RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    사물의 물에 뜨거나 가라앉는 현상에 관한 4,5,6세 유아의 분류준거 및 준거 적용의 논리적 일관성 = Young Children`s Causal Explanations for Floating or Sinking Objects and the Logical Consistency of Their Applications

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45048946

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines causal explanations given by 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old children for `floating or sinking` objects and the logical consistency of their applications. Sixty-one children were randomly selected from 2 kindergartens and 2 daycare centers located in Seoul, Korea. The children were asked to classify 21 selected objects according to whether or not they were `floating or sinking` items. In addition, they were asked to give the reasons for their classifications. The results reveal that young children have unique thinking characteristics including dynamism and logical inconsistency. A significant difference in causal explanations occurred by age, and specifically between age 4 and age 5, 6. The categories that showed differences were `weight`, `prior experience`, and `material`, with the 5- and 6-year olds` giving more responses than those of the 4-year olds. There were no significant differences attributable to age in logical inconsistency. However, a significant difference by age was found in dynamism, with the 5- and 6-year olds` proffering more responses than those of the 4-year olds. The correlation was also significant between dynamism and logical inconsistency. On the basis of this study`s findings, the researchers suggest implications for early childhood science education with specific focus on `float or sink?` activities.
    번역하기

    This study examines causal explanations given by 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old children for `floating or sinking` objects and the logical consistency of their applications. Sixty-one children were randomly selected from 2 kindergartens and 2 daycare centers ...

    This study examines causal explanations given by 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old children for `floating or sinking` objects and the logical consistency of their applications. Sixty-one children were randomly selected from 2 kindergartens and 2 daycare centers located in Seoul, Korea. The children were asked to classify 21 selected objects according to whether or not they were `floating or sinking` items. In addition, they were asked to give the reasons for their classifications. The results reveal that young children have unique thinking characteristics including dynamism and logical inconsistency. A significant difference in causal explanations occurred by age, and specifically between age 4 and age 5, 6. The categories that showed differences were `weight`, `prior experience`, and `material`, with the 5- and 6-year olds` giving more responses than those of the 4-year olds. There were no significant differences attributable to age in logical inconsistency. However, a significant difference by age was found in dynamism, with the 5- and 6-year olds` proffering more responses than those of the 4-year olds. The correlation was also significant between dynamism and logical inconsistency. On the basis of this study`s findings, the researchers suggest implications for early childhood science education with specific focus on `float or sink?` activities.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼