웹 기반 팀 학습환경에서 학습자의 메시지 유형과 상호작용 형태 분석 = The Analysis of Learners' Message Types and Interaction patterns in Web-based Team Learning Environment

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Analysis of Learners' Message Types and Interaction Patterns in Web-based Team Learning Environment

Lee, Young-Min

Current theoretical and empriacl studies on learners' interaction in web-based team learning have lack of valdity in terms of message types and interaction that occured during the learning. In addition, the results of studies regarding interaction patterns may not be generalazable across different studies. For this reason, we examined the frequency of message types posted by the learners and interaction patterns generated by the combination of the message types, using the sequential analysis and the transition state diagram. We found that: 1) "agree/disagree" message and "state a proposal" message were highly observed; 2) interaction patterns between "state a proposal" and "agree/disagree", "agree/disagree" and "agree/disagree", "direction" and "direction" were observed mostly; and 3) transitional probability and state diagram showed the visualization of team interaction.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 순차분석 방법을 적용하여 웹 기반 팀 학습환경에서 학습자의 메시지 유형과 상호작용 형태를 분석하는 것이다. 특히, 순차분석 방법 중 서술적인 빈도분석, 변환 확률분석, 변환상태 도식, 유의도 검사 등을 적용하여 웹 기반 팀 학습 활동시 나타나는 학습자의 메시지 유형과 상호작용의 형태 등을 분석 제시하였다. 연구결과에 따르면 학습자들은 동의/비동의(n=378), 계획안 진술(n=224), 방향 제시(n=215) 등의 메시지를 다수 게시하는 것으로 나타났다. 또 상호작용의 형태별 빈도분석 결과에 따르면 계획안 진술과 동의/비동의, 동의/비동의와 동의/비동의, 방향제시와 방향제시 메시지 게시를 통한 상호작용이 빈번하게 나타났다. 또 변환상태도식을 통해 웹 기반 팀 학습환경에서 나타나는 상호작용의 형태를 시각화하여 제시하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Andriessen, J. H, "Working with Groupware(Understanding and Evaluating Collaboration Technology)" London: Springer Verlag 2002

2 Salas, E, "Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In Teams" Norwood, NJ: Ablex 3-29, 1992

3 Rouse, W. B, "The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems" 22 (22): 1296-1308, 1992

4 Mathieu, J. E, "The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance" 85 (85): 273-282, 2000

5 Michaelsen, L. K, "Team-based learning in large classes. In Team-based learning" Sterling, VA: Stylus 153-168, 2004

6 Cragin, J, "Team-based learning in international situations. In Team-based learning" Sterling, VA: Stylus 173-182, 2004

7 Freeman, M, "Team-based learning in a course combining in-class and online interaction. In Team-based learning" Sterling, VA: Stylus 183-194, 2004

8 Michaelsen, L. K, "Team-based learning" Sterling, VA: Stylus 2004

9 Ferris, S. P, "Teaching and Learning with Virtual Teams" Hershey, PA: The Idea Group 2005

10 Hashimoto, K, "Students international collaboration project (SICP): a cross-cultural project using virtual teams to learn communication styles. In Teaching and Learning. with Virtual Teams" Hershey, PA: The Idea Group 221-244, 2005

11 Jeong, A, "Sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions" 17 (17): 25-43, 2003

12 Cannon-Bowers, J. A, "Reflections on shared cognition" 22 : 195-202, 2001

13 Stepich, D. A, "Problem-Solving in a Case -Based Course: Strategies for Facilitating Coached Expertise" 49 (49): 53-69, 2001

14 Fayard, A, "One School/two Campuses: a socio-technical Approach for Building The distributed Classroom. In Teaching and Learning. with Virtual Teams" Hershey, PA: The Idea Group 194-220, 2005

15 Voss, J. F, "On the solving of ill-structured problems. In The nature of expertise" Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 261-285, 1988

16 Bakeman, R, "Observing Interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis" Cambridge. London: Cambridge University Press 1997

17 Langan-Fox, J, "Mental models, team mental models, and performance: Process, development, and future directions" 14 (14): 331-352, 2004

18 Cooke, N. J, "Measuring Team Knowledge" 42 (42): 151-173, 2000

19 Oliver, R, "Exploring student interactions in collaborative world wide web computer based learning environments" 7 (7): 263-287, 1998

20 Stout, R. J, "Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training" 1 : 169-182, 1997

21 Poole, M. S, "Decision development in computer- assisted group decision making" 22 (22): 90-127, 1995

22 Kraiger, K, "Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models as indicators of team effectiveness. In Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, & Applications" Manwah, NJ: LEA 63-84, 1997

23 Komis, V, "Computer-Supported Collaborative Concept Mapping: Study of Synchronous Peer Interaction" 7 (7): 169-188, 2002

24 Henri, F, "Computer conferencing content analysis. In Collaborative learning through computer conferencing" Berlin: Springer-Verlag 117-135, 1992

25 Macmillan, J, "Communication overhead: The Hidden cost of team cognition. In Team cognition" Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 61-82, 2004

26 Lavonen, J, "Collaborative Problem Solving in a Control Technology Learning Environment, a Pilot Study" 12 : 139-160, 2002

27 Arts, J. A, "Cognitive effects of an authentic computer-supported, problem-based learning environment" 30 : 465-495, 2002

28 Bauer, M, "Classical content analysis: A review. In Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound" Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 131-151, 2000

29 Fink, L. D, "Beyond small groups: Harnessing the extraordinary power of learning teams. In Team-based learning" Sterling, VA: Stylus 3-26, 2004

30 Bakeman, R, "Analyzing Interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ" Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press 1995

31 Cooke, N. J, "Advances in measuring team cognition. In Team cognition" Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 83-106, 2004

32 Entin, E. E, "Adaptive team coordination" 41 : 321-325, 1999

33 Shen, E, "A Comparative Study of a Project-Based Course: Face to Face and Online(Technical report)" Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University Learning Systems Institute 2004