농촌경관정책의 실효성을 위한 평가요소 도출|RISS 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

For rural landscape management to run in virtuous circle, the present study has paid attention to the roles and activities of local residents and administration, which are the main sectors of managing landscape. In this respect, this study is aimed to arrange the roles of local residents and administration for landscape management and propose the basic data necessary to develope evaluation index for effectiveness of rural landscape policy. Key findings and implications are as follows. First, literature reviews of 18 landscape management studies found 37 administrative roles and 7 roles of local residents. And those roles were classified into 3 factors by similar concept: 'local government support system', 'landscape management planning', and 'promoting the participation of residents'. Second, two Delphi surveys were conducted with landscape experts to verify the validity of those evaluation items by sector. Third, factor analysis was carried out to analyze the hierarchical structure of those evaluation items. 3 sub-factors were extracted from 'local government support system' sector; 2 sub-factors from the 'landscape management planning' sector; and 4 sub-factors from the 'promoting participation of residents' sector. Fourth, the hierarchy of those evaluation factors was divided into high and low classes and sub-indexes were structured to examine the relative importance of each class and assign a relative weight on each index. The most important sub-factors were turned out as follows: 'local residents' will to practice landscape activities (0.112)', 'local government budget for rural landscape management (0.088), and 'restriction on buildings by village regulation (0.068). It indicates the viewpoints of the landscape experts that local residents' voluntary participation in landscape activities and agreement of local residents on landscape management by village, e.g. village regulation, are preconditions for successful landscape management. In addition, it is significant for a local government to secure the budget of landscape management to support local residents support.

번역하기

목차 (Table of Contents)

I. 서 론
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
II. 이론적 고찰
1. 농촌경관관리의 패러다임 변화
2. 주체별 경관관리 요소

I. 서 론
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
II. 이론적 고찰
1. 농촌경관관리의 패러다임 변화
2. 주체별 경관관리 요소
III. 연구의 방법
1. 연구수행절차
2. 전문가 패널 구성
IV. 결과 및 고찰
1. 델파이 조사·분석 결과
2. 계층적 의사결정(AHP) 조사결과
V. 결 론
References

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 윤상호, "해안지역의 경관관리방안 연구" 한국도시행정학회 20 (20): 51-75, 2007

2 이성창, "서울시 경관관리제도로서 경관자율평가제도의 운영실태 및 인식조사를 통한 개선방안 연구" 서울연구원 13 (13): 141-153, 2012

3 이성창, "서울시 경관관리의 실효성 제고방안에 관한 연구 - 일본 주요도시와의 경관계획 비교분석을 통하여-" 대한건축학회 27 (27): 211-220, 2011

4 김재준, "산림경관관리 방향 설정을 위한 지자체 관리자 의식분석" 한국임학회 99 (99): 603-610, 2010

5 이한석, "부산 연안의 경관관리제도 개선에 관한 연구" 한국항해항만학회 26 (26): 85-94, 2002

6 최정선, "도시계획제도와의 관계를 고려한 경관관리제도 정비방향 연구" 한국도시설계학회 7 (7): 57-72, 2006

7 주신하, "농촌경관의 보전‧형성‧관리를 위한 정책제안 연구" 한국농촌계획학회 14 (14): 77-86, 2008

8 박용하, "농촌경관관리의 인식 및 농촌경관관리 발전방안" 한국농촌계획학회 13 (13): 103-110, 2007

9 정철모, "농촌경관관리를 위한 경관농업지구의 도입방안 모색" 지역개발연구소 40 (40): 29-41, 2008

10 이유직, "농촌경관관리 개선을 위한 주체 간 인식비교" 한국농촌건축학회 17 (17): 41-48, 2015