RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Histologic discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens of colorectal polyp in actual clinical practice

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105480777

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: We aimed to assess the rate of histologic discrepancy (HD) between endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) and totally resected specimens in colorectal polyp and analyze the risk factors of discordant group, especially under-diagnosis (UD) ca...

      Background/Aims: We aimed to assess the rate of histologic discrepancy (HD) between endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) and totally resected specimens in colorectal polyp and analyze the risk factors of discordant group, especially under-diagnosis (UD) cases before complete removal of colorectal polyp. Methods: From 2010 to 2015, a total of 290 polyps in 210 patients which had baseline pathology report before endoscopic resection (ER) were analyzed. UD cases were defined as those in which the diagnosis changed to a more advanced histologic feature after ER. Results: A change in the final histology after ER was noted in 137 cases (47.2%), and after excluding 9 insignificant cases, 128 cases were further categorized into over-diagnosed and under-diagnosed group. UD occurred in 86 cases (29.7%) and change from benign to malignancy was noted in 26 cases (8.9%). On univariate analysis, a larger polyp size (>10 mm) was significantly associated with both HD (P<0.001) and UD (P<0.001). Regarding polyp morphology, protruding or flat was not significantly important. On multivariate analysis, polyp size >10 mm was the single most significant predictor of both HD (P<0.001) and UD (P<0.001). Conclusions: The HD and UD rates were 47.2% and 29.7%, respectively. Polyp size >10 mm was the most important predictor of both HD and UD. We should be careful in making treatment strategy of colorectal polyp based on histologic report of EFB especially when the size of polyp is >10 mm.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 송인도, "대장용종에서 겸자생검과 내시경절제술 사이의 병리소견 차이" 대한소화기내시경학회 37 (37): 14-19, 2008

      2 Pugliese V, "Value of multiple forceps biopsies in assessing the malignant potential of colonic polyps" 67 : 57-62, 1981

      3 Livstone EM, "Value of a single forceps biopsy of colonic polyps" 73 : 1296-1298, 1977

      4 Kwon SU, "The significance of small polyp of colon in Koreans" 17 : 39-48, 2000

      5 Fung CH, "The incidence and significance of villous change in adenomatous polyps" 53 : 21-25, 1970

      6 김경옥, "Surveillance Colonoscopy after Polypectomy: Actual Practice in Korea" 대한장연구학회 12 (12): 83-84, 2014

      7 Coda S, "State of the art in advanced endoscopic imaging for the detection and evaluation of dysplasia and early cancer of the gastrointestinal tract" 7 : 133-150, 2014

      8 ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, "Role of endoscopy in the staging and management of colorectal cancer" 78 : 8-12, 2013

      9 Jung YS, "Risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia according to the number of high-risk findings at index colonoscopy: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) Study" 61 : 1661-1668, 2016

      10 Winawer SJ, "Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. Who Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer" 68 : 789-795, 1990

      1 송인도, "대장용종에서 겸자생검과 내시경절제술 사이의 병리소견 차이" 대한소화기내시경학회 37 (37): 14-19, 2008

      2 Pugliese V, "Value of multiple forceps biopsies in assessing the malignant potential of colonic polyps" 67 : 57-62, 1981

      3 Livstone EM, "Value of a single forceps biopsy of colonic polyps" 73 : 1296-1298, 1977

      4 Kwon SU, "The significance of small polyp of colon in Koreans" 17 : 39-48, 2000

      5 Fung CH, "The incidence and significance of villous change in adenomatous polyps" 53 : 21-25, 1970

      6 김경옥, "Surveillance Colonoscopy after Polypectomy: Actual Practice in Korea" 대한장연구학회 12 (12): 83-84, 2014

      7 Coda S, "State of the art in advanced endoscopic imaging for the detection and evaluation of dysplasia and early cancer of the gastrointestinal tract" 7 : 133-150, 2014

      8 ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, "Role of endoscopy in the staging and management of colorectal cancer" 78 : 8-12, 2013

      9 Jung YS, "Risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia according to the number of high-risk findings at index colonoscopy: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) Study" 61 : 1661-1668, 2016

      10 Winawer SJ, "Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. Who Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer" 68 : 789-795, 1990

      11 Min Jung Kwon, "Risk Factors for Delayed Post-Polypectomy Bleeding" 대한장연구학회 13 (13): 160-165, 2015

      12 Sung HY, "Polyps in the gastrointestinal tract: discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsies and resected specimens" 21 : 190-195, 2009

      13 El Zoghbi M, "New era of colorectal cancer screening" 8 : 252-258, 2016

      14 Bujanda L, "Malignant colorectal polyps" 16 : 3103-3111, 2010

      15 Taylor EW, "Limitations of biopsy in preoperative assessment of villous papilloma" 24 : 259-262, 1981

      16 Yoon WJ, "Histologic characteristics of gastric polyps in Korea: emphasis on discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimen" 12 : 4029-4032, 2006

      17 Vogelstein B, "Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development" 319 : 525-532, 1988

      18 Su MY, "Endoscopic treatment of colorectal neoplasms: a simple and safe procedure to lower the incidence of colorectal cancers" 53 : 1297-1302, 2008

      19 Min BH, "Endoscopic resection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer: focusing on histologic discrepancies between forceps biopsy-based and endoscopic resection specimen-based diagnosis" 59 : 2536-2543, 2014

      20 Choi JM, "Endoscopic predictors for undifferentiated histology in differentiated gastric neoplasms prior to endoscopic resection" 30 : 89-98, 2016

      21 Friedland S, "Endoscopic management of nonlifting colon polyps" 2013 : 412936-, 2013

      22 Stermer E, "Do forceps biopsies truthfully reflect the nature of endoscopically uncovered polypoid lesions of the colon?" 7 : 345-349, 2005

      23 Takao M, "Discrepancies in histologic diagnoses of early gastric cancer between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens" 15 : 91-96, 2012

      24 Park Y, "Dietary patterns and colorectal cancer risk in a Korean population: a case-control study" 95 : e3759-, 2016

      25 이정록, "Determining the optimal surveillance interval after a colonoscopic polypectomy for the Korean population?" 대한장연구학회 15 (15): 109-117, 2017

      26 Shim CN, "Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes of histologic discrepancy between differentiated and undifferentiated types after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer" 28 : 2097-2105, 2014

      27 Gondal G, "Biopsy of colorectal polyps is not adequate for grading of neoplasia" 37 : 1193-1197, 2005

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2015-03-30 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> KASID KCI등재
      2015-03-30 학회명변경 영문명 : KASID -> Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.46
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.4 0.35 0.652 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼