권 빼앗기
    • 5. 토론자 발언시간과 횟수
    • 6. 마무리
    • 참고 문헌
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼