교사 직무의 적정 범위와 법제화 방안

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

I think that it is important to legalize the scope of work to reduce the teacher’s work but it is much more effective to build the institutional system in order to reduce the teacher’s work not related to the teacher’s office, administrative chores and relationships with parents.
In recent years, school teachers perform tasks that appeal to the most difficult area, regardless of school level, will be the ‘parents relationships’. Parental expectations and the reality of the process of teacher training and in-service training throughout the program, parents and effective communication and consultation techniques, and conflict resolution techniques in order to increase job satisfaction and reduce the difficulty of the parents in relation to the performance of duties of these teachers. If there is encounter a problem or conflict, it is needed to be aware of the need to instead leave it up to the teachers at the school level to establish support measures that can be solved smoothly.
One of the elements related to teachers’ job performance and struggling, holding the handle on the inside and outside of working hours, school management, support services and other official documents. Interfere with the students ‘education in the concentration of these chores, as well as to infringe on the time to perform your duties as an expert to prepare lesson plans and student teachers, teachers’ enthusiasm and morale dropping students, and the damage back to the shop.
Therefore, in order to improve the quality of teachers’ instructional measures to significantly reduce the level of the chores that need to be processed by the teachers. There is a need to introduce a plan to take advantage of the developed countries like the secondary teacher or administrative staff can increase as part of the measures to reduce chores.
I think it is also a way to reinforce the number of units in the school’s administrative staff and dedicated teachers of administrative tasks, “the Office of Academic Affairs”, dedicated to the work of the administrative unit of the school system in order to construct. By placing administrative staff and the administration, teachers, established “the Office of Academic Affairs”, and dedicated to the school’s administrative duties, administrative classroom teachers and students by the teachers’ resource map, and entirely exempt from the classroom, and will engage only in administrative duties over a period of time. It will be working on the circulation. It also is considered one of the possible ways the City.
System by expanding the Department of Education Superintendent in each school to teachers who want to promote the school as an administrator, to work and to perform administrative tasks.
Another of the measures required to reduce the teacher’s work on “the Elementary and Secondary Curriculum” unnecessary work is exempt. Reduce excessive administrative duties to work or unrelated to the student’s education teachers alone is absolutely required.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서언
• Ⅱ. 법령상의 교사의 직무 관련 규정과 내용
• Ⅲ. 일본의 법령상 교사의 직무 범위
• Ⅳ. 교사 직무의 적정 범위와 법제화
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 【참고문헌】
• 【Abstract】

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박영숙, "학교 급별, 직급별, 취득자격별 교원직무 수행기준에 관한 연구보고서" 한국교육개발원 1999

2 김종건, "학교 경영 혁신을 위한 교장 자격 연수 프로그램 개발 연구보고서" 한국교원대학교 2003

3 교육과학기술부, "초ㆍ중등학교교육과정"

4 박영숙, "제7차 교육과정 운영대비 정규 교원과 계약직 교원의 합리적 배치 및 직무수행기준 설정 방안" 한국교육개발원 2000

5 윤관식, "정보화시대의 직무분석" 학지사 2003

6 김기태, "미래지향적 교사론" 교육과학사 2003

7 정의진, "끊임없이 ‘달리다’. 집중이수제가 휩쓸고 간 지난 학기 수업 풍경, In 이것은 교육이 아니다 -학교의 배반-" 교육공동체 벗 2013

8 한국교원단체총연합회, "교직의 성격과 교사의 역할, In 교사론" 교육과학사 2003

9 진동섭, "교직사회-교직과 교사의 삶" 양서원 1996

10 박상완, "교원평가제에 관한 초등교원의 인식 분석: 교직사회의 특성에서 오는 제약요인과 과제" 2005

11 김혜숙, "교원의 질 관리를 통한 학교개선 국제공동 연구" 한국교육개발원 2001

12 김이경, "교원의 직무수행 실태분석 및 기준 개발 연구" 한국교육개발원 2005

13 박덕규, "교원의 승진평정 체제 개선 및 합리적 평가 방안" 한국교육개발원 2000

14 한국교원단체총연합회, "교원과 교원단체, In 교사론" 교육과학사 2003

15 전제상, "교사평가의 준거개발에 관한 연구" 홍익대학교 대학원 2001

16 안창선, "교사론" 교육과학사 1999

17 한국교원단체총연합회, "교사론" 교육과학사 2003

18 文部省地方課法令硏究會, "全訂學校管理讀本" 第一法規出版社 2000

19 김이경, "OECD 한국교원정책 검토사업 참여와 시사점 분석을 위한 정책연구" 한국교개발원 2004