RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      표준화 사업의 경제성 분석 모형 및 이론 체계

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100260996

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      There is no generally accepted single stylized methodology for the impact assessment of standardization programs even though some scholars in the United States or Europe have been trying to set up a common methodology during past decades. It is because the economic outcome indicators that analysts seek to quantify vary significantly with the diversity and complexity of the affected industry and the analytic approach, as well as the nature of STANDARDIZATION programs.
      This paper builds up the model to establish common methodology which is designed to enable the comparable economic assessment analysis between various STANDARDIZATION programs. The model thus serves to enable a comparable impact assessment because it enables both universally valid and stylized analysis, while traditional impact assessment analysis can vary depending on the kinds of analytic approaches. In other words, this paper developed the common methodology which is designed to stylize the universally valid impact assessment of STANDARDIZATION programs. In addition, this paper shows that it should be accompanied by empirical research for some items in the model, to enable the realization of the both comparable and sophisticated analysis of impact assessments, thereby outputting in the range of those values which depend on the industry and/or STANDARDIZATION type.
      번역하기

      There is no generally accepted single stylized methodology for the impact assessment of standardization programs even though some scholars in the United States or Europe have been trying to set up a common methodology during past decades. It is becaus...

      There is no generally accepted single stylized methodology for the impact assessment of standardization programs even though some scholars in the United States or Europe have been trying to set up a common methodology during past decades. It is because the economic outcome indicators that analysts seek to quantify vary significantly with the diversity and complexity of the affected industry and the analytic approach, as well as the nature of STANDARDIZATION programs.
      This paper builds up the model to establish common methodology which is designed to enable the comparable economic assessment analysis between various STANDARDIZATION programs. The model thus serves to enable a comparable impact assessment because it enables both universally valid and stylized analysis, while traditional impact assessment analysis can vary depending on the kinds of analytic approaches. In other words, this paper developed the common methodology which is designed to stylize the universally valid impact assessment of STANDARDIZATION programs. In addition, this paper shows that it should be accompanied by empirical research for some items in the model, to enable the realization of the both comparable and sophisticated analysis of impact assessments, thereby outputting in the range of those values which depend on the industry and/or STANDARDIZATION type.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 표준화의 경제 가치 모형
      • 3. 성과 지표와 비교가능성을 실현하기 위한 해결 방안
      • 4. 결론
      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 표준화의 경제 가치 모형
      • 3. 성과 지표와 비교가능성을 실현하기 위한 해결 방안
      • 4. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Jeanne Powell, "Toward a Standard Benefit-Cost Methodology for Publicly Funded Science and Technology Programs" 2006

      2 Knut, B., "The Influence of Innovation and Standardization on the Macroeconomic Development in Germany" Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, project financed by the German Institute for Standardization and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Technology 2000

      3 Blind, Knut, "The Economics of Standards:Theory, Evidence, Policy" Edward Elgar 2004

      4 AFNOR, "The Economic Impact of Standardization:TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE" STANDARDS GROWTH IN FRANCE 2009

      5 Tassey, G, "Standardization in Technology-Based Markets" 29 (29): 587-602, 2000

      6 Tassey, G., "Modeling and Measuring the Economic Roles of Technology Infrastructure" National Institute of Standards and Technology 17 (17): 2008

      7 Tassey, G., "Methods for assessing the economic impacts of government R&D" National Institute of Standards and Technology 19-, 2003

      8 GPRA, "Government Performance and Results Act of 1993" Office of Management and Budget 1993

      9 Martin, S., "Economic Impact of Standard Reference Materials for Sulfur in Fossil Fuels" National Institute of Standards and Technology 2000

      10 NIST, "Economic Impact of Measurement in the Semiconductor Industry, Economic Impact of Measurement in the Semiconductor Industry" Prepared by RTI International for National Institute of Standards and Technology 2007

      1 Jeanne Powell, "Toward a Standard Benefit-Cost Methodology for Publicly Funded Science and Technology Programs" 2006

      2 Knut, B., "The Influence of Innovation and Standardization on the Macroeconomic Development in Germany" Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, project financed by the German Institute for Standardization and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Technology 2000

      3 Blind, Knut, "The Economics of Standards:Theory, Evidence, Policy" Edward Elgar 2004

      4 AFNOR, "The Economic Impact of Standardization:TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE" STANDARDS GROWTH IN FRANCE 2009

      5 Tassey, G, "Standardization in Technology-Based Markets" 29 (29): 587-602, 2000

      6 Tassey, G., "Modeling and Measuring the Economic Roles of Technology Infrastructure" National Institute of Standards and Technology 17 (17): 2008

      7 Tassey, G., "Methods for assessing the economic impacts of government R&D" National Institute of Standards and Technology 19-, 2003

      8 GPRA, "Government Performance and Results Act of 1993" Office of Management and Budget 1993

      9 Martin, S., "Economic Impact of Standard Reference Materials for Sulfur in Fossil Fuels" National Institute of Standards and Technology 2000

      10 NIST, "Economic Impact of Measurement in the Semiconductor Industry, Economic Impact of Measurement in the Semiconductor Industry" Prepared by RTI International for National Institute of Standards and Technology 2007

      11 RTI International, "Economic Impact Assessment of the International Standard for the Exchange of Product Model Data (STEP)in Transportation Equipment Industries" Prepared for National Institute of Standards and Technology Program Office 2002

      12 ISO, "Assessing Economic benefits of Standardization, For agenda item 9" General Assembly 2009

      13 ISO, "Assessing Economic Benefits of Consensus-Based Standards" The ISO Methodology 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.59 0.59 0.62
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.63 0.63 0.998 0.07
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼