RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조직지위(Organizational Status) 이론의 발전과 전망

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103351201

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since Podolny (1993), who applied the concept of social status to the organiza-tional context, the concept and theory of organizational status have been widely accepted in the field of organization theory and strategic management. As theory has become more elaborated, the needs for evaluating theory development and finding theoretical gaps have increased. As a response, leading scholars have tried to help future scholars by reviewing prior literature on organizational status and related topics and making suggestions about future directions. This paper, in line with these attempts yet differentiated in the review approach, examines theory development by period. By undertaking this historical study, this paper is expected to offer better insights about future theory development. In the 1990s, when organizational status had been introduced in organization theory, theoretical emphasis was put on status as an asset and on the reproducing mechanism of status hierarchies. In the 2000s, as more and various scholars started to employ the concept, various topics have been explored, such as the negative impact of status, status dynamics, and status as a constraint on decisions and behaviors. In the 2010s, more eclectic studies considering both organizational status and identity have been published, along with theoret-ical attempts to integrate organizational status theory and individual-level status theory. In this period, Korean theorists also more actively examined organizational status; however, only recently have Korean scholars employed status concepts to explain business phenomena in Korea. Thus, the need for considering the possible contribution of organizational status theory to K-Management theory development, in addition to the need for future theoretical development of organizational status, has been raised.
    번역하기

    Since Podolny (1993), who applied the concept of social status to the organiza-tional context, the concept and theory of organizational status have been widely accepted in the field of organization theory and strategic management. As theory has become...

    Since Podolny (1993), who applied the concept of social status to the organiza-tional context, the concept and theory of organizational status have been widely accepted in the field of organization theory and strategic management. As theory has become more elaborated, the needs for evaluating theory development and finding theoretical gaps have increased. As a response, leading scholars have tried to help future scholars by reviewing prior literature on organizational status and related topics and making suggestions about future directions. This paper, in line with these attempts yet differentiated in the review approach, examines theory development by period. By undertaking this historical study, this paper is expected to offer better insights about future theory development. In the 1990s, when organizational status had been introduced in organization theory, theoretical emphasis was put on status as an asset and on the reproducing mechanism of status hierarchies. In the 2000s, as more and various scholars started to employ the concept, various topics have been explored, such as the negative impact of status, status dynamics, and status as a constraint on decisions and behaviors. In the 2010s, more eclectic studies considering both organizational status and identity have been published, along with theoret-ical attempts to integrate organizational status theory and individual-level status theory. In this period, Korean theorists also more actively examined organizational status; however, only recently have Korean scholars employed status concepts to explain business phenomena in Korea. Thus, the need for considering the possible contribution of organizational status theory to K-Management theory development, in addition to the need for future theoretical development of organizational status, has been raised.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한준, "한국 시스템통합 산업의 생태지위(Niche) 구조와 기업간 경쟁역학 : 네트워크 분석을 통한 기업 성과의 설명" 한국경영학회 33 (33): 1441-1459, 2004

    2 김난도, "한국 사람들은 왜 그렇게 명품을좋아할까" 서울대 생활과학연구소 2008

    3 김영규, "질문한다, 조직학습" 한국인사조직학회 23 (23): 33-60, 2015

    4 이무원, "조직학습이론(Organizational Learning Theory)의 과거, 현재, 그리고 미래" 한국인사조직학회 23 (23): 11-32, 2015

    5 정대훈, "조직학습과 지위: 한국 대학의 연구개발 투자, 2007-2013년" 한국경영학회 45 (45): 1623-1644, 2016

    6 김관우, "시장의 범주 확장과 지위: 미국 영화 산업, 1999-2010" 한국사회학회 46 (46): 115-139, 2012

    7 알랭 드 보통, "불안" 이레출판사 2004

    8 김영규, "법학교육기관 조직지위와 법률직역에서 사회적 자본의 역할" 법학연구원 26 (26): 409-451, 2016

    9 Slavich, B., "Wishing upon a star: How apprentice-master similarity, status and career stage affect critics’evaluations of former apprentices in the haute cuisine industry" 37 (37): 823-843, 2016

    10 White, H. C., "Where do markets come from?" 87 (87): 517-547, 1981

    1 한준, "한국 시스템통합 산업의 생태지위(Niche) 구조와 기업간 경쟁역학 : 네트워크 분석을 통한 기업 성과의 설명" 한국경영학회 33 (33): 1441-1459, 2004

    2 김난도, "한국 사람들은 왜 그렇게 명품을좋아할까" 서울대 생활과학연구소 2008

    3 김영규, "질문한다, 조직학습" 한국인사조직학회 23 (23): 33-60, 2015

    4 이무원, "조직학습이론(Organizational Learning Theory)의 과거, 현재, 그리고 미래" 한국인사조직학회 23 (23): 11-32, 2015

    5 정대훈, "조직학습과 지위: 한국 대학의 연구개발 투자, 2007-2013년" 한국경영학회 45 (45): 1623-1644, 2016

    6 김관우, "시장의 범주 확장과 지위: 미국 영화 산업, 1999-2010" 한국사회학회 46 (46): 115-139, 2012

    7 알랭 드 보통, "불안" 이레출판사 2004

    8 김영규, "법학교육기관 조직지위와 법률직역에서 사회적 자본의 역할" 법학연구원 26 (26): 409-451, 2016

    9 Slavich, B., "Wishing upon a star: How apprentice-master similarity, status and career stage affect critics’evaluations of former apprentices in the haute cuisine industry" 37 (37): 823-843, 2016

    10 White, H. C., "Where do markets come from?" 87 (87): 517-547, 1981

    11 Castellucci, F., "What’s in it for them? Advantages of higher-status partners in exchange relationships" 53 (53): 149-166, 2010

    12 Neeley, T. B., "Unearned status gain: Evidence from a global language mandate" 59 (59): 14-43, 2016

    13 Pontikes, E. G., "Two sides of the same coin how ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations" 57 (57): 81-118, 2012

    14 Groysberg, B., "Too many cooks spoil the broth:How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness" 22 (22): 722-737, 2011

    15 Sauder, M., "Third parties and status position:How the characteristics of status systems matter" 35 (35): 299-321, 2006

    16 Jensen, M., "The use of relational discrimination to manage market entry: When do social status and structural holes work against you?" 51 (51): 723-743, 2008

    17 Granovetter, M. S., "The strength of weak ties" 78 (78): 1360-1380, 1973

    18 Ridgeway, C., "The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics" 70 (70): 367-386, 1991

    19 Jensen, M., "The real oscar curse: The negative consequences of positive status shifts" 26 (26): 1-21, 2015

    20 Shipilov, A. V., "The prince and the pauper: Search and brokerage in the initiation of statusheterophilous ties" 22 (22): 1418-1434, 2011

    21 Hannan, M. T., "The population ecology of organizations" 82 (82): 929-964, 1977

    22 Kovács, B., "The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality" 59 (59): 1-33, 2014

    23 Gould, R. V., "The origins of status hierarchies:A formal theory and empirical test" 107 (107): 1143-1178, 2002

    24 Rhee, M., "The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry" 17 (17): 101-117, 2006

    25 Castellucci, F., "The dynamics of position, capability, and market competition" 26 (26): 21-39, 2017

    26 Podolny, J. M., "The dynamics of organizational status" 5 (5): 453-471, 1996

    27 Hahl, O., "The denigration of heroes? How the status attainment process shapes attributions of considerateness and authenticity" 120 (120): 504-554, 2014

    28 Bendersky, C., "The cost of status enhancement: Performance effects of individuals’ status mobility in task groups" 23 (23): 308-322, 2012

    29 Park, D. Y., "The competitive dynamics of status and niche width: US investment banking, 1920-1949" 9 (9): 377-414, 2000

    30 Zuckerman, E. W., "The categorical imperative:Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount" 104 (104): 1398-1397, 1999

    31 Ertug, G., "The art of representation: How audiencespecific reputations affect success in the contemporary art field" 59 (59): 113-134, 2016

    32 Jasso, G., "Studying status: An integrated framework" 66 (66): 96-124, 2001

    33 Burt, R. S., "Structural hole" Harvard Business School Press 1992

    34 Askin, N., "Statusaspirational pricing: The “chivas regal”strategy in US higher education, 2006-2012" 61 (61): 217-253, 2016

    35 Sauder, M., "Status: Insights from organizational sociology" 38 : 267-283, 2012

    36 Benjamin, B. A., "Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry" 44 (44): 563-589, 1999

    37 김영규, "Status, Closure, and Brokerage" 한국전략경영학회 13 (13): 121-149, 2010

    38 Reschke, B. P., "Status spillovers" 2017

    39 Podolny, J. M., "Status signals: A sociological study of market competition" Princeton University Press 2005

    40 Lenski, G. E., "Status inconsistency and the vote: A four nation test" 32 (32): 298-301, 1967

    41 Zhao, W., "Status inconsistency and product valuation in the California wine market" 22 (22): 1435-1448, 2011

    42 Piazza, A., "Status in organization and management theory" 40 (40): 287-315, 2014

    43 Thomas-Hunt M. C., "Status in management and organizations" Cambridge University Press 238-266, 2011

    44 Jensen, M., "Status in Management and Organizations" Cambridge University Press 87-113, 2011

    45 Washington, M., "Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence" 48 (48): 282-296, 2005

    46 Lenski, G. E., "Status crystallization: A non-vertical dimension of social status" 19 (19): 405-413, 1954

    47 Bendersky, C., "Status conflict in groups" 23 (23): 323-340, 2012

    48 강정한, "Status Inconsistency and Strategic Behavior: U.S. Venture Capital Investments, 1981 to 2002" 한국사회학회 44 (44): 1-26, 2010

    49 Jensen, M., "Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter?" 51 (51): 495-516, 2008

    50 Lounsbury, M., "Sources of durability and change in market classifications:A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944-1985" 82 (82): 969-999, 2004

    51 Merton, R. K., "Social theory and social structure" Free Press 1968

    52 Martin, J. L., "Social structures" Princeton University Press 2009

    53 Bae, J., "Social structure and alliance formation in the korean telecommunications industry" 7 (7): 121-139, 1998

    54 Podolny, J. M., "Social status, entry, and predation: The case of british shipping cartels 1879-1929" 47 (47): 41-67, 1999

    55 Lin, N., "Social networks and status attainment" 25 (25): 467-487, 1999

    56 Jensen, M., "Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections" 51 (51): 97-128, 2006

    57 Zuckerman, E. W., "Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market" 108 (108): 1018-1073, 2003

    58 Eisenhardt, K., "Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms" 7 (7): 136-150, 1996

    59 Sutton, R. I., "Research in organizational behavior, vol. 18" JAI Press 201-250, 1996

    60 George, G., "Reputation and status: Expanding the role of social evaluations in management research" 59 (59): 1-13, 2016

    61 Bowers, A., "Relative comparison and category membership: The case of equity analysts" 26 (26): 571-583, 2015

    62 Pearce, J. L., "Rating performance or contesting status: Evidence against the homophily explanation for supervisor demographic skew in performance ratings" 23 (23): 373-385, 2012

    63 Anderson, C., "Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one's status in a group" 34 (34): 90-101, 2008

    64 Kahneman, D., "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk" 47 (47): 263-291, 1979

    65 Bothner, M. S., "Primary status, complementary status, and organizational survival in the U.S. venture capital industry" 52 : 588-601, 2015

    66 Bonacich, P., "Power and centrality: A family of measures" 92 (92): 1170-1182, 1987

    67 Greve, H. R., "Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change" 44 (44): 58-86, 1998

    68 Gioia, D. A., "Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability" 25 (25): 63-81, 2000

    69 Brickson, S. L., "Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders" 50 (50): 576-609, 2005

    70 Malter, D., "On the causality and cause of returns to organizational status evidence from the grands crus classés of the médoc" 59 (59): 271-300, 2014

    71 Pfeffer, J., "New directions for organization theory: Problems and prospects" Oxford University Press 1997

    72 Podolny, J. M., "Networks, knowledge, and niches:Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991" 102 (102): 659-689, 1996

    73 Podolny, J. M., "Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market" 107 (107): 33-60, 2001

    74 Podolny, J. M., "Network forms of organization" 24 (24): 57-76, 1998

    75 Zaheer, A., "Network evolution:The origins of structural holes" 54 (54): 1-31, 2009

    76 김현수, "Network Dynamics of Interorganizational Tie Dissolution: A Longitudinal Study of the U.S. Legal Services Market" 한국사회학회 46 (46): 139-161, 2012

    77 Hsu, G., "Multiple category memberships in markets:An integrative theory and two empirical tests" 74 (74): 150-169, 2009

    78 Phillips, D. J., "Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two" 107 (107): 379-429, 2001

    79 Podolny, J. M., "Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange" 39 (39): 458-483, 1994

    80 Spence, A. M., "Market signaling: Informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes" Harvard University Press 1974

    81 Hsu, G., "Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production" 51 (51): 420-450, 2006

    82 Chen, Y., "Introduction to the special issue: Bringing status to the table-attaining, maintaining, and experiencing status in organizations and markets" 23 (23): 299-307, 2012

    83 Stuart, T. E., "Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures" 44 (44): 315-349, 1999

    84 Leifer, E. M., "Intercorporate Relations:The Structural Analysis of Business" Cambridge University Press 85-108, 1987

    85 Baum, J. A., "Institutional linkages and organizational mortality" 36 (36): 187-218, 1991

    86 Greenwood, R., "Institutional complexity and organizational responses" 5 (5): 317-371, 2011

    87 Carter, R., "Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation" 45 (45): 1045-1067, 1990

    88 Smith, E. B., "Identities as lenses: How organizational identity affects audiences’evaluation of organizational performance" 56 (56): 61-94, 2011

    89 Flynn, F. J., "How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity" 46 (46): 539-553, 2003

    90 Bothner, M. S., "How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR" 23 (23): 416-433, 2012

    91 Delmestri, G., "How cinderella became a queen theorizing radical status change" 61 (61): 507-550, 2016

    92 Kilduff, G. J., "Hierarchy and its discontents: Status disagreement leads to withdrawal of contribution and lower group performance" 27 (27): 373-390, 2016

    93 Heath, C., "Goals as reference points" 38 (38): 79-109, 1999

    94 Ertug, G., "Getting what you need: How reputation and status affect team performance, hiring, and salaries in the NBA" 56 (56): 407-431, 2013

    95 Beckman, C. M., "Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection" 15 (15): 259-275, 2004

    96 Rao, H., "Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts" 46 (46): 502-526, 2001

    97 Zuckerman, E. W., "Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and dediversification" 45 (45): 591-619, 2000

    98 Graffin, S. D., "Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: The 2009 british MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites" 58 (58): 313-345, 2013

    99 Bonacich, P., "Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification" 2 (2): 113-120, 1972

    100 Blau, P., "Exchange and power in social life" John Wiley & Sons 1964

    101 Uzzi, B., "Embeddedness and price formation in the corporate law market" 69 (69): 319-344, 2004

    102 Weber, M., "Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology" University of California Press 1978

    103 Bourdieu, P., "Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste" Harvard University Press 1984

    104 Kovács, B., "Contrasting alternative explanations for the consequences of category spanning: A study of restaurant reviews and menus in San Francisco" 12 (12): 7-37, 2014

    105 Hutchinson, G. E., "Concluding remarks" 22 : 415-427, 1957

    106 Chung, S., "Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation" 21 (21): 1-22, 2000

    107 Bothner, M. S., "Competitive crowding and risk taking in a tournament: Evidence from NASCAR racing" 52 (52): 208-247, 2007

    108 Durand, R., "Code and Conduct in French Cuisine: Impact of code changes on external evaluation" 28 (28): 455-472, 2007

    109 Durand, R., "Classical deviation: Organizational and individual status as antecedents of conformity" 59 (59): 65-89, 2016

    110 Heinz, J. P., "Chicago lawyers: The social structure of the bar" Russell Sage Foundation 1982

    111 Sharkey, A. J., "Categories and organizational status: The role of industry status in the response to organizational deviance" 119 (119): 1380-1433, 2014

    112 Shipilov, A. V., "Can you have your cake and eat it too? Structural holes’ influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks" 53 (53): 73-108, 2008

    113 Rao, H., "Border Crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy" 70 (70): 968-991, 2005

    114 McPherson, M., "Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks" 27 (27): 415-438, 2001

    115 Phillips, D. J., "Betrayal as market barrier:Identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms 1" 118 (118): 1023-1054, 2013

    116 Kim, H., "Audience heterogeneity and the effectiveness of market signals: How to overcome liabilities of foreignness in film exports?" 57 (57): 1360-1384, 2014

    117 Stuart, T. E., "A structural perspective on organizational innovation" 8 (8): 745-775, 1999

    118 Podolny, J. M., "A status-based model of market competition" 98 (98): 829-872, 1993

    119 Thye, S. R., "A status value theory of power in exchange relations" 65 (65): 407-432, 2000

    120 Lynn, F. B., "A sociological (de)construction of the relationship between status and quality" 115 (115): 755-804, 2009

    121 D’Aveni, R. A., "A multiple-constituency, status-based approach to interorganizational mobility of faculty and input-output competition among top business schools" 7 (7): 166-189, 1996

    122 Bothner, M. S., "A model of robust positions in social networks" 116 (116): 943-992, 2011

    123 Greve, H. R., "A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals" 51 (51): 476-494, 2008

    124 Podolny, J. M., "A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change" 100 (100): 1224-1260, 1995

    125 Sgourev, S. V., "'Notable' or 'Not Able' When are acts of inconsistency rewarded?" 79 (79): 282-302, 2014

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-02-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사·조직연구 -> 인사조직연구 KCI등재
    2013-02-26 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사·조직학회 -> 한국인사조직학회 KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사ㆍ조직학회 -> 한국인사·조직학회 KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-07-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean journal of management -> Korean Journal of Management KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.29 1.29 1.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.995 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼